Within my security product arsenal, I utilize various solutions like Genmap, QRadar, Alien, and others. The solution architecture is designed to accommodate different roles such as individual specialists and engineers. When logging on, one can access around fifteen to twenty different security components. These components cover a wide range of security areas, including ContainerVM security, on-premises security, email security, domain security, internal security, external security, conference-related security, as well as enterprise business and privacy tools.

Our primary suggestion is to leverage the out-of-the-box features when utilizing cloud solutions. If your company is using G Suite, for example, we recommend assessing the current situation and then applying the available out-of-the-box features within the G Suite Security Center. Additionally, we suggest considering the inclusion of quarantine, SPS, and other relevant measures. When dealing with phishing campaigns, we typically employ manual templates and methods tailored to each specific case. However, concerning email-related security solutions, we rely on G Suite's Netium Security.

My colleagues have worked with Microsoft in the past.

In 2020, I stopped using PegaRULES as I moved into a different project and started using Blue Prism completely. Regarding why I switched to Blue Prism Cloud, it's a new technology, and it's a requirement of my company, mainly because most people work from home nowadays because of the pandemic. My company needed to remove unnecessary workloads and repeated tasks, so it required an automation technology, and in this case, it's Blue Prism Cloud.

I have used UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere.

We have used UiPath before.

We are using both Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism for automating our processes. The ability to write custom code in Blue Prism makes it more helpful than Automation Anywhere.

We didn't previously use a different solution. This is the first product we've implemented.

We are also dealing with UiPath, WorkFusino, and Automation Anywhere.

Microsoft Power Automate, which comes standard with your Microsoft tools, I believe is gaining traction in the market. I haven't seen any large-scale deployments yet, but that's something to keep an eye out for.

We previously used a different solution that was a desktop-based automation tool. Blue Prism is a server-based product that is a more mature and stable product compared to what we were using earlier. The differences between the two products are not related to whether it's on cloud or not, this is just a better solution. 

In 2017, after SAP acquired Contextor, my company decided to move to Blue Prism Cloud.

Compared to SAP, which provides users with a cloud, with Blue Prism Cloud, you have everything on an on-premise model.

With Contextor, you have the option for development, meaning you could still code, but with Blue Prism Cloud, you can't carry out the same tasks as in Contextor since it doesn't provide you with a drag-and-drop option.

We use multiple RPA products including UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, WinAutomation, and WorkFusion. The choice of product depends on the customer and their requirements. 

We didn't previously use a different solution.

That said, we're actually starting to move over to UiPath. Our team is starting to work with it now.

I do find that Blue Prism's LCR Function ID is better, however, UiPath is cheaper.

We also have experience with UiPath. In comparison to UiPath, Blue Prism is more resilient and reusable, however, UiPath is faster when it comes to building a process.

We do tend to use different solutions. We don't use the same solution for every client or even the same kind of implementation.

We also tried some internal use cases using Robocorp.

We also use UiPath. We use the two solutions together, although the organization is moving towards UiPath and away form Blue Prism, as UiPath is more user friendly and easier to handle on may levels.

I also use the free UiPath platform. It's a very strong go-to-market proposition. You can't have that with Blue Prism. UiPath is also user-friendly. I found UiPath much easier to use and more straightforward than Blue Prism. 

I haven't seen any technical differences between both products. Everything I could do with Blue Prism, I can do with UiPath.

Blue Prism is able to scale up at an enterprise-level. It's what I used when I was working for a big bank in Belgium. UiPath is better for smaller companies and SMBs because of its user-friendliness.

If a product is offered for free, just to step in, instead of directly paying heavy investments, I think a lot of enterprises, especially in the SME, SMB business, will have much more interest in such kind of products.

Ultimately, we chose not to implement this solution for production.