What is our primary use case?
It's a platform, so it brings on a system for the servers themselves. I have multiple services running over Microsoft Servers, for example.SAP, Exchange . All of my services already running are running over this platform.
I also using it occasionally for application access.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of the solution is its operating system. It's just like Linux or UNIX.
I'm using all the features within it and find them all quite helpful.
I love using it for the DHCP server, DNS services, and using a computer to map sites on our domain.
What needs improvement?
The security should be improved, specifically from port security & Allowed protocols,The improvement should retire all marked ports & protocols as a security breach to enhance platform risks & stability .
Overall, from a security perspective, Microsoft needs to improve.
The Server platform GUI seems to take up a lot of resources unnecessarily.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for twenty plus years for now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
While the solution hasn't always been stable, starting from the 2012 version, it's increasingly gotten more stable.
Since the 2012 version, we find it to be quite stable. The OS between the resources, between applicators, technical support, etc., is all very easy to handle. We don't have issues with it; it seems to be quite reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The company here is using this solution. Sometimes it's for remote access, however, even if they don't use it for that, they already using is as it's implemented over the Windows Server.
I'm not sure if we'll be scaling any more as everyone is using it.
How are customer service and technical support?
Registration is very easy, so we didn't need technical support for that aspect of the solution. However, it still requires continual study in order to use everything properly. In terms of speaking with someone directly, I don't have any information about that, and therefore can't comment on the quality of their service.
How was the initial setup?
The initial implementation was not complex. I'd describe the setup as straightforward.
You have to sign off the approach of the planned service, make a timeline, and start to implement a POC. Once you're done with that, you can apply for it online.
What about the implementation team?
For Microsoft platforms, we have not needed any outside assistance. For the other services, like ERP, we are already using consultants for implementation.
What other advice do I have?
We're just a customers. We've been using multiple versions of the solution up to the 2016 version.
I would recommend the Microsoft platform and Windows Servers in particular. It's great for implementation into any environment and is easy to use. They have enhanced some security, however, there needs more done in that respect.
That said, from an efficiency, performance, business continuity, and integration standpoint, I'd highly recommend the Microsoft platform. While Linux has a better security layer, if that is your concern, be aware it will require investment in a lot of resources, training.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. To get higher marks, the solution really needs to do something about the GUI & its security, which currently consumes a lot of resources & allowing breaching.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?