Azure Site Recovery Room for Improvement
The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution to be able to act as a CDP replacement.
The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing. While the service is efficient and successful in handling recovery scenarios, especially for large companies dealing with substantial monthly data, the costs can be a significant consideration. The ease and speed of ASR in recovery are commendable, but addressing the pricing aspect would enhance overall satisfaction.
One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately. It would be great to have tools that provide clearer insights into how our costs might evolve over time. Like a budget forecast that considers potential fluctuations based on usage, helping avoid surprises.
Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery as a Service
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: February 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
It was easier to configure the server in the older version of Azure Site Recovery. Still, in the newest version, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement in the solution.
View full review »There is room for improvement in support because it can be very slow and unprofessional.
Another improvement can be there in terms of scalability. For example, it requires more time to sync with additional servers.
View full review »RS
reviewer1513167
Team Lead , Enterprise Computing Platforms at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location.
View full review »SM
SimonMartyn
Enterprise architect at Kapsch
I'd like to see more integration with other platforms.
View full review »AC
AndyChen3
Works at Lab2021
I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call.
View full review »Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability.
View full review »Site Recovery could improve its communication of when new features are available.
View full review »RJ
reviewer1508952
Cloud Architect at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
The immutable backup could be better and should be improved.
View full review »The tool should improve synchronization.
View full review »I would like to see more security features.
View full review »The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Disaster Recovery as a Service
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: February 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.