Actional Other Advice
From a testing standpoint, ignoring license and cost issues, it's not a bad product. You can use it to organize releases, maintain test cases, and provide management with some decent tools. My concern is with Automation integration. While requirement tracking works fine if you have one automated script per requirement, once you create scripts that cover multiple requirements, any failure in the script updates all requirements as failed instead of giving you the option of only failing those requirements that individually failed. I have an open ticket with HP about this. I was looking at OPA, but couldn't find a viable solution. Other than that, I think QC is pretty decent.
View full review »
The new version has real improvements.
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea, AppDynamics, Dotcom-Monitor and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.