I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. There's always room for improvement as we discover new features and functionalities.

The solution is very stable. 

The solution is very stable. 

I would rate the stability of Azure Monitor an eight and a half out of ten. It's pretty stable.

During the early years of 2017 or 2018, the server faced significant challenges in terms of flexibility and stability. However, in recent years, notable improvements have been made, resulting in a much more stable environment.

The stability of Azure Monitor is good. It has not been a problem. The solution does not require maintenance. When we adopt new services, we need to configure things as part of a checklist of items. This is a minor step.

I would rate the stability a five out of five. 

The solution is very stable. It's robust. The performance is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. The reliability is high. 

I've not had any issues with it so far. I'd rate it a ten out of ten in terms of stability.

Azure Monitor is a very stable product, and I don't find any bugs in it.

We currently find it stable since our present requirements are relatively straightforward, and we are utilizing its basic functionalities.

I give the stability a ten out of ten.

Azure Monitor is a stable solution.

We never had issues with the solution's stability. I rate Azure Monitor a nine out of ten for stability.

Azure Monitor is definitely a stable product once we have deployed it to our target. Azure Monitor, when deployed to a VM, will give you a stable interface for taking readings on various aspects of a machine's performance, such as what's going on with the CPU, memory, and data communications.

When it comes to more advanced usage with deeper monitoring, Azure Monitor can integrate with AI to make the process of advising what to do about resolving certain problems much easier.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the solution's stability as a five for the European region and ten for other regions.

Azure Monitor is very stable - I'd rate its stability ten out of ten.

It is a stable solution. 

It's quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

It's pretty stable.

It's stable and constantly updated with new features and functionalities.

Azure Monitor is a stable tool.

The solution is quite stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We haven't had any performance issues. I'd rate the level of stability ten out of ten. 

Azure Monitor is a stable solution.

The solution is stable. 

It is a stable solution.

I rate the tool's stability a seven out of ten. 

This is a stable solution.

This is a stable solution. 

The product is stable.

We've barely used the solution for production. It's hard to grade the stability at this point. 

Azure Monitor is very stable. 

We have had no issues with respect to stability.

We've had no major issues, so the program is stable.

The solution is quite stable on the cloud. We haven't had issues. There have been no bugs, crashes or glitches. We've found it to be quite reliable so far.

The stability is okay. I just think it doesn't have the same agility as its competitors like ExtraHop, New Relic, or Dynatrace. 

It's nowhere near as good as those products.

The stability of the product is okay. We've got to do some further testing with alerting. It is something we are at the point of using now with our customers. A client was previously getting flooded with alerts but not when we were able to suppress alerts in the right way. So, I think it's pretty stable compared to how it was. There is still more room for improvement.

Azure Monitor is very stable.