I have used other solutions such as WS02 and Westworld API Management.

I did not previously use a different solution.

We previously used Mashery. We switched as Apigee was working better.

I haven't used any other solution before Apigee. My company chose to work with Apigee since it offered an enterprise edition, making it an easy-to-maintain solution with live tracking API features.

We're currently using IBM Connect as well as Azure. Functionality-wise, there aren't too many differences. One is on-premises, however, therefore it's really difficult to compare both together. With IBM, you have to maintain a few more things. There are more administrative tasks.

Before Apigee, I used G Data Software, IBM, and more.

We have MuleSoft, but we are only using their ESB, not API management. Apigee is the first solution we are using for API management.

We were using API Connect from IBM before switching to Apigee for better user readiness options.

I have experience with many different platforms such as Mulesoft and Microsoft API Management.

In Azure, I use Azure DevOps and with Mulesoft I use Jira.

In my previous location, I partnered with Microsoft using Azure in API Management.

I previously worked with IBM Connect but I prefer Apigee. It provides all the features and requirements for AI management.

We have used Mule API, Mule API Gateway, and API Manager.

We previously did not use any other solutions.

We did not use a different product previously. 

We didn't use any API management solution.

I used IBM API Connect, but found it easier to work with Apigee.

We are also collaborating with Amazon teams and some of the standardization committees to help standardize APIs.

Apigee was our first choice for this type of product.

We previously used WSO2.

We currently use WSO2 API Manager version 1.9x in production, but the solution is no longer meeting our needs.

The company only used Apigee. It didn't use any other solutions.

We work on multiple API management tools based on the requirement of a particular customer. We have worked on Apigee, Dotcom, MuleSoft, to name a few.

I have used several solutions previously, such as IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager, and many other API solutions.

I am unsure if our clients used a different solution previously. I don't have access to that information.

We use several similar solutions including Mulesoft, SAP, and Azure. Mulesoft is the one that we use the least and try to replace it with other systems. Out of ten customers, we have two using Azure, six using Apigee, and the final two using SAP.

I haven’t quite used any other product in API domain other than Apigee. Although I have worked once with Akana, it was for a different use case altogether.

Previously worked with physical box type solutions. Now using Apigee for API based connectivity along with cloud level access.

No, I have not used any other tools.

Yes, scalability was an issue with the earlier tool.

I did have some previous experience with other products in this category before Apigee, like MuleSoft. The main differences between Apigee and MuleSoft are that Apigee is more lightweight and the licensing is also lesser than the MuleSoft. Based on the use case of big clients, the ones who want more services can get them and because the Apigee solution is more lightweight it offers more possibilities for them to use API solutions.  

With Apigee you can bring in some adapters to work with things like business rule engines. So those might create more standardization and help make the investment in Apigee more valuable.