Before Adobe Experience Manager, I used other online tools like Pencil or Sketch. I switched to Adobe Experience Manager because it's more extensive and has more features.

When comparing Tietoevry and Adobe Experience Manager, I'd say that the two solutions are different because, in Tietoevry, the website is only available in English, while Adobe Experience Manager has a multilingual option.

You must create a workspace in Tietoevry before the content gets published automatically.

Adobe Experience Manager is simpler to use, which is why my company prefers using it.

I used OpenText TeamSite from Interwoven before switching to AEM. It's still in use, but a lot of people are migrating from TeamSite to AEM. It's a dying technology. It is also based on Java, but it is complex and hard to learn.

We had something called 'Trader' – not an official product name, but a customized tool the company used. The problem was everything was in one place. 

For example, you might have product information in Salesforce, but in Trader, everything was in one place – product information, contacts, analytics. 

The company wanted a distributed environment: content in a different platform, frontend in a different platform, analytics, Adobe Target, Salesforce for product information, MuleSoft for integrations. They divided it across different products, and that migration is currently ongoing.

I used to make WordPress sites. AEM is a CMS and so much more, it requires more of my skills. Companies usually switch because they can integrate more marketing tools easily with their website. Many companies have migrated from SharePoint.

No.

Yes - Magnolia and Joomla, Liferay, etc. I switched my working places and it was just the main product used in the department.

Being in a consultant company solely dedicated to Adobe CQ/AEM, this is not applicable.

No.