As I said, the largest environment i was working with at a customer has 100+ authors and I imagine plenty of pages and other content - sadly I do not know the exact figures - but we never had reason to complain in our project which only consisted of 12 people actively using Confluence. So I guess scalability should not be an issue.

It is scalable and expands well. 

We have 42 people using the solution. We do have plans to increase usage. 

The scalability is fine on-premises. We had some issues with the scalability on the cloud.

The product scales well. 

We started at 100 users and have since scaled to 300 users. We will continue to increase usage. 

We have more than 15,000 users on it. There were no problems with the solution's speed.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Around 20 to 30 percent of my company's clients are enterprise-sized businesses, while the rest of our customers consist of medium-sized businesses.

Around 12 clients are using Atlassian Confluence.

I rate Atlassian Confluence ten out of ten for scalability.

The scalability of Atlassian Confluence is very good when I see how many people are using it. There could be up to 1,000 users using the solution. 

Atlassian Confluence is scalable, and usable from anywhere, as well as from my phone. There are various Confluence or Jira applications, I can access the data immediately anytime I want.

We have multiple projects and half of my colleagues are using it. We have approximately 25 users in our organization.

We have plans to increase our usage. 

We intend to extend it throughout the entire organization. We want to conduct certain HR initiatives on Jira as well. 

Our HR department may also collaborate with them and Jira. I believe it is a useful tool.

This is a scalable solution. It is built on a crop base and so adding additional documents is simple. 

The solution is scalable and it's centrally controlled, and we have a couple of central responsibility roles for adding new users. It's helpful for us on the backend because if we want to provide access to different sets of people, some may need edit access, some may need read-only access, and we utilize those different permissions.

Confluence is scalable on both the cloud and server data center. On the cloud, you can even go up to 10,000 users, which was not the case three or four years ago.

We have nearly 300 users. We do our assignment reports on it, and some use it in sales. Managed services staff use it to share information with clients. It is used by everyone.

The scalability of the solution is pretty good. I would rate the scalability as a seven or eight out of nine. 

I would say that Atlassian Confluence is scalable we have more than one thousand users.

We have not had a problem scaling up Atlassian Confluence.

We have approximately 300 people using the solution in my company. We all use it on a daily basis.

I would rate the scalability high. 

The solution is very easy to scale, especially because it's easy to interface with other applications. In my project at the bank we have over 100 users; my client has thousands of users. 

The scalability is enough for our use cases. It covers all our needs. 

I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good. I rate its scalability a nine out of ten.

The scalability of the solution is amazing. It supports a lot of pages and it's very helpful. I give it a nine out of ten. 

Approximately 300 people are using Atlassian Confluence within my business unit and there are around 1,000 users in the company. 

We have 50 people on the solution and we have no plans to increase usage. I can't, therefore, really speak to the scalability potential.

The system has incredible scalability. I have not used all of the features that OMB provides, but we have an integrated system with:

• Collaboration & Information Sharing
• Data Collection
• Analysis
• Publications
• Specialized Applications
• PaaS
• Records Management
• Publishing
• Business Intelligence
• Workflow
• Web Frameworks
• Common Database
• Identity and Provisioning

You need extra time and money to make it useful for a large number of people.

We have 125 Atlassian Confluence users in our organization. We use the tool every day. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten. The lack of a collaboration feature affects the scalability level.

Confluence's scalability is good and can handle many parallel users.

Atlassian Confluence is scalable.

The scalability is not so good, but it's enough for us because our company is small. We have 30 users. However, we have customers who have 10,000 people on Confluence, and then it becomes a problem.

I don't know how scalable it is, but it's enough for 10 or 20 partners of companies to use it online.

In our company, especially with the development teams, we had more than 100 people using the solution.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The tool is suitable for all types of companies. Many enterprise-level companies use Atlassian Confluence because they have lengthy processes that run for years. The aforementioned area prompts enterprises to choose Atlassian Confluence for their documentation.

No issues.

I’m not aware of any scalability issues, but then I’m a “user” of the service and I no longer run an instance.

The solution is scalable, we have around 600 users. We'll probably expand usage to new areas. 

When it comes to scalability you can add as many documents and sites as you like. We currently have around two thousand users 

This solution is scalable. 

It can be used by as many team members as you want to collaborate. It is no problem.

The scalability is great. If your workload grows, it can easily match it. 

We have 700 to 800 people using the solution right now in our organization. HR, production managers, and more are typically on the solution. Pretty much everyone uses it. 

There were no scalability issues.

This is a very scalable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

We haven't had any problems with scalability. We have about 300 users.

Confluence is scalable. Our company has 1,000 employees, and we're growing. It has kept pace with our growth. 

It seems highly scalable. There are 500 end users using this solution. 

We have IT, service desk agents, and regular users across different functions. Everyone is using it. For example, if someone needs to look up documentation or assistance with workflows, they would use Confluence.

It's used alongside Jira. Each team would likely have a Jira code for that purpose.

Atlassian Confluence is a scalable tool. We use the solution across lots of teams, not only on-premise but through remote access. We currently have approximately 100 users in the organization. 

Our company is not that big so we haven't needed to scale. 

It is scalable.

Stability issues were caused by an increased user load, i.e., scalability.

Atlassian Confluence appears to be quite scalable based on the applications that I have seen.

It is difficult to estimate since we are an international company with, I believe, 2,000 employees in Belgium. It is possible that we have 100 users.

600 people are using the solution currently.

While the solution is scalable, we had an issue with each user. For example, users are not able to log into their applications on the cloud. Only on the cloud do we face this issue.

We have 1100 users.

No. We were having issues but that was because we hadn’t configured properly.

This is a scalable solution. 

The pricing model is too steep for us to really use it for everything.

I have found Atlassian Confluence to be scalable.

We had approximately 25 people using this solution in my organization.

We have not had any scalability issues.

It's an on-demand service.

We are constantly watching scalability and are a bit worried but believe the costs of the new Data Center version cost prohibitive.

Confluence's scalability is okay, but you have some performance problems when you're working with too many people. 

I assume the scalability of the solution is good. My company has used it for several years now. We've been growing in that time and we haven't had any kind of stability issues and we've never felt like the solution has gotten too small to meet our needs. It grows with us. We've been able to utilize it as we've needed, as we've grown. It seems to scale nicely.

We currently have approximately 200 users and have not experienced any difference in performance from when we had 10 users.

The team more than doubled in the last couple of years, and we didn't have any issues with scalability. It was very smooth.

The scalability is pretty good.  

We did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I have not had any scalability issues.

We have about 15 users on the solution currently.

Not yet.

No, not yet.

None

This product is scalable.

Up to now it performs ok. We are at 300,000 issues. Getting the impression that it will get tight now.

Haven't had any issues with scalability.

It can be easily scaled up to different levels if used wisely.

We have not encountered any scalability issues, i.e., if you have enough IT resources.

There have not been many scalability issues.

As above plus the available users are based on license.

The solution is scalable, we currently have about two hundred users who are senior employees within our IT department.

With respect to our experiences with Confluence, we haven't had any issues; however, we definitely have had issues within the Jira environment back in 2014.

Scalability issues should have been fixed by now - they arose back in 2010-2014 at one of the largest enterprise implementations for multi-1.000s of concurrent users on the system, causing the system to operate very slow - I would expect that by 2020 this is treated accordingly to make the system scale without loss of performance. 

I did not encounter many scalability issues.

Just in respects of how we structure our content. Confluence is perfectly scalable.

We didn’t have scaling issues once our company established its best use of the system and scaled from there.

This solution is very scalable.

We ostensibly moved from cloud to server, because of functionality not being available on cloud, but also because there are storage limits that don't support enterprise level usage on the cloud.

There are no scalability issues to my knowledge. As of now, we run one instance in production and another instance in a test environment.

No, the product has scalability up to 2000 users.

We have not had any scalability issues.

No issues with scalability.

No, we did not encounter any issues with scalability.