I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 200 users for the product. 

We have around 700 people using the solution in our organization.

The solution is scalable.

Scaling the environment during setup at larger organizations with 10,000 employees gets complicated.

I don't think they've listed their scalability appropriately for the configuration of the servers they support. It could probably scale better if you were using more robust systems than they tell you to set up. If you buy their minimum, you'll only get support for 300 or 400 servers, although they say it can support 1,500. Scalability could definitely be improved. We're looking at moving to Ansible for patches for Linux and Windows systems. We have five people out of a team of 10 who spend around three-quarters of the month doing Windows patching. 

Scalability is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. We deployed it for a BFSI customer with 25,000 to 30,000 servers. 

TrueSight Server Automation is specifically designed for enterprise-level usage. Because an enterprise envisions providing an end-to-end solution for automation and reducing human dependency. 

It's very scalable. In fact, they've actually introduced all kinds of optimizations. We originally started our environment out with eight application servers, and we had a job server on each one, so we had eight job servers, four authentication servers. We had a lot of processing power. But over time it's actually gotten more efficient and works better. Now we're actually down to four. We've been able to scale back our infrastructure while still maintaining the same level of job processing. We used to have 50 job threads per job server. Now we can go up to 100. Using those efficiencies and benefits that they've added, we've been able to reduce our infrastructure. We've been very pleased with that.

It's not something that we've come across yet. At the moment, the solution is integrated into probably 70 to 80 percent of the estate. We haven't had a need to scale up, although we probably will have a need in the future. For instance, we're just introducing the solution to services in private cloud. It will be interesting to see how that works. Apart from that, we haven't had a need to scale up. Though, there are plans to scale up going forward.

There is a different supplier to the supplier who I work running the tool day-to-day. It's for configuration management, compliance, and vulnerability management. The ability to patch and remediate through automation.

Not really.

We have tested it on a small scale of fifty to one hundred servers. We have almost twenty-five hundred servers, so we will deploy on a larger scale perhaps six months down the road.

I rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten.

We have had no issues with scalability.

Scalability for this solution is very important.