BMC TrueSight Operations Management Room for Improvement

John_Rooney
Vice President of Managed Services at Park Place Technologies
Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight. In its purest form, TrueSight is an enterprise product, meaning one company would run it in its internal data centers and internal IT organization. But our company is more of a managed-service provider. We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need. View full review »
Doug Greene
Sr. Director Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter. They've been highly focused on cloud initiative. I don't know anyone in the industry who has solved how to monitor cloud, SaaS-based systems, because all of those systems are usually linked through other systems. That would be another area where it would be nice to see if they could find innovative ways to be able to do that. The third piece would be around out-of-the-box automation. We all have particular types of alerts and events where all we really need to do is be able to turn the functionality on versus creating the functionality. BMC is already addressing that in many cases. View full review »
ITManager610z9
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I can only speak from my perspective because I don't know if some of the issues that we've had are industry-wide or not. For instance, we've got a lot of Microsoft stuff here, and the SCOM interface is very difficult to use. They don't have support for SCCM and some other things so you have to go directly. The one piece that I would love to see is a general-purpose, configurable agent which would be a framework that you can deploy on anything, whether it be Java or anything else. It would allow you to easily deploy it on a platform that they support. The KMs and some of the user interface are a little bit quirky. That's the stuff that they will eventually get to. TrueSight is a fairly new platform revision for BMC. I'm seeing a lot of those simple platform things, where you have to go here and do this and you have to go there to do that. They're very working very hard to integrate everything into the same simple console. I think that a lot of the issues that we have are going to slowly, or maybe rapidly, disappeared. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), Moogsoft and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: October 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Monitori66fb
Monitoring Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It's a complex system. The implementation is fairly challenging. They have done a good job lately of getting videos out there. We would like more videos and self-training, though. Right now, you have to go to BMC's training classes to get a good understanding of the product, and those training classes are very expensive. While I understand they are a business and trying to make money, a lot of their competition has training available via YouTube. There is much more accessibility to competitors' training. In a large company of our size, we need multiple people in our company trained. So, I have to take the training classes. Then, I have to go and train the rest of my organization. I would prefer to say to the other people on my team, "Go to this link and..." Or, "Here's a list of training sessions that you can go to which are online and that are free." I think it would help the adoption of their product in the marketplace, personally. It's a far more complex technology than I perceived at the beginning to deploy. I would have thought that the integration between their products would have been more seamless than it has been. This is what has made it a lot more complex than I anticipated. From a technical standpoint, some of their products still have a dependency on Oracle Databases, and they are very well integrated in the cloud for a lot of their components. There is another database technology called Postgres, which they are partially integrated with. However, if they were to get all of their platforms integrated into Postgres, it would be much less expensive for companies, such as mine, to go to high availability, etc. The architecture really needs to be upgraded. I know they're doing a lot of this, but they need to keep doing it, and accelerate their process, so they can remain competitive. View full review »
SrManagef31c
Sr Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Continue to improve the maturity of the product overall. I definitely would like to see more improvement in the self-diagnostics. I need to know when anything is not working or collecting, long before our customer finds it. I would like to see continued improved integration with some of their partners. We use a lot of Intuity software. While the connections are good, they could be better. We use App Visibility, as part of the TrueSight suite. Previously, we were a big BMC TMRT customer previously. They gave up a lot of features of TMRT to get App Visibility in. Features that our customers used. They still complain about this weekly: When are we going to get this report or view back. When we took this issue back to BMC, they said, "It wasn't an upgrade from TMRT. It's a brand new product. It just happens to be serving the same market." From my user standpoint, we went from BMC TMRT to BMC App Visibility, giving up all these features. For us, it was an upgrade that we lost features on. I need that stuff back, at the end of the day, as a service provider. The customers need to feel comfortable that the data is there. They need to have accurate SLA type reports. The SLA reports that we get on TrueSight today are unfortunately worthless. They go to the whole integer. So, they all show 100 percent, when we've got contracts which are 99.996 percent and are now rounding to 100. Well, if we were at .9995, that's an SLA miss. Things like this are a problem. We have to do all this manually on the side. We can't roll this back, as the versions that we used to use are long out of support. The biggest issue is probably the gaps in the reporting that I need for my end customers. That is a very public and embarrassing, I can't give you the report that you need. Also, the reliability of the ISNs needs improving. Having a customer find a machine that stopped collecting before we do, that is not what you want when you're a service provider. View full review »
SrApplic76cd
Sr Application Engineer BMC at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy. In addition, it needs some details such as auditing inside the product - there is no auditing for the policies. View full review »
George Klarmann
CEO at Transcendence IT
I would like to see a little more out-of-the-box event correlation and expanded AIOps type capabilities. Where you can train your artificial intelligence operations to be able to memorize an issue once you encounter one scenario, so if you encounter that same problem, you can get to the root cause very quickly. View full review »
Sravanti Bhandaram
It Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
There are no broader areas of improvement. It would vary, environment by environment. As such, there are no outstanding bugs or defects that are not documented. View full review »
Alexander McKee
Enterprise Monitoring Automation Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
More modules for less popular applications and better documentation. Documentation can be great at times, but lacking in other areas. View full review »
reviewer802980
Senior Software Engineer with 201-500 employees
* BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization. * BMC's online documentation is often incorrect or incomplete. View full review »
LeadEngi939e
Lead Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles. Pricing is very high. View full review »
Benjamin McKrill
Enterprise Monitoring Automation Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies. View full review »
Stuart Reid
Senior Performance Analyst and BMC ProactiveNet administrator at a government with 10,001+ employees
The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), Moogsoft and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: October 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email