Azure Site Recovery Room for Improvement

Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net

The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution to be able to act as a CDP replacement.

View full review »
Peter Maklin Aquino - PeerSpot reviewer
Project manager at Lapanday Foods Corporation

The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing. While the service is efficient and successful in handling recovery scenarios, especially for large companies dealing with substantial monthly data, the costs can be a significant consideration. The ease and speed of ASR in recovery are commendable, but addressing the pricing aspect would enhance overall satisfaction.

View full review »
Rajesh Patel Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

There is room for improvement in support because it can be very slow and unprofessional.

Another improvement can be there in terms of scalability. For example, it requires more time to sync with additional servers.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ElsayedAboelnaga - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at Target

I would like to see more security features. 

View full review »
Dani Bachour - PeerSpot reviewer
System Administrator at Hariss International

One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately. It would be great to have tools that provide clearer insights into how our costs might evolve over time. Like a budget forecast that considers potential fluctuations based on usage, helping avoid surprises.

View full review »
SM
Enterprise architect at Kapsch

I'd like to see more integration with other platforms.  

View full review »
Muhammad Saad Zahoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

It was easier to configure the server in the older version of Azure Site Recovery. Still, in the newest version, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement in the solution.

View full review »
RS
Team Lead , Enterprise Computing Platforms at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location.

View full review »
Deepak Kumar Software - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Vice President at Rishabh Software

Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability. 

View full review »
MOHAMEDTRABELSI - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior infrastructure engineer at Cubic Information Systems

The tool should improve synchronization. 

View full review »
AC
Works at Lab2021

I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call.

View full review »
MikeChacker - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager Global Service Delivery at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning.

I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.

View full review »
Sujit Suryavanshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Manager - IT at Logixal

Site Recovery could improve its communication of when new features are available.

View full review »
Fernando Cordero - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Officer at GikBrain

The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved. 

View full review »
RJ
Cloud Architect at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

The immutable backup could be better and should be improved.

View full review »
AF
Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.

View full review »
it_user1295826 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Improvement could be made on the pricing model. It could be brought in line with the competitive ranges in the market 

Additional features could include more of a backup and recovery. We'd like to see the AIX operating system added into it. It's more virtual right now.

View full review »
HV
Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

There have been issues with replication. 

It would be helpful if error logging was handled more effectively.

When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery as a Service
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.