BlazeMeter Alternatives and Competitors

Get our free report covering Apache, Micro Focus, Micro Focus, and other competitors of BlazeMeter. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of BlazeMeter alternatives and competitors

RajaRao
Real User
Associate at a software R&D company with 10,001+ employees
Feb 17 2020

What is most valuable?

The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter. The custom meter is nice. It has a lot of features. When compared with BlazeMeter, I use the plain data. In the cloud after one year… more»

What needs improvement?

The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools. The stability in some of the latest versions has not been ideal. They need to work to fix it so that it becomes reliably stable again. The cloud solution of LoadRunner is… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution needs to reduce licensing costs. Its main competition, for example, is free to use, so I'm sure it's rather difficult to compete with it on a cost level.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I also use BlazeMeter. With LoadRunner, I use it with a paid tool, and since I am following the protocol, I need it to be easy to use. Whereas with BlazeMeter, we use it with JMeter. We need to use it sometimes if we want support. We need… more»

What other advice do I have?

We're partners with Micro Focus. I haven't found many products in this particular niche that have compared to JMeter and BlazeMeter tools. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I suggest other potential users review Micro Focus. If the… more»
UdayKumar
Real User
Senior Software Development Engineer Test at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Feb 10 2020

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting. JMeter allows us to automate performance testing and raise diagnostic functions.

What needs improvement?

This solution should support the Ruby programming language for scripting. JMeter should support dynamic throughput so that we can reduce or increase it during the execution of the scripts. For performance testing, we would like to be able… more»

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have also started working with BlazeMeter. One of the differences is that the automation is not possible in BlazeMeter. However, BlazeMeters allows for the selection of different bandwidths, it takes less time to write tests, and it is… more»

What other advice do I have?

JMeter is a good solution but it requires writing manual scripts and takes longer than BlazeMeter. It takes longer to cover the same number of use cases and is not as user-friendly. I would rate this solution a four out of ten.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are currently comparing the differences between Apache JMeter and BlazeMeter.
Get our free report covering Apache, Micro Focus, Micro Focus, and other competitors of BlazeMeter. Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.