I have experience with Splunk, AppDynamics, BMC Proactive Document Management, Microsoft ACCM, New Relic, and Grafana. 

We've also used New Relic. We moved away due to the cost. 

We used FrameFlow. We switched to being native. It's a Microsoft native tool.

We used New Relic. While Azure Monitor covers resource aspects, New Relic excels in providing a thorough examination of application issues. New Relic can precisely identify problems related to resource allocation, pinpointing issues within the application, whether they originate from application resources or the database.

I previously worked with SolarWinds and ManageEngine, but both were developed for on-premise environments.

We are moving our applications to Azure Web Apps.

Earlier we used Dynatrace, however, it was quite costly.

Prior to using Azure Monitor I used SolarWinds. I think that SolarWinds is more infrastructure level oriented while Azure covers infrastructure but also covers the application side. That's why we migrated to Azure.

I have previously used Dynatrace and Datadog. Dynatrace is the most expensive solution but also the fastest to produce results. I would rate Datadog to fall between Azure Monitor and Dynatrace. Azure Monitor is the most cost-effective of the three solutions. 

This was only the traditional basic monitoring for Azure.

We previously used New Relic. Azure Monitor does a better job of integrating with Microsoft, which is one of its main selling points.

We used to use an on-premise solution, but I cannot remember the name of it. We switched over to Azure because it was better suited to our needs. 

We have used other monitoring tools and one of the advantages of Azure Monitor is that it is easier for us to use because we're mainly a Microsoft shop.

The solution is currently replacing SCOM, and SCOM is a very admin heavy product. Azure Monitor seems to require a lot of admin as well.

Neither are out-of-the-box solutions. Both require a lot of work.

Prior to Azure Monitor, we did not work with any similar solutions.