Appian is a highly stable platform.

I rate the stability of Appian an eight out of ten.

It is as stable as you make it. If you're following good software development practices throughout the process and you're doing good checks and balances and maintaining solid architecture principles, then it is pretty stable. If you don't do that coming into it and you don't establish COE in standards, you can definitely get yourself into trouble.

Appian is stable. 

It's a stable solution. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is a stable product. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We have not faced any challenges with respect to the platform in the last two years. 

Appian is a very stable solution. We've never faced any huge glitches or bugs with the solution.

I rate Appian ten out of ten for stability.

We'd had no issues in the past three years. It is stable. 

Appian is stable because it is on the cloud and it has options, actions, and latency. 

Appian is a stable solution, so I'm giving it a nine out of ten.

It is pretty stable.

The solution is very stable and reliable. It is innovative. The customers I have been working with choose Appian based on its innovation and reliability.

Appian is very, very stable. Thousands of organizations use it. It's got 99.99% uptime in AWS. It's very robust. I didn't encounter any problems with it.

I won't be complaining near the client. Stability-wise, everything is okay.

The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well.

It's my understanding that the solution is stable. We haven't dealt with bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.

We had some concerns with the stability of Appian when we had a lot of cases. During normal operation it is a stable solution.

We've only had one 15-minute downtime incident that was related to an AWS hardware issue in their 1AZ. That wasn't Appian's fault. That was it. It's been pretty stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. I'd rate the solution's stability nine out of ten. 

Appian is stable.

I have found Appian to be stable.

This solution is very stable and robust. The updates definitely work. I've never had to roll back an update.

Stability depends on the development. If you do proper development the stability is okay. Whenever you are getting data from the database, you have to write more code rules, more views. It will take a long time. Going forward, you can have performance issues. Initially, it works fine, but going forward, you are hitting performance issues whenever you create the views to get the data from the database. That's what I found in my previous project.

Very few.

The solution is stable.

I'm happy about the stability. It looks promising for me.

I can't predict how many developers it requires. It really depends on the type and size of the app and the capability of the developers.

We run a one-hour workshop from scratch. My developer can create the users' data, custom data types, a small UI, and a nice flow and read right from the databases easily. In one hour, he can complete as many tasks that normally take many days.

The solution is stable.

No, we have not encountered any significant stability issues with Appian. The product is very stable across all its different versions.

The stability and performance are good. Appian is focusing a lot on this because they recently came out with a Kubernetes system acquisition, which is providing them the ability to scale as well as an expansion model that can be as stable as required. The performance is very good, as this solution is available across multiple cloud systems. 

As far as maintenance, it's pretty straightforward because Appian, as a company, comes with very mature hotfixes when required, as well as seamless upgrades. As long as you do not do any customizations—which is not recommended—it is pretty easy and straightforward to maintain, and does not take much effort. 

The stability is good. We have been using Appian for our strategy and tactical solutions and it has held up very well for us. The team was able to adapt to the changes of the new version  very quickly and were able to implement the application without any complexities or jumping hurdles relating to development. There were no issues for us. Appian has been meeting just as many of the requirements in my department as the stakeholders have. The stakeholders are happy with the UI and ease of the application. The overall usability has improved and everyone is happy with Appian. 

The solution has been pretty stable. I haven't had any downtime whatsoever, or any disruptions or anything of that nature. There hasn't been any lag in service. It's been good.

Appian virtually has a 99.99% uptime rating. It's very stable. 

The solution is stable. There sometimes is downtime during upgrades, however, it is reliable. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

Appian is stable.

Appian is a stable solution.

We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in. The scale-out should be improved as we grapple with more workloads and users.

We feel the latency could further be reduced, but the access time for the throughput time or the general access time could be further reduced. 

I rate the software’s stability a nine out of ten.

The platform is super stable in BPMS and rules execution. 

Issues can appear in the following ways, related to development and design choices:

1. The underlying database is facing locking or performance issues. The instability of the database is very quickly propagated in the flows and forms executions (Appian engines/application server) and the platform can become non-responsive, experience deteriorating performance, or create numerous exceptions in running processes.
2. If the platform is used for data-intensive tasks, especially in deep nesting of data manipulation rules, the performance can quickly be affected and may also lead to exceptions.
3. If you don't follow the Appian best practices, and your application is scaling up, then on pick times the performance will be bad or exceptions may occur. This situation can be avoided by identifying potential issues by running the health check diagnostic tool.

The stability was satisfactory. We did have some issues regarding the connectivity. For example, in the conference room, there is no connection anywhere. We sometimes lose connection even when we don't have problems with our network. It's very strange. We don't know why this happens.

As a person that's more in development, I've never tested the stability or noted any weakness in its reliability.

Not much, but sometimes very minor issues on tier 0, 1 applications.

The solution is stable. 

It is a stable product.

No issues with stability.

It is a stable solution. 

It's very stable. We have not experienced any problems with it.

Stability problems are usually only experienced when architecture and development are done by people who don't know the tool and its best practices very well.

Appian is stable as long as the design is properly worked on or the architectural design is based on the best practice. I think the best practices are being cascaded to us as a partner and with our clients as well.

The stability of this solution is good.

This is a stable solution.

No issues.