AutoSys Workload Automation Scalability
AutoSys Workload Automation's ability to scale and handle large volumes of data is extremely good.
I would rate the scalability of AutoSys Workload Automation nine out of ten.
View full review »GD
GovardhananDevendran
Technical Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
AutoSys Workload Automation is a scalable product, and my company also has the facility to expand it with multiple instances.
View full review »You can scale the product. There are no issues. The only thing is, in terms of the number of machines you need to add, agents will need to be installed. For those who wish to scale, maybe the licensing with the number of agents, maybe constraints are not that good. However, it can scale.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
AutoSys Workload Automation
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AutoSys Workload Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I'll have to reserve judgment on scalability for now.
View full review »AG
reviewer1090398
Head - Consumer Insurance at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
It is used pretty much across all enterprise areas. We have six or seven business units with more than 10,000 people who are using this solution. Application-wise, close to 500 applications are using this solution.
View full review »Our implementation is not that huge on it. It's a couple of small instances of Workload Automation that do a lot of work. From a scalability perspective, I enjoy the fact that, when we scale our networks – we have our servers that actually perform the work out in disparate parts of the company – we don't have to bring the whole infrastructure in. The application server layer of the product line really allows you to centralize the control, without having to have direct, direct contact to every single component out there. It's a nice tiered approach. I see it that the scalability is in line with where I see our company going.
View full review »MB
Manideep Batchu
Application Support Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I rate AutoSys Workload Automation ten out of ten for scalability.
View full review »Obviously, scalability is dependent on the mainframe MIPS. If you need more to run the jobs, once it's running jobs, it's out of CA 7's control. We haven't any performance issues, any time recently, of it not being able to get jobs into the cues.
SK
Santhosh_Kumar
Senior Associate - HR at State Street Corporation
AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable.
View full review »HS
reviewer1729491
Executive Director at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We are using AutoSys for very large-scale deployment, and it is very scalable. It is capable of handling 10,000 jobs on a daily basis. It is very good.
We have more than a hundred users, and it is being used at the corporate level. We are trying to use something like this in the cloud. I don't think we are going to expand the usage of AutoSys because we are thinking of moving to the cloud. We are trying to see which solutions provide similar functionality but support the cloud environment.
View full review »DV
SrITInfr9969
Sr IT Infrastructure Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
No issues with scalability.
View full review »Just 8-10 people are using it as we're not a big shop.
View full review »We have not encountered any issues with scalability.
View full review »DC
Donna Conley
Autosys Admin at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We are huge, so it is very scalable. We are probably one of their biggest customers.
View full review »It's our impression that we're probably one of the larger installations in the world. We have two instances controlling our Canada operation; it’s really Canada and the rest of the world. It was suggested that we spin up the second instance, but we really haven't seen a good reason for doing that, other than we keep some of the competing lines of business separated. Other than that, it seems to scale really well and we can keep going with it.
View full review »It has been easily scalable. CA helped us build the Workload Automation infrastructure that we knew we were going to grow into. It was really a partnership between the two of us to make sure we were scaled correctly. We do about 10,000 jobs a week, a couple hundred thousand a month.
View full review »Scalability just depends; it depends on how much you want to spend.
The beauty of some of the product is that they license by agent. Our ETL agent runs thousands of jobs on one server, so we don't have to pay per job. Generally, when they need to put in a hundred new ETL jobs, it's no big deal. We put it in, it runs, everything runs well and does what it's supposed to do.
View full review »The solution is scalable. They are creating products to help us use GUI interfaces. They are helping us to monitor the system better and keep it going.
View full review »It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers.
View full review »The scalability is awesome because we use it for the mainframe schedule as well as distributive schedule.
View full review »SJ
SrSystem3e20
Sr. Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is a 10 out of 10.
View full review »SP
ScottPeters
Consultant at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It seems to be there. I think we have some issues that we need to address with lag and latency. We have two instances of production AutoSys and we want to collapse that into one, so we want to work with CA to figure out a better solution of how to use the single instance to process all our workload.
View full review »Scalability, it's all based on the agents, so we have to place all these agents on different servers. That seems to be doable, so we haven't had any problems with scalability.
View full review »No problems with scalability. That's actually one of the competitive advantages with this product - the scalability and its ability to do the throughput we need without having any delays. We have scaled as far as we can grow. I've been talking to other companies that are much larger. I'm confident it could scale if we had a tenfold growth and we'd still be okay.
View full review »No problems with scalability at all. Our centralized AutoSys server are running processes, jobs on several hundred client machines without a problem, without a problem at all. We foresee a growth in that as time goes on over the next year or so.
View full review »AR
reviewer1674351
IT consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
We have approximately 15 administrations who use this solution, but the tool is made to work for all the infrastructure of the organization, we could have more users.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »In terms of scalability, right now we're a new customer so we haven't scaled it up to other applications yet, but we are planning to. We've opened it up for our Windows environment and they are enjoying it right now. That's a very small group, for right now, but we plan on adding close to 15,000 servers to it. So it's going to benefit us a lot.
Scalability is actually what supports our decision to go with it. Being able to go from supporting one organization to all our organizations across the company, has been great.
View full review »We don't have any problems with scalability either. That seems to be fine for us.
View full review »It scales fine for us.
View full review »I do not really deal with that much. Basically, we have four processes running on four different environments.
View full review »The product is very scalable. With the way we have ours set up, it allows for rapid extension, if needed, but we have never maximized our systems.
View full review »The scalability - it is really good. I mean there are other products which do play the similar roles but having this workload automation in place and having a different product integrating with it whenever there is a need, you have a Windows shop today and tomorrow now most of the clients are trying to migrate from Windows to Unix. When we have that shift change happening, adding more clients and having more support for this operating systems to schedule this systems, this is really playing a lot of help in the scalability of managing this product.
View full review »The system itself is not scalable but you can add multiple connections into it. You can use the APIs to integrate with other systems.
View full review »No issues at all. In fact, that's actually one of the, I would say, competitive advantages of this product, the scalability and its ability to do the throughput we would need without having any delays.
We've scaled with it as far as we can grow. I've been talking to other companies that are much larger. I'm confident it could scale. If we had a tenfold growth, we'd still be okay.
View full review »We’ve never had any issues. We run over 300,000 jobs a day and we have thousands of end users, at least 10,000 who can evaluate their flows and manage schedules.
View full review »We have not encountered any scalability issues with the supported versions.
View full review »No, not really. We've had no issues with scaling it.
View full review »As I said, we have agents, our servers, in other locations in different cities and in different countries. We are able to contact with those, schedule batch runs on those and bring the results back to Houston as far as the successes or the failures of those processes.
View full review »It meets our scalability needs.
View full review »It is scalable, but we're probably not using it to the best of our ability. We might be migrating to CA Workload Automation iDash.
View full review »Our total number of jobs grew about five-fold. We used to have about 100,000 jobs a month. Now we have about a half million jobs a month.
View full review »MS
Muthu S
Architect at Sight Spectrum
AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable.
We plan to increase our usage of the solution.
View full review »Scalability is a nine out of 10.
View full review »TJ
Teresa Johnson
Senior Operations Analyst at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
No issues.
View full review »We have not pushed it to its limit.
View full review »I have not encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »It's very scalable. There's no problem there.
View full review »The tool can probably handle way bigger stuff than what we are doing.
We are a gas distribution company, but we also own other companies. We are only using this at one of our locations where there are several million customers. We are firing off jobs that are billing those customers, managing meter readings, and various other billing-related financials and lettering processes. We are not at a Netflix or American Airlines level. I am pretty sure we have way more capacity in the product then what we are using.
We're currently crossing over into another insurance underwriting software product, and I see no problems with it being able to scale into this new product area.
We're actually going to be upgrading to version 12, so we're looking forward to it.
Scalibility is great.
View full review »SK
StaffSys83e6
Staff Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
No issues with scalability.
View full review »RM
reviewer897093
IT Process Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have had no issues.
View full review »We can leverage multiple servers with ease.
View full review »No issues.
View full review »We haven't had any issues. If we need more space, we just throw more space on the servers. If we need to have it connect to more databases or more services, there really is no issue with it.
View full review »We've had no trouble scaling it for our needs.
View full review »I would give scalability a 10 out of 10.
View full review »CG
CLGZ
Technology Operations Director at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not encounter any issues with scalability.
View full review »JV
reviewer1637511
Problem and Technical Application Management for KNAB at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have several customers at this moment and AutoSys is used by one bank. In fact, it's not like real end-users are touching the tool. It is doing its job during the night and it is only for one application including the bank application, so it's not connected to its final end users, so you scale all the toolings which are available in the bank environment. We only focus on the core banking.
It's been scalable. Architecture-wise, it's pretty robust, and we've been able to work it out with CA. We run over 10,000 jobs a day.
View full review »RG
reviewer1353396
Technology Consultant (AWS Certified) at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
AutoSys Workload Automation is very scalable. My clients were mainly large organizations and they never had any complaints about the scalability.
View full review »MF
Reviewer7208
System Architect at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
It's pretty scalable, and ready for enterprise.
View full review »HQ
reviewer958518
Architect & Technical Director at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable.
I have many customers running this solution.
View full review »SM
it_user534384
Technical Consultant at Atgen Software Solutions LLP
I have not encountered any issues with scalability.
View full review »They are enhancing the product for new limits, so we should be able to scale without a problem.
View full review »This is a scalable product and we have about 50 users. We are planning to increase our usage in the future.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
AutoSys Workload Automation
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about AutoSys Workload Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.