We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Aternity AppInternals OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Aternity AppInternals is the #33 ranked solution in our list of APM tools. It is most often compared to AppDynamics: Aternity AppInternals vs AppDynamics

What is Aternity AppInternals?

Simplified high-definition monitoring that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies APM visibility across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem.

Aternity AppInternals is also known as SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Application Performance Management (APM) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: October 2021

Aternity AppInternals Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Aternity AppInternals Video

Aternity AppInternals Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
JS
IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update

Pros and Cons

  • "As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."
  • "It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

What is most valuable?

The application side of the solution is its most valuable aspect. We are using it on the logs that were captured on the application side. 

As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues.

What needs improvement?

Right now, our challenge is that we don't have the support we need, and based on the requirements we have, there are some audits and it turns out that the AppInternals agent is causing false trafficking issues.

We could not update the server requirements on the version we have right now, due to the support. 

It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been working with the solution for three or four years now. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's not updated to the latest version, due to the fact that if we do that it will crash or cause some issues. Because we don't have a new AP version, we have just direct production. If our management accepts the risk, then we might do the upgrade of the server as well as its application version. Currently, we are using a two-year-old version of the solution. It is not up to date.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The server-based scalability is a challenge, however, we cannot change anything, including the scale, unless the management decides to take the risk and update the solution.

How was the initial setup?

We're running it in a Linux bot. I'm not sure if I would describe the process as complex. On our side is basically in-house, so it's a pretty standard installation process. Whatever servers that we have provide talks to the app servers which talk to the database servers. The setup is intranet-based and not internet-based. That makes our setups rather simple and straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We handle everything in house using our own team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't know the exact pricing, however, my understanding is that it's quite expensive. Dynatrace has competitive pricing in comparison. I believe Cisco pricing is also okay.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We recently increased to another license. That said, for other teams to be involved in what we do, including network and infrastructure, we've decided to look into Dynatrace, which is a more complete system.

We are looking at Dynatrace based on some information that we've gotten from websites as well as some other experiences from our colleagues. Our manager also has previous experience on the solution. We're now in the POC stage and are awaiting the arrival of the hardware to get started.

Before this product, I recommended the Sophos Manage Engine. Management did not consider it because it's from India.

What other advice do I have?

We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator.

At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well.

Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity.

The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues.

From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. 

I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete.

I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PAUL JOSEPHS
Security & Performance Analytics Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Points out the relevant problems in the enterprise and it's easy to understand

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."
  • "I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise.

What needs improvement?

I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Riverbed for several years now. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability could be improved in terms of the number of technologies that you can use it with.

The people using is a small amount, just our enterprise. The users are mostly admin.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Foglight before this solution. The reason we switched is because Quest Foglight was a bit of a complex platform and not really delivering the visibility that was required.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex, but it's not as smooth as it could be. 

The deployment takes a couple of days, but it's the ongoing deployment of the agents that's the issue.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

My advice to someone considering this solution is to do a proof of concept. Clearly identify what it is you actually want a product of this nature to do. How grandly do you want to get into the data sets?

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.