Amazon Redshift Room for Improvement

AndrewAlangaram
Business Analyst at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It would be useful to have an option where all of the data can be queried at once and then have the result shown. As it is now, when we run a query and we are looking at the results, part of the data remains to be processed at the back end. That works very well, but in some cases, we require the whole data to be queried at once and then have the results shown. We have not faced many use cases where it would have been useful, but in one or two, we used other methods to achieve this goal. When our clients contact customer support, they don't want to speak with a machine. Instead, they want to chat with a real person who can provide a solution. Customer service bots can provide solutions but they cannot understand our problems. View full review »
reviewer1209333
Head of Data Warehouse & Business Intelligence at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
From my perspective, the product could be improved by making it more flexible. There are now more flexible products on the market that allow for expandability and dynamic expansion as the market changes with regard to data warehouses. Although the product is simple to use there can be problems. If you declare some unique key in a column and then store it, the database is going to believe this is what you have and results will be distorted. It's fine if the query is simple but if it's complex or you have too many queries per hour, it can create a bottleneck for Redshift and then you can't return and recover. It requires some fine-tuning. For additional features, I would like to see support for partitions, it doesn't exist yet as a feature. It's quite an important issue when you're dealing with large databases. Also, I believe the product needs improvement in parallel threading to support more database users without jeopardizing performance. View full review »
Shyam Shankar
Senior System Engineer at a software R&D company with 10,001+ employees
Pricing is one of the concerns that I have because if you compare Snowflake with Redshift, it provides some of the same services, but at a much cheaper rate. So pricing is one of the things that it could improve. It should be more competitive. Otherwise, everything else looks good, especially the data storage and analytical processes. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Snowflake Computing, Microsoft and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mediha Šiljić
Chief Information Officer at Sensilab
Compatibility with other products, for example, Microsoft and Google, is a bit difficult because each one of them wants to be isolated with their solutions. That's a big problem now. View full review »
reviewer1221354
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved. View full review »
reviewer1207005
Head of Analytics at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The speed of the solution and its portability needs improvement. View full review »
Andrew Smale
Principal Consultant at Inawisdom
* It would be nice if it was a bit cheaper to retain data long-term. * Should be made available across zones, like other Multi-AZ solutions. View full review »
Nir Wasserman
BI Manager at jfrog
In the next release, a pivot function would be a big help. It could save a lot of time creating a query or process to handle operations. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Snowflake Computing, Microsoft and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.