ARCON Privileged Access Management Scalability
The solution is scalable. I have provided this solution to almost ten customers, including multiple government banks.
View full review »I'm handling the solution for all types of companies. So, it is not like I am only involved in small or medium businesses. From scratch itself, I am involved with all types of businesses.
KR
reviewer2166330
Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It is scalable. There are around 500 users who work with Arcon in my organization.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON, CyberArk, Broadcom and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The scalability is good and we have around ten thousand users currently.
View full review »ARCON Privileged Access Management is a scalable solution that takes a long time to scale. Around 20 administrators are using ARCON Privileged Access Management in our organization.
View full review »GR
Gavin Romario
Solution Engineer-Cyber Security at Asia Pacific Technology Systems Pvt Ltd
When it comes to scalability, ARCON PAM is generally good. However, a bit more clarity on how the licensing handles additional privileged users would be beneficial.
My clients using ARCON PAM typically fall into the SMB category, with user numbers usually less than 500.
View full review »We have approximately 100 people in my organization using this solution.
We have over 200 servers and storage systems using this solution. The solution is scalable.
View full review »JM
reviewer1384740
Project Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
This is absolutely scalable. We currently have 90 users out of 150 employees and we aim to increase that by the next quarter. It was delayed because of Covid.
Earlier they were having issues, only releasing upgrades quarterly. Now they have changed the frequency to monthly, for about the last six months. So that is some kind of improvement.
Updates are not a problem, our in-house team is capable of implementing them, even without support from the company. They provide documentation with the technical dependencies and the steps.
View full review »It is scalable.
View full review »This is a highly scalable solution.
This product can be good in a small enterprise but when the environment is too big, it will be difficult to implement. It is only good for banks. For certain environments, it is very bad.
View full review »PY
Praveen Yadav
Information Security Professional at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The scalability depends on the internal hardware. The software can handle a number of users and a number of servers. We started with about 100 servers. Now, we are around 900 servers. We have not found any issue in terms of scalability.
View full review »AP
Consulta3e37
Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Our kiosk structure is a very good structure. It will just connect to a server and show you the screen.
View full review »SB
Sanjeet Kumar Bhuyan
Security Consultant and Cybersecurity Support at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Not yet, although a couple of our requirements were solved with the next patch release.
View full review »RY
SystemsEa521
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We haven't had any scalability issues.
View full review »AI
HeadOfIn0e84
Head of Information Security & Risk Assurance at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We have never faced any issues with scalability. This product is scalable enough. There are:
- Any number of services that you can add.
- Any number of users who can use it.
- Any number of infrastructure devices which can be added.
AK
Anumod Kaimal
Senior Officer- Information Security at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
It is a scalable product.
A year ago, our infrastructure was on-premise. Then, we moved to the cloud infrastructure. Even during that time, it was very easy for us to move this application and database from on-premise to cloud, as well as configure new things, such as load balancing. The product is very compatible.
When we transitioned from our on-premise to the cloud environment, and even during the transition period, we did not face any challenges or any problems with this product. There was just minor tweaking that we had to do with the new features on the cloud, like failover, as well as autoscaling.
View full review »We never had scalability issues. The primary issue will be storing the logs. The storage is attached to the SAN, so whenever there is a space crunch, in terms of storing the logs, we just increase the SAN storage. That's it. In terms of computer requirements, we never had an issue in terms of performance.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »VS
reviewer1371597
Data Entry Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is scalable, but the security level doesn't increase. That might be an issue for larger companies and continues to be an issue for us. Still, we consider it to be a very good product.
We use this product quite extensively and on a daily basis.
View full review »We found the product is scalable if we provide the recommended hardware by the vendor.
View full review »FH
Farhad Hussain
Senior Consultant (e-Governance) Leveraging ICT for Growth, Employment and Governance at Bangladesh Computer Council
Good.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »Yes it is scalable, it has capacity to scale up and expand.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON, CyberArk, Broadcom and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.