The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however.

Adding a license is somewhat difficult. We were using a free version first. Then, we purchased a license. Implementing the license is difficult. The paid version costs us about $20,000 for 100 users annually.

Bizagi is totally free for modeling.

We are using the paid version, not the free version.

The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose. 

I think that we took a license. I have used the full version, but most of the time, I have been using the free version.

In the company where I am working currently, we use the free and the paid version. Bizagi Studio is free, and for production, there is a paid version.

When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good.

We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil.

I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user. I don't really remember. 

Previously it was super easy to at least use a modular version. I'm not yet using the professional version.

I prefer to have a free solution to start with. 

It is not expensive.

I'm using the free version so there are no licensing costs. 

This is a free solution.

I was using the free version. The paid version was quite pricey. Bizagi was one part of a bigger solution. Three parts worked together as a whole system. Hence, the price was high. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

The value proposition of the product compared to its competitors is strong. The usage-based pricing model is a better value for larger organizations with many users. Smaller companies looking for a lower-cost perpetual license may be advised to explore other options.

The solution's cost is affordable.

We haven't dealt with the cost or licensing aspects because we're using the free option. The paid solution is quite expensive. We don't have enough money to take a license for the solution so we use the open source option. 

We're using the free version of the solution. We don't have to pay any licensing fees. We like dealing with open-source, as our company doesn't have too much of a budget. There aren't any additional costs for how we use it.

We aren't really paying anything for the solution currently. I acquired this tool when I was using it at school during my Master's class. It was given to us as a package from the school, so I brought it to work to use.

From what I know of the market, I think Bizagi is a cheap solution for process engineering. Out of the solutions I've tried, from cheapest to most expensive, would be Vizor, Bizagi, Signavio, and then Siemens. I used a version of Bizagi that my university provided for free, so I have never paid for a license.

The solution does have a free version, which we use. However, we also use the enterprise version as well, which is under different licensing.

They should look a little bit at their license set up. There should be something in between the free version and the enterprise version, which has everything. The enterprise is very expensive, not very, but it is expensive. In many cases, you need a few of the functionalities in the enterprise, but not the sole enterprise model. 

They could actually gain a lot more licensed users if they had some of the functionalities of the enterprise version in the free version and created a mid-range option that sat in between both. 

For example, in order to publish on HTML, you need to have the enterprise model or publish it in SharePoint, so that you can have the connection to SharePoint. That is something where having a mid-license would benefit both themselves as a company, and the clients who don't want a full-enterprise solution.

The product must improve its cost. I rate the pricing a six or seven out of ten.

The price could be lower. I would like to do more from an enterprise perspective, but I'm unable to do so at the moment.

The licensing fee is paid on a yearly basis.

The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge.

I'm trying the free unlimited version with unlimited use. But you have to pay to add some features.

We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it.

Make sure that your requirements are explicitly defined from the outset. This will help you choose the right setup and licensing for your needs. 

It is expensive.

It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi.

It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian. That gives a definite edge to the tool, specially in manufacturing and retail segments.

I think that its price is reasonable.

Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it.

We're currently using the free modeler. Our advise is that avoid the complicated ones unless there is an inbuilt BRE in there. Most of them seem to insist that we must know Java.

The initial cost was zero. For maintenance, approximately $3,000/year.

We have no issues with the pricing.

Bizagi had very convenient licensing prices, USD 550 per user. However, they recently changed their pricing to USD 800 per user, which seems like a very steep increase. If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so.

We use the free version, so yes, we are very satisfied with the price. If you want more complicated software, you're going to have to pay for it. 

I'm not involved with financials so I wouldn't know how to answer any questions about pricing or licensing.

Pricing is good value for money. Licensing is simple, you choose between three options depending on your needs.

I used the trial version and I'm searching for the pricing. We'd be happy to carry the product because it does what we need and are already developing for it.

All solutions are similar

For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out.

The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better.