Amazon Redshift Other Solutions Considered
SP
S Paul Choudhury
Senior Economics Analyst at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
Nutanix also provides similar products. It also offers different options for cloud providers.
View full review »TT
reviewer2179353
Soullution Architech at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
One reason we chose this solution is that we are in the process of moving everything to the cloud. But that's not the only reason. My company wanted to consolidate everything into one system, and AWS provided all the necessary information in one place. For example, Lambda is for specific storage and limited membership; all this information is available in one cloud network. This way, data segregation is much faster and easier to use. It's just everything in one cloud network, so we decided to use it.
View full review »We also tried using Athena. However, Redshift was faster.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Amazon Redshift
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon Redshift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MS
reviewer1359915
Service Manager & Solution Architect at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
We are switching to Azure, although not because of the product or the services that we did not like. It's about AWS being competitors for logistic companies that we are working with. Also for security reasons, we do not know how secure the data is on the cloud.
If you are competitors then you don't know if the data can be accessed by your competitor, and the team can be looking at a demographic, which could impact your sales.
View full review »AR
reviewer2002689
VP, Data and Insights at a tech company with 201-500 employees
In my organization, we also use GCP, Amazon EC2, Databricks, and Snowflake. We also have Delta Lakehouse. I'm going to move everything into the Delta Lakehouse. For a company of this size, it's a lot of tools to physically maintain with a small data engineering team.
I think Snowflake has a few more features. In Redshift, you need to write a bit more SQL in some instances, but it's very user-friendly and fast. It can be used as a data warehouse solution as well. It can also do some analytics.
Redshift is comparable to other solutions. I wanted to go with Amazon EC2 because we also have Databricks, and I think I can cover some of those features with the combination of that.
View full review »RR
Raghunandan Rajput
Data Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have been evaluating Snowflake and are in the POC phase. If it passes our quality tests then we will be moving to it soon.
View full review »AG
reviewer1724670
Engineering Manager/Solution architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
I evaluated Cloudera and Azure.
View full review »MS
MadhavanSrinivasan
CEO at Screenit Labs Pvt Ltd
We have also tried Cosmos DB and Azure for our customers, but they were not chosen after the PoC. Azure and AWS have different database offerings and we experimented with both, but the customer ended up in production and we stayed with that.
View full review »We pretty much went with Redshift, as the company migrated everything to AWS. We might have looked at other database options, but we did not put much time into it.
View full review »EM
Eli Misael Manjarrez
DBA at Kimetrics
I started using Amazon Redshift because I started working for this company that was working with both Azure and Amazon. The company eventually moved all to Amazon. I wasn't sure why they didn't continue to use Azure. My experience was more with Microsoft technology so I prefer Azure. But, there are some interesting features in Amazon Redshift that works better. I have also used Oracle Cloud.
View full review »I evaluated Hadoop and Spark, along with Redshift. I have no negative comments about those other products. Redshift is flexible in terms of configuration, maintenance and security, especially VPC configuration, which secures our data a lot.
View full review »For setting up a data warehouse, BigQuery was a serious contender. BigQuery is simpler to setup and scale. It's also more of a black box: you worry less what's inside and how it scales and you get charged for what you consume (which is both a pro and a con). With Redshift, you choose in advance the type of machine you want, like EC2 (resizing your cluster is easy).
View full review »We also looked at the Oracle solution.
View full review »We did not evaluate other options prior to selecting this solution.
View full review »We analyzed Microsoft, Oracle, AWS RDS and Mango DB for our requirements.
View full review »I only provided advice to my customers, but some looked at Azure SQL DW , Greenplum, Netezza, and Google Big Query as possible alternatives
View full review »NW
Nir Wasserman
BI Manager at jfrog
I did not. we did consider using BigQuery Data Analytics, but eventually, we decided to use Redshift.
View full review »We have used different options over the last 20 years. We found AWS Redshift to be the leader in capability and provides an ecosystem of related services from AWS, many of which are free.
View full review »We were thinking about using a self-managed PostgreSQL. We chose Redshift because we didn't need to manage it ourselves and because it integrates with the rest of the AWS services more fluently.
We are currently evaluating Druid.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Amazon Redshift
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon Redshift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.