Aurea CX Messenger Competitors and Alternatives

The top Aurea CX Messenger competitors are
  • ActiveMQ
  • Mule ESB
  • IBM MQ
Read reviews of Aurea CX Messenger competitors and alternatives
Anonymous User
Real User
Large System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 23 2016

What is most valuable?

Obviously, the biggest thing is that we’ll never lose a message. We use it for a lot of real-time information between our systems for... more»

How has it helped my organization?

It's reliable. It's a solid foundation. It’s always up and running. MQ doesn't crash on us. It gives us the stability of the platform to be able... more»

What needs improvement?

The user interface might be an area with room for improvement, but we use MQ Explorer and that helps solve a lot of our problems there. On my... more»

Which solutions did we use previously?

I was partially involved in the decision process to invest in MQ. We were not previously using something else. We were actually early adopters,... more»

What other advice do I have?

Take a look at it. It's well worth the effort to play with it and to understand it.
Mule ESB Logo
MuleSoft
Surendranath C
Real User
Principal Architect And Management Council Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Aug 21 2017

What do you think of Mule ESB?

What is most valuable?: In order of importance: - Connectors - Data Weave - Mule Expression Language • How has it helped my organization?: It has changed our approach towards integration, making plumbing functions such as HTTP/Messaging listener services, data transformation and connection handling redundant. • What needs improvement?: Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome. • For how long have I used the solution?: 1 year as a developer and architect. • What was my experience with deployment of the solution?: Deployment of custom flows is troublesome and fraught with difficulty
ActiveMQ Logo
Apache
SrSysAdmin818
Real User
Senior System Administrator for Cloud Operations at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Feb 26 2017

What is most valuable?

* Price point and licensing are the most valuable features relative to our previous MQ solution (Websphere MQ). *... more»

How has it helped my organization?

This product enabled development teams at my previous organization to R&D much quicker with JMS based applications,... more»

What needs improvement?

Apache ActiveMQ needs some improvement playing with multi-platform message clients. It already plays really well with... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This solution is awesome from both perspectives.

Which solutions did we use previously?

We previously used WebSphere MQ and switched mainly due to licensing costs.

What other advice do I have?

If possible, use the Docker image that Apache foundation builds!

Sign Up with Email