AlgoSec Other Solutions Considered
CW
ChristopherWalsh
Vice President Head of Information Security at Itaú
I have looked at other options along the way, like Skybox. AlgoSec came to the market before the alternatives did. When I become aware of it and something is good, I stick with it. Why change?
I went to the Gartner page and looked at who the competitors were. I looked at customer reviews and things like that. However, because I have had such a good experience with AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer, I continue to use it. I have found no reason to go with any of the other alternatives.
Our local policy is that I have to be able to compare at least three products when I go to management to ask for money. I did exactly that. I took three alternatives and brought them to our management team. I explained the whys and wherefores for why I was promoting AlgoSec. Now, we have it here in our environment.
View full review »AZ
Aaron Zollinger
Sr. Network and Security Administrator at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
There were four of us involved in the evaluation of the product.
We compared this tool to two other different tools. Even with their higher-end solution, when we had the full budget for this, AlgoSec was less expensive than some of the other top tools. We looked at FireMon and Tufin. The reason why we said, "No," when we had budget to FireMon and Tufin is because they were not pulling in the application data or URL data.
AlgoSec actually pulls application data and URL data in. AlgoSec is a little easier to use than the other solutions. Cisco recommended AlgoSec to us.
View full review »We also evaluated Tufin.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We finally chose AlgoSec over Skybox for its customizability, the options for integration, and the workflows. Though Skybox was much more user-friendly, it was weaker when it came to integration options and customizability.
View full review »I did not evaluate other options.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »I did not evaluate other options.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »VS
Vitas Smolskis
Lead Infrastructure Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
There were three main players at the time, we went through proof of concepts with each of them, and AlgoSec was definitely the strongest vendor in that group and we don't regret it at all. I think it is a good solution.
The other vendors were promising a lot more than they were actually delivering on when it came time to actually putting it onto our network and evaluating it. We were finding that things that they were telling us that they supported and were part of their packages were not actually functional at the time. So we did not go forward with them because of that. AlgoSec actually had everything working properly. It was very easy to set up and use and it did what they promised.
View full review »The AlgoSec solution was selected before I joined the organization.
View full review »SC
Reviewer287514
Regional Sales Manager - South India at Exclusive Networks
We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »We did look into Tufin.
View full review »JC
Jeffrey Cherpeski
MITP-2 at State of Nevada Department of Administration Message
We did look at a couple of other solutions. FireMon and Qualsys are the only two I remember.
View full review »VS
reviewer1708719
Information Security Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We evaluated other solutions such as Skybox, Tufin. We found the graphical user interface of AlgoSec to be very user-friendly. It provides the information that you need. The information that you need is very well organized as compared to other solutions.
View full review »SC
Reviewer287514
Regional Sales Manager - South India at Exclusive Networks
We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »SL
Stephen L.
Project Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did also consider Tufin.
View full review »We evaluated Tufin.
View full review »TW
Tim Wackenhuth
IT Security Engineer III at Paychex, Inc.
We evaluated Tufin.
View full review »BK
reviewer1571316
Senior Technical Analyst at a maritime company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at Tufin and FireMon. At the time, FireMon was cloud-based and we had a policy that didn't allow us to use it.
We had met with AlgoSec a couple of times over the years at Cisco Live. We were familiar with their platform.
View full review »We have evaluated Tufin and Skybox.
View full review »We went through the RFP process evaluation for all the magic quadrant leaders of the market.
View full review »We also evaluated Skybox.
View full review »MP
NetAdm81724
Network Administrator at City of Calgary
We evaluated a few other options, including Tufin, before choosing this solution.
View full review »AW
Abasi WInt
Security Engineer at Genuine Parts Company
This solution was in place prior to me transitioning to this role.
View full review »I did not evaluate other options previously.
View full review »AS
Andre Santiago
Senior Consultant at Deloitte Portugal
We evaluated other options before choosing this solution including Skybox and Palo Alto Panorama.
View full review »MD
Mark DeLongchamp
Global Network Security Engineer at General Motors
I was not part of the evaluation.
View full review »SP
STALIN PAULRAJ
Manager - Network Service Delivery (IP & Security) at Prudential Corporation Asia at Prudential Corporation Asia
We evaluated three marketing leaders in the NSMP industry. However, we are not interested in highlighting anyone here.
View full review »MG
reviewer1026111
IT Security Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We have evaluated number of solutions which are available on the Market. In my opinion several of them were concentrating to much on security operations and SOAR while not having that much functionality related to managing rulebases. Solid firewall change management is something must to have as it is provide strong basis for security governance, improves company's posture and allow to reduce risks in rapidly growing companies associated with multiple changes which might be not properly assessed or implemented as a security exception.
View full review »We were doing some workshops with both AlgoSec and Tufin.
View full review »RF
Ricardo Fernandes
Resp. Area de Segurança at REN
We evaluated the main competitor, Tufin, because we were using it!
View full review »I did not evaluate another solution.
View full review »MK
Mustafa Karanfil
Network Security Engineer at Türkiye İş Bankası
Before purchasing AlgoSec, we implemented a PoC with each of AlgoSec, Tufin, and FireMon.
View full review »We evaluated FireMon but it was more complicated than AlgoSec and did not fulfill our basic requirements.
View full review »AS
Arieh Shalem
Director of Information Security Operations at First Quality Enterprises
We did not evaluate options other than AlgoSec and Tufin.
View full review »NR
Nick Rose
Network Manager at iPSL
Yes, we looked at Tufin and FireMon.
View full review »ZS
Zach Sloneker
IT Security Analyst at The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
AG
Amit Gumber
Consultant at HCL Technologies
We have tried FireMon and Tufin under a non-production environment, but the overall features of AlgoSec were best. Therefore, we choose this product for our production environment.
View full review »MR
reviewer1449057
Cloud and Digital Transformation Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We looked into Tufin. We chose AlgoSec because of its support for Cisco ACI. Tufin was just releasing that and we felt that AlgoSec was a more mature product.
View full review »EL
Erick Legaspi
Level 3 Security Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We also looked into FireMon and Tufin.
View full review »GB
reviewer1734192
L3 Security Engineer at NTT Security
We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »SE
Sulochana Edirisuriya
Senior Systems Engineer with 51-200 employees
I find AlgoSec more organized than some of the other products. With some other products, you have to go here and there to check it, but with AlgoSec it's more organized. But, I find some of the other products more customizable than AlgoSec. It takes a little bit of time to do the customization, for example, if you need to change or add some special level of approval or if you need to add three different levels of approvals for a particular workflow. To do that, sometimes you have to contact AlgoSec's regional support. But with other products that I know, it's just a matter of adding a particular character to the workflow. In some cases I have found other products that are useful, but in terms of organization, I find AlgoSec easier and more manageable than some of the other products.
View full review »I did not evaluate other options. I do like NetBrain's Path tool. This gives us a similar capability to FireFlow and has some other really great tools.
View full review »My team was not involved in testing or pilots of any other solution prior to making a decision. Another global team was part of the negotiations, study, and comparison. My team and I were involved once the decision was made.
View full review »IM
Idan Malei
Global Network and Security Team Leader at Ormat Technologies Inc
We did not evaluate other options before choosing this solution.
View full review »KK
reviewer1753230
Client Manager - TE Services at NTT Security
We evaluated a few other options before positioning this solution.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options before choosing this solution.
View full review »We did evaluate other options, but I am not sure of the reasons for choosing this one because it was a management decision.
View full review »Just Tufin, as this was a competitor to AlgoSec.
View full review »AM
AbdulMohsin
Regional Sales Engineer at RedSeal, Inc.
AlgoSec-type products and requirements are not necessary or prevalent these days. If you look at AlgoSec, what do they have? They do firewall management, predominantly. Firewall management as a technology is dying. If you look at Palo Alto, Fortinet, Forcepoint, Cisco, or Juniper, all these firewall vendors are coming up with firewall management platforms. If you talk about Palo Alto, they have Panorama. If you talk about Juniper, they have Junos Space. If you talk about Fortinet, they have FortiManager. You can manage their firewalls using the respective vendor management consoles. The question comes, "Why would someone want to use AlgoSec to do firewall management?" The usability takes a dip in terms of capability because people trust the native vendor, e.g., someone who manages Palo Alto firewalls will do it with Panorama because Panorama is a product of Palo Alto.
AlgoSec's use case was good four years ago before FortiManager and Panorama. If you have a hundred firewalls from Fortinet, then you can manage all of them for a single FortiManager. If you have 50 Palo Alto Firewalls, you can manage those from Panorama in a single pane of glass. These solutions did not exist four years ago, and now AlgoSec is losing its essence in the market since these native vendors have been launched.
Four years ago when I started off with AlgoSec, and I'm still working with them, it was strategic. Now, it has become tactical. AlgoSec has a very good feature of doing firewall rule optimization, which has not been there in the native products. For the last couple of years, the native products also started coming up with firewall rule optimization. For example, Palo Alto (from PAN-OS 9.0 and above) was released a year and a half back. It does firewall rule analysis for you. It is the same case with Fortinet and Forcepoint. Therefore, if I have to sell products on firewall management, which does firewall rules on analysis, what is the use case that I give to customers with AlgoSec?
I am running out of AlgoSec use cases because the native vendors give you the capability to do firewall management, firewall rule analysis, and pushing conflicts to multiple firewalls from a single screen. These are the use cases of AlgoSec. This is what AlgoSec does. This story is not just limited to AlgoSec. Products like FireMon and AlgoSec and the way they used to do firewall management have become a commodity. Now, most of the firewalling vendors have the same functionality in their management console.
Companies, like RedSeal, or even to an extent, Skybox, are better built because they take the story to the next level. They don't just look at firewalls. They also look at the network, vulnerabilities, risk, governance, compliance, architecture issues, and incident response. This is the story which customers love to see because none of the native vendors are providing this.
RedSeal and Skybox are doing firewall management for free. They don't charge you for it. On top of it, they do:
- Complete network visualization.
- Give you best practice conflict checks.
- Security architecture issues.
- Risk analysis of every IP asset in your organization.
- Vulnerability prioritization.
TB
Thiago Bujnowski, PMP
Defensive Security Leader at Stone Pagamentos
Yes. Tufin and FireMon.
View full review »MC
MiracleChukwudebe
Security Analyst at Ethnos IT Solutions LTD
AlgoSec is 10 out of 10 compared to FireMon. Compared to any other solution that does firewall analysis and policy management, AlgoSec deserves 10 out 10 because of:
- Its simplicity: Virtually everything about AlgoSec is straightforward.
- Versatility, as far as the reporting and alerting.
- Support, which is quite amazing.
NM
Nicholas Maurel
Digital Security Specialist at Derivco
I would not like to disclose which other products, but I have used two other products that didn't even come close to AlgoSec's power.
View full review »We didn't evaluate other products as we had a previous, much smaller deployment of AlgoSec that we were happy with.
View full review »We did POC on FireMon and AlgoSec. We chose AlgoSec for our company environment.
View full review »RM
Riyas Mohammed
Works
Before selecting this product, we evaluated Tufin.
View full review »We evaluated differents solution when launching the project, like Tufin. This one was the most mature.
View full review »VZ
Vadim Zaparovany
Chief Technology Officer at Accord Group
I have hands-on experience with Tuffin and both of these products (Tuffin and AlgoSec) are equal in terms of functionality. In terms of main differences, it comes down to a personal preference.
View full review »We evaluated FireMon before choosing this solution.
View full review »WP
WingPoon
Global Network Solution Architech at AXA Tech
Not applicable.
View full review »We evaluated FireMon.
View full review »Before choosing AlgoSec, we evaluated Tufin as an option. We chose AlgoSec because it has a better interface.
View full review »I did not evaluate other options before choosing AlgoSec.
View full review »It was not my work to choose this solution; a project team did it.
We evaluated all of AlgoSec's competitors and chose AlgoSec as it was the best.
View full review »TC
reviewer1901940
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have tried other vendors. This is the best solution that we came up with due to our requirements and demands.
View full review »RD
Renato Marques Dos Reis Paula
Senior Security Analyst at Compugraf
We evaluated Tufin and FireMon before choosing AlgoSec.
View full review »Before choosing this product, we evaluated SolarWinds and FireMon.
View full review »FB
reviewer1340760
Network & Collaboration Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
JC
Joby George Cherian
Works
I did a basic evaluation of FireMon, which had identical features to the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer.
View full review »Yes: Tufin.
View full review »We evaluated other options. FireMon and Tufin were on the list but AlgoSec won out. It is better.
AlgoSec may be little pricier with its licenses, but it is probably better than any of other competitors.
View full review »As a fair evaluation, other solutions are available in the security policy cleanup area. However, AlgoSec stands apart with a visionary business centric approach – not limiting itself to a mere firewall security cleanup tool. With AlgoSec, we also get an automated security change management/compliance solution. It has the unique and powerful application connectivity auto-discovery and then translates these to firewall rules. This is useful to achieve automation during datacenter migration, etc.
View full review »SS
reviewer1552971
Sr Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We use Cisco ACI with Check Point , FortiGate, and Palo Alto.
View full review »JS
Julian Santos
Works at a wireless company with 10,001+ employees
I evaluated FireMon and Nipper in addition to this solution.
View full review »IS
reviewer1288842
Security Operations Engineer at a security firm with 201-500 employees
AlgoSec is better than Skybox and Tufin. We have a lot of AlgoSec licenses. It offers the ability to do optimization and varied tasks.
AlgoSec offers diagrams about different pieces of equipment but Tufin and Skybox don't offer these features. I can also control external IPs. We can see the configuration. All equipment has configuration and AlgoSec enables us to log that traffic. We have control over the flow.
Before choosing this solution we evaluated FireMon and Tufin.
View full review »MR
Mark Rizal Thalib
Freelance System Security Consultant at a consultancy
I didn't evaluate other options.
View full review »JM
Jose Mendes
Network Security Engineer/Architect at Euronext Technologies SAS
We heard about Tufin and Algosec, and after going through the specs we decided to go on a POC with Algosec and ended up buying it as it fitted our needs. We followed our Firewall integrator advice, who also recommended Algosec for our Firewall's park which is basically Fortinet and Check Point.
View full review »GR
reviewer1260276
Senior Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We evaluated Skybox and Tuffin as well. Our internal team showed interest in AlgoSec right away, however, Skybox was a real challenge to differentiate.
View full review »OO
reviewer1017186
Deputy CISO/ Security Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
No evaluations. AlgoSec was recommended, and we got a trial version for a period.
View full review »I did not evaluate any other solutions.
View full review »We have chosen this system after evaluation (RFQ). The other competitor was Tufin.
NN
Noel Noguera
Technical Director at Keystone Solutions, Inc.
Yes, Tufin.
View full review »We benchmarked Tufin before choosing AlgoSec. We chose AlgoSec over Tufin for its capacity to be more customized and its support for MPLS and VRF.
View full review »We also did a PoC with Tufin and FireMon.
View full review »We looked at Tufin and Skybox. AlgoSec was the only vendor who had the full suite of products which met the customer and business demands. BusinessFlow was (still is) the game changer.
View full review »No other options were evaluated.
View full review »Tufin, Skybox.
View full review »No other options were evaluated.
View full review »Yes, Tufin.
View full review »Tufin, we selected AlgoSec because it provide some useful features that other solution didn't have.
View full review »We evaluated two other vendors in addition to AlgoSec.
View full review »We also looked at Tufin.
View full review »I tested Firemon which is great, the only problems were the lack of a web GUI interface and our Apple clients couldn’t connect to it.
We also looked at ManageEngine.
View full review »As a distributor, we took AlgoSec as a complementary product to Fortinet, which was one of our main products.
View full review »Tufin was also evaluated.
View full review »I don’t know if they evaluated other options before choosing this product.
View full review »We have looked at the main competitors, which are FireMon and Tufin.
View full review »KK
Ketan Khambe
Technical Presales Engineer at Exclusive Networks
Yes, Skybox was there, but the GUI and some of the features are missing.
View full review »We evaluated the FireMon solution prior to this product.
View full review »I tried the ManageEngine firewall analyzer. AlgoSec has a superior firewall policy optimization algorithm.
View full review »No other products were evaluated.
View full review »I was not the one who made the decision, but I have been supporting for customer.
View full review »No other options were evaluated.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.