AppDynamics Database Monitoring Scalability

Joao Guerra - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Management & Automation Manager at Jeronimo Martins

We have 100 AppDynamics Database Monitoring users in our organization. It is a scalable product.

View full review »
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

I rate AppDynamics Database Monitoring a ten out of ten for scalability. More than 1,500 people are using the solution in our organization.

View full review »
KS
Domain Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I rate the tool’s scalability a six out of ten. We run quite a few servers.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Nuno Rosa - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Consultant at Infosys

We work with around 100 AppDynamics Database Monitoring customers.

View full review »
Swapan Biswas - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Consultant at Tata Consultancy

The solution is scalable.

View full review »
MA
Senior Presales/Business Developement at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The tool’s scalability is good. Our customers are enterprise-level businesses such as large hospitals, manufacturers, and banks.

View full review »
Suresh Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
VP - Business Excellence at Tata Consultancy

I give the scalability of AppDynamics Database Monitoring a nine out of ten.

View full review »
JD
Consultant at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

AppDynamics Database Monitoring is a scalable product.

View full review »
VN
Tester at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's definitely scalable. The number of environments in our implementation has been increasing, so it's adaptable. It's a large enterprise, definitely not medium or small.

Maintenance is handled by the maintenance team.

View full review »
DS
Senior Solutions Consultant at VNQ Systems

If you got the on-prem resource, it's very easy to scale out. If you have the full server resources that you need, scalability is very easy.

In terms of its usage, within the bank, its adoption was very difficult. People didn't adopt it very well, but in one of the telecoms, the adoption rate was very good. They had a team of two to three people managing close to 150 users. It was very straightforward to manage.

View full review »
MP
Head of IT Operations at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

In terms of scalability, this solution is good and has worked for us. With our licensing model, each time we have a need or requirement, we have our probes available for new solutions in less than forty-eight hours.

View full review »
LM
Technical Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have more than 100 people using the solution in my organization. We have plans to increase the usage of the solution in the future.

View full review »
RV
Infrastructure Architect -Application Dynamics at Kyndryl

AppDynamics Database Monitoring is a scalable solution. We are monitoring over 200 applications.

View full review »
KJ
Director of Application Performance Monitoring As A Service (MAPS & MSPM) with 11-50 employees

My impression of the scalability of the solution is that it is not very scalable. They are not the market leader anymore. Because they do not have the ability to monitor microservices and containers, I do not see the product having a huge future. For example and for comparison, there is Dynatrace which is a better solution and an easier solution to work with. AppDynamics has failed to lead the way.  

We usually have two engineers on staff for the deployment and maintenance for our clients.  

View full review »
MM
Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The scalability could be improved. There is a limitation in terms of the technology that can be supported. For Example, if you want to implement through Java, that is pretty seamless.

The amount of configuration you get there is actually quite low, so you can pretty much go ahead. However, if you're implementing C++ applications, I think it's going to be very difficult.

View full review »
it_user560532 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

We haven't really had the need to scale it. We're in the early part of the journey in our AppDynamics deployment, but we will soon be going there. We still have to get to that point.

View full review »
Jalpesh Shelar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Analyst at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

AppDynamics Database Monitoring is scalable.

View full review »
LP
Senior Database Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have approximately 30 to 40 end-users using AppDynamics Database Monitoring. We do not have plans to increase the number of end-users.

View full review »
VK
Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We have found this to be a scalable solution.

View full review »
PS
Associate Principal Consultant at BRavura

I haven't personally faced any issues with scaling. However, we have a limited number of licenses available. We've been allocated four licenses to monitor four different items. Therefore, I don't have the availability to scale currently.

View full review »
AH
Consultant APM et Performance with 10,001+ employees

The solution does not offer good scalability. It's quite technical, but basically, when we have to monitor one database we have to check if our Java program allows for the amount of monitoring we need. If it doesn't, we'll need to restart and get more database agents and perhaps spend more money to scale.

We don't have a lot of users on the solution on the database monitoring portion. It might be as many as 20 people. They are software engineers and database admins.

We only use the solution occasionally when we suspect there are problems on the database side. It isn't used daily.

View full review »
PM
QA Specialist at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

In terms of scalability, you may need a bit more resources in terms of hardware to scale the solution properly. The solution collects a lot of data, so you need a lot of capacity to handle it. However, if you are on the cloud, I believe there would be fewer restrictions. 

We have 50 people on the solution and we use it every day.

View full review »
LM
Technical Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The solution is pretty easy to scale.

View full review »
AS
Senior IT Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

The solution is scalable.

View full review »
WA
Business Transformation Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's scalable, but it comes with a cost if you add more applications. Technically, it is scalable, but from a cost perspective, it costs much more if you add more. 

They can monitor billions of transactions because they're not monitoring all transactions. They're monitoring samples. So, they can offer good monitoring for the huge sites.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.