The solution is pretty interesting. It is a very useful product for engineering. That is why we chose it. We can run code and deploy it whenever we want. I understand the configuration. The integration of EFS with other AWS services has been helpful.

I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice. When it comes to designing a system, it's not exactly simple because there are numerous approaches, but I'm fond of the scalability features it offers. I find it appealing. While Azure is similar in many respects, I perceive it as being somewhat less flexible in terms of scalability.   

EFS is flexible. 

The solution doesn't have any size limitations for packages. Also, loading modules from EFS is fast enough. EFS can be easily mounted to an EC2 machine and written to.

Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface.

We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage.