erdemerdag - PeerSpot reviewer
Cybersecurity Operations Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to set up with good monitoring and easy integrations
Pros and Cons
  • "It can be easily integrated with different firewall devices (even different brands and models)."
  • "At the integration point, a manual page could be added to the dashboard where directions about the products are explained in detail."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the AlgoSec solution to monitor and interpret the risk status in our firewalls. Seeing the troublesome situations experienced in our firewalls from the same point of view sometimes does not help to solve the problem. However, thanks to AlgoSec, it is of great benefit to observe these risks from a different perspective and to see that they improve in the process. Being able to see and follow these changes makes the work of system administrators and risk analysts much easier.

How has it helped my organization?

It is of great benefit to observe the firewall risks from a different perspective and to see that they are improving in the process. When the effects of tightening and improvements are checked regularly, we can better monitor the current risk situation. It is a difficult process to examine the security risks in detail in each of our products and in our firewalls which may be different brands and models. AlgoSec enables us to manage this process in a central way.

What is most valuable?

AlgoSec can monitor the current status of firewalls. Other vendors mostly focus on working with daily tasks, however, AlgoSec is able to follow the live status and current issues or changes with the help of push technology. It can be easily integrated with different firewall devices (even different brands and models). In this way, it becomes very easy to monitor different risks from a single interface. Thanks to the web-based management screen, it can be easily managed through any end-user operating system.

What needs improvement?

At the integration point, a manual page could be added to the dashboard where directions about the products are explained in detail. In this way, if the system administrator wants to integrate a new product, they will be able to integrate this product by following these directions, even if they do not have deep knowledge of the product in question. Integrating different products should not require us to have to wait for coordinated work with a product specialist.

Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for almost four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In terms of stability, we have no complaints so far. We didn't face any problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution works well in mid-size companies. 

How are customer service and support?

Customer service is very good and educated. However, the process to open a ticket sometimes could be harder than necessary since we need to collect some logs from the dashboard and upload them to the related ticket before submitting it.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used the Skybox Security solution as well.

How was the initial setup?

The product offers an almost straightforward setup. It is easy to install and integrate.

What about the implementation team?

I installed the product by myself.

What was our ROI?

We cannot calculate ROI based on vulnerability or data leak issues.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost and licensing are reasonable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: I am a real user besides my company is a technical support provider of Algosec as well.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer262735 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
User
Good for performing audits and monitoring firewall changes but RFEs are kept open for too long
Pros and Cons
  • "We were able to improve the security ratings of our firewalls."
  • "There is no visibility for the changes made to the NAT rule policies."

What is our primary use case?

The most common use cases include:

  • Performing audits on an annual basis with the help of information security
  • Remediating risky rules by trusting them or remediating them at the firewall level
  • Unused rules and disabled rules are addressed on a regular basis
  • All firewall changes are monitored through AlgoSec with the help of change notifications
  • Improving compliance and risk management and connections revolving around the network Layer 3
  • Locating objects and addressing any issues on a much quicker basis

How has it helped my organization?

We were able to improve the security ratings of our firewalls. It helped us with annual audits, change notifications, rule assessments, and visibility in general.

It improved compliance and risk management and connections revolving around the network Layer 3.

We can get all the firewall-related data with a single click and effectively work on synchronizing with all the firewall gateways including the management server.

What is most valuable?

It helps us with firewall audits on an annual basis with the help of information security.

We remediate risky rules by trusting them or remediating them at the firewall level.

We address the unused rules and disabled rules on a regular basis.

All firewall changes are monitored through AlgoSec with the help of change notifications.

It improved compliance and risk management and connections revolving around the network Layer 3.

It helps locate objects and address any issues on a much quicker basis.

What needs improvement?

RFEs are kept open for too long. We had requested a couple of features, including the ability to trust implicit rules, and IPT doesn't run on IPSEC-enabled firewalls (Cisco to be specific). We had reported these issues for over four years now and still we do not see any resolution.

There is no visibility for the changes made to the NAT rule policies.

Adding objects or object groups on the firewall also do not generate a change notification.

There is no visibility for changes made to the secondary standby firewall if the firewalls are added as a cluster.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for more than five years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use a different solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Lead Infrastructure Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Enables us to drill down to the level where we can see the actual policy rule that's affecting the risk ratings
Pros and Cons
  • "AlgoSec provides full visibility into the risk involved in firewall change requests as well. It definitely allows us to drill down to the level where we can see the actual policy rule that's affecting the risk ratings. If there are any changes in ratings, it'll show you exactly how to determine what's changed in the network that will affect it. It's been very clear and intuitive as far as that."
  • "Some of the auditing functionality needs improvement. Our major focus is the firewall validation process and tracking and verifying that changes are implemented correctly. We are actually doing parts of the auditing process manually. And getting any one of the vendors to bring out a good auditing process has been very difficult."

What is our primary use case?

I mainly use AFA and FireFlow. The majority of the network is internal. We have a very limited footprint in the cloud right now. But what we do have in the cloud is private. Being a financial institution, everything is very secure. So we don't have anything in the public cloud.

We're primarily using AlgoSec for firewall management and change validation. So we use it for monitoring all the firewall changes and security ratings. Any kind of firewall change is monitored and we have our own process that we use AlgoSec for to validate that changes are implemented according to the requests and go through all of the change approval processes.

How has it helped my organization?

We are using it for the firewall change auditing process for our department. They are one of the leaders that we found in this area. There is a very limited group of vendors that provide this kind of functionality and we've gone through the majority of them. AlgoSec still stands out as the leader, in our opinion.

What is most valuable?

We primarily use AFA for the change management portion of it. But the security ratings also are used by our security group to ensure compliance and validate that nothing is being configured that is not in our best interest.

The overall visibility AlgoSec gives into our network security policies has been very good. We are happy with the way the application works. It is very intuitive and easy to use. I would give that a very high rating.

AlgoSec provides full visibility into the risk involved in firewall change requests as well. It definitely allows us to drill down to the level where we can see the actual policy rule that's affecting the risk ratings. If there are any changes in ratings, it'll show you exactly how to determine what's changed in the network that will affect it. It's been very clear and intuitive as far as that.

I don't know if it has reduced the time it takes to implement firewall rules in our company. We don't use it for implementing changes because our network is very in-depth and we're very particular with our security on that, that we do manually make all of our firewall changes. So we're not using the automated functionality of AlgoSec to do that for us. But I think that's more because of the restrictions that we have in our own network.

AlgoSec is very good when it comes to preparing for audits and ensuring our firewalls are in compliance. The security ratings are a major factor in that lately, as well as being able to show the configurations and how they affect the risk ratings. Whenever we do need to address any issues, it's very clear to show us exactly what the effects of the ratings are, as tied into the firewall policies.

We work with multiple security vendors. I'm not on the security team any longer. I went from network group to security and then back again. But our security group does work with AlgoSec and they use it very intimately for different functions.

What needs improvement?

Some of the auditing functionality needs improvement. Our major focus is the firewall validation process and tracking and verifying that changes are implemented correctly. We are actually doing parts of the auditing process manually. And getting any one of the vendors to bring out a good auditing process has been very difficult. AlgoSec does a good job of showing us the changes, but we're doing a manual process to actually audit it and do documentation that we can provide to our auditors that shows we're validating everything, and on top of it, that nothing gets implemented without being caught. Part of that could be improved upon.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec since 2016, so it's been around five and a half years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability has been great. We had a minor bug with the latest version and development. I did work with support to get that ironed out. They resolved it so right now, it looks to be very stable. And we are looking to put that into production shortly.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability seems very good. I haven't seen any restrictions if we were to bring in other hardware or other devices in terms of how to scale it out, either size-wise or vendor-wise.

We have our network group, which we use AlgoSec for, for investigating the risks, configuration issues and things like that. The security group uses it for risk ratings and compliance verification. Then we have a separate group, which is a different group of security that uses it for the firewall validation process. They're the ones that use it on a daily basis to investigate any firewall changes and tie those back to the original request and validate that they were implemented properly.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support has been very good. They're very responsive, very quick to get back to you, and very helpful. They bring in developers very quickly and easily to get into the details. Our last issue we had seemed to be very unusual, and with their support, they brought in the actual developers that were working on this software and resolved it very quickly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a couple of different solutions and they all have their problems. We thought we had a good solution at one point until we found out that it wasn't working properly. When you trust in an application like this and you believe in the numbers that it's giving you, you go with that as gospel until you find out that it's wrong. That vendor's support was just not on the level that we wanted. We were getting no response from them for a long time. So we finally gave up on them until we went to AlgoSec, and it was a much better solution for us.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward. It is very easy to integrate network devices into AlgoSec and manage them. It's even getting easier with the latest version. We integrated Palo Alto devices into AlgoSec and it is very simple to bring it in. We have a development server that we're testing out the latest version on, and that came in in minutes. It brought it all in automatically.

The earlier versions of AlgoSec, especially when they came out originally, would not integrate properly with Panorama. So at that point, we had to integrate AlgoSec to actually reach out to every firewall individually for configurations and change status. The current releases are now integrating directly into Panorama. It's just basically one connection into Panorama and it pulls in all of the configurations from there. It's much more simplified.

What was our ROI?

I don't really get involved in ROI. But I definitely think it's valuable to us and I think it is a good solution for us.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't get into the pricing aspect of it that much. But from my beliefs of it, I believe it is very cost-efficient compared to other vendors. Their licensing is very straightforward and they're easy to work with.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

There were three main players at the time, we went through proof of concepts with each of them, and AlgoSec was definitely the strongest vendor in that group and we don't regret it at all. I think it is a good solution.

The other vendors were promising a lot more than they were actually delivering on when it came time to actually putting it onto our network and evaluating it. We were finding that things that they were telling us that they supported and were part of their packages were not actually functional at the time. So we did not go forward with them because of that. AlgoSec actually had everything working properly. It was very easy to set up and use and it did what they promised.

What other advice do I have?

Their sales engineers have really been very helpful and very good at working with us. I have nothing bad to say about them. They were excellent and I have a good relationship with them. If I ever need anything, I'll reach out to either our sales executive or our SE anytime and they respond immediately to us.

I would say the biggest thing we've learned with it is how much information it does give you. It is a nice platform. It definitely drills in a lot of layers of security and efficiencies that you can do. We're not using it to its full potential for cleaning up policy rules. As most companies are now, they are short-staffed and overworked. But it definitely can be used a lot more than we are using it for. Overall, it's a great solution and I have not seen another vendor in this marketplace that does any better than this.

I would rate AlgoSec a nine out of ten. We would like to see the auditing functionality improved. But that would be the only shortcoming at this point. I do think that they are top of the marketplace for this.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
IbrahimAlsharif - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT at CITG
Real User
Top 10
Flexible, reduces human error, and helps with optimization
Pros and Cons
  • "With the AlgoSec firewall analyzer, it now takes us half the time to deploy firewall changes and policy optimization."
  • "Releasing hot fixes or patches is late compared to other security products."

What is our primary use case?

We have implemented the AlgoSec ASMS solution with the AFA Firewalls analyzer, AFF Fireflow, and AppViz application security,

We are using all these modules to have a more tightened and secure environment. The AFA we are using is it to optimize and clean the firewalls' rules and to comply with the cybersecurity policies and standards. 

The Fireflow is integrated with the ticketing system to simplify and facilitate the opening of tickets process and document it for later reference.

The AppViz module is used to secure and optimize access to the applications in a secure way.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution has allowed us to:
• Easily prove compliance during internal or external audits
• Has reduced resources needed to manage firewall changes

With the AlgoSec firewall analyzer, it now takes us half the time to deploy firewall changes and policy optimization.

The AFA also provided us with the flexibility and intelligence that reduces human error and risk.

It allows the security compliance team to focus more on providing a better level of security and compliant devices than on the process and changes.

What is most valuable?

AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer offers great security policy visibility and the analysis has changed the firewalls management and operation, including firewall rulesets cleaning, optimization, tuning, and ensuring compliance with the company and PCI-DSS requirements.

Also, the fact that this firewall management solution will reduce the resources needed to manage the firewall changes the management processes and audits.

It leads to a quick response to any type of audit whether it's an internal audit or an external audit.

What needs improvement?

Releasing hot fixes or patches is late compared to other security products.

Also, the integration with the Cisco FTD security group tagging is still not supported, so we cannot get the rules with SGT-ACL, and still there is no clear roadmap to support such a feature.

The user interface can be more friendly. They could work on enhancing it by adding step-by-step guides in the GUI of the AlgoSec AFA.

It's better to give some priority to the integration with other security systems and enhance this capability.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for about two years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use another solution previously.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Gabriel Borlean - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Specialist at UFST.dk
User
Top 10
Great search tools, good firewall cleanup functionality, and very user-friendly
Pros and Cons
  • "The user-friendliness, visibility, compliance and efficiency are unparalleled in the industry."
  • "I would say that the cases opened with AlgoSec could be solved faster or escalated sooner to the senior engineers/2nd or 3rd tier."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for firewall management (with AFA - AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer) and application network visibility (with AppViz).  

We are running multiple firewalls and hundreds of users who request firewall connectivity.  

How has it helped my organization?

When it comes to a large organization with many vendors/partners, our firewalls are more easily managed using the AlgoSec AFA component.  The ease of use, visibility, compliance, and efficiency is unmatched in the industry. 

We have used AlgoSec AFA to have more visibility into the network and know what firewalls to activate. 

AlgoSec AFA has great search tools and firewall cleanup functionality. 

The Algsec AppViz is a newer Algosec element that we will use to improve application security and visibility in our complex network.

What is most valuable?

The firewall management tool and AppViz for application visibility and security in the network are great. 

The user-friendliness, visibility, compliance and efficiency are unparalleled in the industry. We have more visibility into the network and now we know what firewalls to activate. 

AlgoSec AFA has great search tools.

The firewall cleanup functionality is helpful. 

We also enjoyed the use of AlgoCare which speeds up the ticket troubleshooting process with AlgoSec Support.

What needs improvement?

I would say that the cases opened with AlgoSec could be solved faster or escalated sooner to the senior engineers/2nd or 3rd tier. AlgoSec Support is very good at responding very fast (faster than the required SLA) and very timely. Their engineers are based either in India or Israel. Each region has its sales person and technical engineer person.  

Another pet peeve is that there are hotfixes for new issues or bugs at least once a month, if not more frequently.  Overall, AlgoSec is trying to improve its case-resolution support team and process, and we are optimistic that our issues or bugs will be fixed much timelier.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for over three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a very stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very scalable.

How are customer service and support?

Customer service and support are very prompt, always complying with SLAs. However, the time to resolution can be improved.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use a different solution previously.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward, and the online documentation and AlgoSec engineer support are more than adequate.

What about the implementation team?

We set up the solution in-house.

What was our ROI?

I am not privy to the financial benefits or ROI for this product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I am not privy to the cost of the product, as I am a Network Specialist.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The AlgoSec solution was selected before I joined the organization.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Regional Sales Manager - South India at Exclusive Networks
User
Top 10
Enhances security policy management and enhances visibility and control
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution helps visualize and manage the hybrid network."
  • "Support can be improved as there are time delays for resolutions."

What is our primary use case?

I am working with AlgoSec for supporting my end clients and partners. AlgoSec has different functionalities. The primary use case of this solution is firewall policy management which helps most of the enterprise's customers to manage their L3 devices and multiple firewalls in their environment at a single console and audit firewall configuration from time to time. AlgoSec provides full visibility into the risk involved in firewall change requests. The network topology table helps to understand where the traffic flows through and where it's interconnected.

How has it helped my organization?

The comprehensive visibility of network security allows users to understand the dependencies between different policies. In the firewall analyzer, we can easily visualize and analyze all the devices within the network. To check the connectivity between the two devices, you can use the source's IPs and destination.

We can build the whole network topology using Algosec easily and provide optimization with all networks.

The verification of policies on all integrated firewalls with a minimal time period. 

What is most valuable?

The solution helps visualize and manage the hybrid network. 

Auto Discover applications and services are great. 

It simplifies security policy management. 

The product enhances visibility and control. 

Compliance automation and network topology are great. 

You can connect applications to security policy rules. 

Everything can be micro-segmented successfully.

We can easily identify risky rules. 

End-to-end security management is simple in that we can automate every change. 

It has effortless cloud management and can detect firewall configuration changes to spot unusual activities.

What needs improvement?

AlgoSec provides very good support to their clients. There are no complaints. That said, these items can be improved:

  • Support can be improved as there are time delays for resolutions
  • In the current version of AngloSec analyzer, we can not delete the object from all firewalls and need to do the task manually
  • We need more effective topology diagram
  • There are challenges in connecting the different security vendors
  • User creation and assigning roles are a little bit difficult
  • While upgrading we have to upload package files which can be downloaded from the Algosec website yet the downloading takes time

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is excellent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product performs well in the environment.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use a different solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is based on a subscription model and the costs associated are worth it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Algosec Distributor
PeerSpot user
reviewer184691 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at Tata Consultancy
Vendor
Great policy optimization, rule cleanup, and network discovery features
Pros and Cons
  • "Audit-ready reporting is an awesome feature."
  • "Fireflow needs to be a little more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for rule optimization. We had almost 100+ firewalls in our network. AlgoSec helps us to manage the firewalls more effectively.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec made our work simple in managing the multivendor firewall rule. Audit-ready reporting is an awesome feature.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable aspects of the solution include policy optimization, rule cleanup, and network discovery.

What needs improvement?

They need to do some improvements in multi-vendor firewall policy migration. They need improvements in network discovery. The solution could fix some bugs in the A32. Fireflow needs to be a little more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for the past four years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Firemon. AlgoSec has more functionality and is user-friendly to manage our firewall more effectively.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is good.

What was our ROI?

The ROI is good.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

AlgoSec provided the best price and the team helped effectively with the support and A32 migration.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did look into Tufin.

What other advice do I have?

The solution is the best in the market.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
MITP-2 at State of Nevada Department of Administration Message
Real User
Traffic queries help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic goes through two or more firewalls
Pros and Cons
  • "Traffic queries are a great help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic is going through two or more firewalls."
  • "The initial cost was high for us, but we have always been behind the tech curve and cost has always been the limiting factor."

What is our primary use case?

I am the senior network security engineer in an environment of more than 80 firewalls ranging from ASA 5506-X to ASA 5585-X and now to FortiGate 3960E. As part of this position, I need to be able to audit firewalls and ensure that they are compliant to a number of policies.  Before AlgoSec, this was done in a very long, slow manual process, and it took days to audit even the smallest firewall. With AlgoSec, I can run a compliance report and see exactly where that firewall falls short.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec has freed up my time to look into new solutions and complete other jobs that I have to get done. I have been able to shepherd the migration from Cisco ASA to FortiGate and using AlgoSec made that process much easier. Now, when I get a request for audit information, that information is available at a click. A PCI audit is no sweat. I know which firewalls fall under PCI, and I can provide the needed answers in minutes instead of days.  This has improved my use of time.

What is most valuable?

Policy optimization, compliance, and change reports are the most valuable. I can clean up firewall rules quickly, optimizing the rule set and moving on in hours. Before, I was looking at days. Compliance is a breeze. The change reports are helpful to see changes over time and also be a "second set of eyes" when looking into issues. 

The mapping tool is helpful. 

Traffic queries are a great help when troubleshooting a problem, especially if the traffic is going through two or more firewalls.

What needs improvement?

I can't think of specific improvements. If anything, the product has been improving in usefulness constantly. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer for approximately two and a half years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Product hotfixes are released regularly and are a breeze to install. I have dealt with other products that always promising to fix bugs, but it takes months or longer for the next patch to appear. AlgoSec is on top of this and in my opinion is a real leader with bug fixes.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is the best that I have ever dealt with. I have yet to have a support engineer tell me that they couldn't fix a problem or that it was sunspots (Cisco TAC). They have gone above and beyond multiple times. I never hesitated to call as they have never made me feel that the problem is the user, even though I am sure that there were times it has been.

I have never had a problem that the technical support wasn't willing to dig into and get resolved.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Not really. We used a homegrown VBScript that would parse the configurations on our firewalls for auditing. This didn't help at all with compliance.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is not difficult. The professional services were outstanding in installation and knowledge transfer.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented through a vendor team. Their expertise was outstanding. They made sure to spend a lot time doing knowledge transfer.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The initial cost was high for us, but we have always been behind the tech curve and cost has always been the limiting factor. That attitude has changed. Now, we look for the best, not simply the cheapest.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did look at a couple of other solutions. FireMon and Qualsys are the only two I remember.

What other advice do I have?

It has saved my bacon a number of times and is a great arrow to have in your quiver of tools.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.