I have seldom faced crashes in AWS. I didn't face any issues with stability. I used to face stability issues four years back. Occasionally, crashes happened, but we had an automated snapshot feature. We could get back up from there. Occasionally, the vendor has a maintenance window during which they change the underlying infrastructure. Sometimes, due to some incompatibility, we face crashes. Otherwise, it is good 90 to 95% of the time.

The solution is stable.

I rate Amazon RDS an eight out of ten for stability.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. It has never crashed on us.

MySQL RDS is very stable. I cannot say that running MySQL on-premise or on EC2 instances is less stable than RDS MySQL. However, when there are hardware issues, if you have RDS MySQL standby "on", you'll appreciate the fail-over solution. 

Amazon RDS is a very stable solution.

I rate Amazon RDS a seven out of ten for stability.

The tool is stable. 

I rate the product’s stability a ten out of ten.

It's a stable product.

It is a stable solution. I rate it eight out of ten. 

It is a pretty stable solution.

Two of our products are in production on RDS, so we use RDS extensively. RDS routers are valid on two of our product suites. And then RDS SQL Server 2016 instance 52 is on many of our client implementations.

RDS is stable. A cloud solution is always stable, and RDS servers are solid.

The solution is quite stable. We haven't seen any issues in the last three years. Since we are using Amazon RDS Multi-AZ, other nodes are available on the machine, even if the solution is down. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

Amazon RDS is a stable product with minimal bugs.

Amazon RDS is a stable solution.

I rate Amazon RDS a nine out of ten for stability.

I have never come across any issues regarding the solution's stability. The database uptime works fine.

It has good availability, and so far, we haven't had any issues with it.

Amazon RDS is stable. I have not had any issues with the stability of this solution.

The stability os really good. I like it.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The stability of Amazon RDS is good.

I rate the stability of Amazon RDS a five out of ten.

The solution is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It doesn't break down.

The stability is good.

Amazon RDS is quite stable.

I found it to be a stable solution.

The stability of the solution depends on the RDS being used. For example, Aurora is not stable but Postgres is. The stability could improve.

It is stable.

I haven't experienced any stability and can therefore say it's reliable and the performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. I haven't had any issues with it so far.

This Solution is very stable, as many customers have witnessed. Responsibility to set up the Amazon VPC, servers, and RDS does take work. This requires a solid AWS (infrastructure): Administrators and networking team. They need to work with the AWS team, following the stringent security guidelines that will help to build stability for the solution. 

The stability of this solution is good. We did have a couple of problems last year when the database was absconded, but luckily we had snapshots available. They take six backups daily and we were able to easily restore. We did not suffer any data loss.

I make use of this solution on a daily basis, especially over the past few years. We are migrating and I do work on the on-premises data centers, which is our core area. But, from a cost perspective, we are working towards hosting our business entirely in AWS.

We've found this solution to be very stable. It's reliable. We don't really deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. So far, it's been very good.

We have not really had stability issues.

We have not had stability problems. It is much more stable than a standard datacenter.

It is stable.