ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Previous Solutions
I have used IBM Security QRadar, Splunk , and even RSA Network.
Product-wise, RSA Network doesn't support multi-tenancy, while both IBM Security QRadar and ArcSight do. This allows us to manage multiple customers within a single setup. However, Splunk and LogRhythm are not multi-tenant.
Currently, most companies are starting to offer multiple cybersecurity solutions. So, within a single setup, they can now provide solutions for all their customers.
View full review »I used Securonix but decommissioned it because we didn't like it.
We also used LogRhythm.
View full review »DB
DavidBrown13
Security Operations Director at Axon Technologies
We migrated off of QRadar to ArcSight. We switched for better performance, capability, and usability.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I also use Splunk and sometimes Sentinel.
This is the oldest SIM I have been working on. After that, Splunk came into the market. I worked for Accenture, and Splunk gave free training because of the partnership with Accenture. Their training framework was good compared to ArcSight. A lot of people started switching to Splunk. Nobody's support is perfect, but Splunk's support is almost perfect and better than ArcSight.
The primary factor is the cost. ArcSight is cost-effective, but Splunk is not because it charges for UBA, and ArcSight charges on EPS. Splunk is also in automation and machine-learning tools. So, if a customer is willing to spend big so they can switch to Splunk, that's what I've seen for most of the clients.
View full review »We have not use a previous solution past its initial evaluation period.
View full review »PM
PeterMendonca
Sr. Group Manager at WNS Global Services
I have used McAfee Nitro, IBM QRadar, and DNIF HyperCloud. Other solutions aren't as simple to set up or as stable. ArcSight is better in terms of coverage. The technology is more than 20 years old.
I am a Sr. Principal Architect and design and go with the best solution for the customer, currently deploying a solution around Logstash, elasticsearch and kibana.
View full review »
This is the first solution that we have used for monitoring.
View full review »I have used QRadar and Splunk. Both have great functionality that make them easy to use, but ArcSight has a very consistent layout and their logic is easy to figure out.
View full review »We mainly use HP ArcSight, but also Splunk. I didn't have a say in making the choices.
View full review »RS
reviewer2159517
Mdr of Presales & Customer Success Head at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
I have worked with QRadar and McAfee.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »Since I have been in the organisation, we have used Micro Focus ArcSight for 80% of the clients. We have also used Splunk for certain clients based on their requirements.
View full review »SS
reviewer1069233
Principal Enterprise Architect (Technology, Cloud & Security) at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
I have worked with IBM QRadar. IBM QRadar is very expensive, and it is not easy to deploy like ArcSight. It can't be deployed without an SME. ArcSight is better than IBM QRadar.
View full review »We moved from a managed outsource service, provided by a competitor. He wanted to in-source it, or in-house it, so we had the ability to be a little bit more effective and nimble.
View full review »
No, the folks I work for were at ArcSight before HP acquired it and have always been users and proponents of it. It's a powerful product for sure.
View full review »
We also use Splunk to compare features. ArcSight is the favorite solution for my organization.
View full review »I have used RSA enVision, QRadar and Splunk. ArcSight is better than them all when it comes to filtering, normalization, aggregation, dashboards, reporting and correlation, multi-tenancy and custom devices support.
View full review »I was not using any other solution previously.
View full review »Previously, I worked with IBM QRadar.
View full review »HM
Hatem Metwally
Senior Security Consultant, CISSP, HPE ArcSight Specialist at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees
SW
reviewer987771
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We did not use a solution prior to ArcSight ESM.
View full review »We have evaluated several solutions and HPE ArcSight was the only one that satisfied our requirements in performance, scalability, and flexibility.
View full review »VN
Velly Nusmir
Senior Manager at PT Permata Anugerah Abadi
We are using SIEM. It has a better dashboard and is more complete.
View full review »FS
technica402861
Senior Manager - Cyber Security at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The threat landscape was the trigger for needing a SIEM product to correlate everything that is going on within the environment.
View full review »AB
reviewer1342554
Associate Vice President at a consumer goods company with 201-500 employees
We didn't previously use a different solution. This is the first product for us that we use in this particular way.
View full review »I have also used LogRhythm, which in my opinion has less features than ArcSight. 80% of use cases work well on both, for the most interesting 20%, I would use ArcSight.
View full review »I have not used any other solution. In 2005, we started directly with the HPE ArcSight solution because our company security consultant recommended it.
View full review »We were not using any other solution before. We started using HPE ArcSight straightaway.
View full review »I have used many products that cover some of the territory claimed by ArcSight, including: Sourcefire 3D, ELSA, Sguil/Squert, RSA Security Analytics and Splunk. None of these were as comprehensive as ArcSight.
View full review »As a systems integrator, we constantly evaluate different solutions and deploy not one but many of them. My personal opinion is that a crucial feature for a SIEM system is flexibility. The more you can tune, adjust, and develop the system, you will get more profit from it. If we're talking about SIEM solutions, then no one can offer such flexibility as ArcSight. Splunk maybe, but Splunk is not SIEM, and to get SIEM-like features from it you spend more time and money.
View full review »GS
ProductS9907
Product Specialist Security Solutions at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We worked with RSA enVision/RSA SA as a partner:
- RSA enVision was very basic and was very hard to fine-tune.
- RSA SA (logs/packets) is more oriented towards packets/investigation and lacks multiple features when only using it for log management/SIEM.
Well we have different tools out there, but the most common ones everybody's going to know about is Splunk. Feature, function and price was why we switched When we're able to actually deliver the similar features and functions, add in additional intellectual property from HPE with respect to decision trees of ArcSight and being able to take tangible actions on the stuff that's coming inbound, that's great. Other tools can do that. Now you're just talking about price in the industry. We're able to deliver the same features and functionality at a lower cost to the client, typically we'll win with ArcSight.
View full review »We previously used RSA enVision. We had issues with the report generation.
View full review »
I have been working with ArcSight since I started my career.
View full review »
I have worked on multiple SIEM products. I work as a Senior Security Analyst and have a minimal role in deciding the solution. I only work where it is explicitly an HP ArcSight environment or deployment.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.