The stability depends on the processes and needs. If we deal with a lot of data, then the solution is not stable. The UI automation mode is also not that stable.

Stability is rated a five out of ten. 

Occasionally, there may be stability issues where certain nodes begin to behave erratically and produce errors. 

However, this is typically resolved by restarting the nodes. While I am not personally involved in monitoring and addressing such issues, we have had this problem before and have even developed monitoring tools to detect these issues early and automatically restart nodes when necessary.

I would not say that this issue happens very often, I would rate the stability a seven or eight out of ten.

If the servers are stable then it's an issue with the nodes, which has a workaround.

The solution is stable, and we have no concerns so far. 

Blue Prism is a very stable solution.

The solution is quite stable except for a few security aspects. Our partners are highly skilled and ensure that everything meets client standards.

We do follow good practice to create reusable components and at the same time, while being a part of COE. For a complex project, we target three months to complete any of the complex projects. So even in terms of scalability from the critical.

I rate Blue Prism nine out of 10 for stability. 

In terms of the stability of the solution, I think that Blue Prism is a really good tool. It's a stable solution.

I give the stability a nine out of ten.

Blue Prism is a stable product. But it's not very flexible when it comes to integrations. Blue Prism's forum is smaller, unlike some other RPA tools, where there is a large forum with a wide range of integrations readily available in the marketplace. If you want to integrate any solution from the Digital Exchange, you may not find as many options as compared to other tools. So, while Blue Prism is stable and secure, it may not be as flexible as other RPA tools.

The solution is generally stable although we have had some inconsistencies. 

We have been working with the bots for the last two years, and they're working as expected as of now. 

Blue Prism is a stable solution.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. We haven't had any major issues with the product.

We have had a mixed experience of the stability of the solution. The problem that we have faced might be our infrastructure. The application itself can't be completely blamed. I think some of the issues are down to our VM infrastructure, the application service that we use, and the host that the servers are hosted on. In terms of the application, we have not seen many issues.

The solution is actually based on the previous technologies which are very stable from Microsoft. This is the SQL server and the WPF. I don't see problems with the stability of the solution. It's really pretty good.

The product stability allows me to work on value-adding work rather than doing maintenance.

The solution is quite stable. We haven't had any issues with it. It isn't buggy or glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It's stable. We haven't faced any problems with it.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. Because a lot of times, there are specific versions of things that you have to use. So browsers, plugins, all that good stuff. 

For example, some of our clients had their clients on auto-update. And what happened was it was updated during the auto-update, and then the bots would fail because there were plugins or features that were specific to versions of Chrome that we included in the solution. But on the upgrade, they would then fail. On some of the older versions, some of the challenges were around the actual configuring of the virtual machines and their allocation of memory.

In essence, you had the physical memory on the machines, but virtual machines weren't configured properly, so they would run out of memory.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

It is a stable solution. Sometimes service failure occurs. But it fails due to the infrastructure rather than the tool.

The stability is good, but it is not perfect. I rate it an eight out of ten.

It is stable. There are no issues.

The product is quite stable.

The solution is stable and reliable. it's problem-free. there aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

From a platform perspective, we see compatibility issues with Oracle's JD Edwards software sometimes, but overall, to my knowledge, the solution is stable.

Once it is set up and gets the steamroll, it seems pretty good to stay. It is self-sufficient in many ways with the processes. Change control and password are a bit of a struggle sometimes, but that's general with automation and trying to be fast-moving. Overall, it is pretty stable and self-sustaining.

There are some issues with its stability. On a scale of five, I would give it a four.

Blue Prism is working fine and the stability is fantastic.

The stability has been good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it performs well.

The stability could be better. The scheduler functionality doesn't always work as expected and there is content downtime as well. It's okay, however, they could work on improving it. 

It's a stable solution. It has a quite simple architecture and is very connected to the machine on which Blue Prism works. The RPA tools are connected with the machine, with the applications, with the credentials, and that improves stability.

We used to have some issues with the older version of Blue Prism, which required technical support, but this has been addressed in the newer versions. Overall, after the upgrade, I'd say it's very stable.

We have had the odd case of the robot falling for no reason. Then you restart the whole thing and you find it runs okay. To me, that's a very big problem with stability.

I would rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

We've found the stability to be very good. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

It is stable and it doesn't break down easily. 

If it is deployed in the right server and based on the requirements, and the comments they have documented on the site, it's pretty stable.

The stability of Blue Prism is good.

The stability is really good.

It is a stable product. On the stability front, we haven't found any issues.

The stability can be improved by building something on top of it, code-wise. When you are running the software, it needs to attach to whatever window you are on, and then you need to build it separately. This is where you get stability.

Stability-wise, it is a good tool. 

It is stable.

I rate the solution's stability as an eight.

It is stable.

Blue Prism is stable enough. 

Its stability is pretty good. That's the reason why they have 98% of renewals.

We have had some problems in the Blue Prism environment. For the tasks our robots are doing, our success rate is between ninety-two and ninety-eight percent. So, there are some things that are not being successfully created.

Stability-wise, it is a good solution.

We did not find any issues with respect to stability or performance. We performed testing around the number of emails that were coming in and tried to see how fast the bot was able to process them. We also tried scheduling the bot to run at a specific time and checked to see if it was able to do so.

We did not perform extensive load testing efforts.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's extremely reliable in terms of performance. 

It has been pretty stable. Most errors are human errors in the input files. When we have issues, they are usually because of the content of the input file. There are no technical issues with the product.

We don't have problems with stability. It is one's own IT infrastructure that lets you down, whether it is networking or otherwise. The system itself hasn't been a problem.

Blue Prism is a stable solution.

Blue Prism is quite stable.

The stability is quite good.

It is pretty stable as compared to other RPA solutions. Its stability also depends on other applications.

There are no issues in terms of stability. It is as stable as any other tool.

The solution was stable.

The stability is fantastic and is one of the great points of this solution.

The stability of this solution is very good.

Stability-wise, I haven't heard any complaints from our clients. 

It's a stable and reliable solution, we haven't had any issues with instability. 

It is stable, but we faced some issues while we were automating web applications.

The stability could improve.

It's a stable product. We have a very small team of three users who are support administrators.

We did not push the boundaries of our implementation beyond what you would normally expect for this type of solution.