BlazeMeter Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of BlazeMeter competitors and alternatives
Real User
Performance lead at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Sep 24 2017

What is most valuable?

As a tool, it's something that we can use in all aspects of performance testing, whether it's services, whether it's web, whether it's customized APIs, like Citrix. It's the tool for performance testing, and it's definitely the industry... more»

How has it helped my organization?

In terms of having one tool it is helpful in terms of training. It has really great reporting features, so not only is it a good tool to do testing with, but when it comes to helping you produce good results that you can present up, it's an... more»

What needs improvement?

I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering. We're looking to bring in maybe AppDynamics. I personally don't know the integrations but having good integration tools is going to help us in the... more»
Consultant
Non Functional Test Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Aug 21 2016

What is most valuable?

Wasted time in low-end work (scripting) is greatly reduced with NeoLoad. It enables my team to record and modify test scripts very quickly. This reduces the effort for testing and enables the team to do more high-value work like analysis of... more»

How has it helped my organization?

Performance testing is done by testing frameworks in which NeoLoad is the driver of load. The ability to extend the tool is crucial for organisations. Our test framework is composed out of NeoLoad as a centralised component surrounded by... more»

What needs improvement?

The weakest feature of most of the load test tools is result analysis. It is important we can customise graphs to visualise results in such a way that stakeholders can understand the outcome of testing. To be able to visualise results better,... more»
Micro Focus
Real User
Performance Test Lead at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Jun 13 2017

What do you think of LoadRunner?

Valuable Features The capabilities and flexibility of the Controller, the ability to monitor the systems under test, and the comprehensive results Analysis which saves a great deal of time. • Room for Improvement More guidance on the use of the Tru Client protocol which is used for Web interfaces. • Use of Solution 15 years • Deployment Issues LoadRunner generally deploys without issues. • Stability Issues Its a complex product and there are usually a few bugs in the point zero releases, it is generally pretty reliable. Sometimes the controller can crash, this is usually after opening and closing several scenarios without closing the controller. Closing the controller after a couple of scenarios opened will avoid the problem. • Scalability Issues Scalability...

Sign Up with Email