BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer Previous Solutions
MF
MarkFrancome
Senior System Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 201-500 employees
It was the very first solution we worked with. We tried a few other options when I first looked at the market 20 years ago. We investigated Tivoli Workload Manager, or TWM, as an IBM product that we didn't think IBM was developing much at the time, but that turned out to be the case.
There is another product called title software that is a good competitor that we considered, but it wasn't as reliable as Control-M and all of the CA. Broadcom now owns everything.
They have a wide range of solutions in their portfolio, but I've never used any of them. CA-7, which is not a very old mainframe-based solution, could be compared to Control-M if you only had a mainframe, but it is incompatible with Unix and Windows. I have always worked with BMC Control-M and seen other schedulers, but it's always been BMC Control-M. I am trusting the software.
View full review »MF
MarkFrancome
Senior System Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 201-500 employees
We used Cron and Windows Task Scheduler, i.e. the platform supplied solution. They are not the same as using a centralized scheduler but they don't pretend to be.
View full review »We use a lot of different solutions, including Genesys, NICE, Control-M ESPL, WFM, and workforce management. All are interoperable.
The company has used this solution for about seven years, and I have only been around for one. I'm not sure why they first initiated usage.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DT
David Temperley
Consultant at Temperley Research Ltd
I've worked with different clients and used different solutions.
View full review »AR
Alan Rivera
Director Comercial at tdi
I chose BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer over the other solution because I know more about it, and it works better in terms of function.
View full review »AR
ANIRUDH RAMESH
Manager Application Services at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I worked for about six months with two similar tools, one of which was called JAMS. JAMS was more related to Windows, whereas with Control-M, it doesn't really matter which operating system or which environment you're trying to connect to. So with any distributed system, it's a very easy setup—with others, I have felt that it was a task, since it took some time to do.
View full review »I used a different solution called Computer Associates. I switched because my client switched to that solution. I never went against the solution or suggested to switch over again, because I like BMC.
View full review »KN
reviewer1289280
Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Prior to using this solution, we were using Axway B2Bi. We are still currently using it, alongside with the BMC MFT product.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.