Broadcom Service Virtualization Reviews
Filter by:
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
Search:
Real User
Test Manager - DevOps at a maritime company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Apr 15 2019
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET. This is important because whenever the tool is limited you can extend it by writing your own… more»How has it helped my organization?
It hasn't matured enough yet to provide good prospects; we are still in the process of implementation. I can't tell you if anything in the process has improved or not, but the objective is to use this… more»What needs improvement?
CA Service Virtualization has its pros and cons. It's a strong framework and the feedback is good, however when it comes to acting as a test tool some improvements are required. UI should be more user… more»Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
When we started API and vacant testing, we needed a tool to support it. We did some research in the market and this solution has most of our requirements: it's stable, feature rich, and has many years… more»What other advice do I have?
I would give CA an eight out of ten. It could be a ten on service virtualization, but it's definitely a 6 or 7 in the application testing area. These two are combined into one product (CA DevTest), so… more»Which other solutions did I evaluate?
There were four vendors on the short list: * CA Service Virtualization * SOAtest by Parasoft * Green Hat (now Rational Integration Tester) by IBM. * ReadiAPI by SmartBear We chose CA as it fulfilled… more»
Françoise Dough
Real User
Senior Software Architecht at a software R&D company with 51-200 employees
Sep 17 2019
What is most valuable?
The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature. It was critical for us to prevent possible elements from "unnecessarily" breaking the pipeline. If I'm pushing a particular web service through the… more»How has it helped my organization?
In short, we are able to save a lot of valuable time. Testers and developers no longer complain about not having access to dependent services. We don't have to share/reserve resources or worry about our development being blocked by unavailable services.What needs improvement?
The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift. There are too many fragmented web components that could easily and logically be merged. For example, Service Catalog, Enterprise Dashboard, Portal, and Identity and Access Manager are all separate web applications… more»Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used HPE SV before. It was very user-friendly but cannot be compared with CA DevTest, as it lacks a lot of the important features.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Parasoft, Micro Focus and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Real User
Test Manager - DevOps at a maritime company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dec 13 2018
What do you think of Broadcom Service Virtualization?
What needs improvement?
On the testing side of the functionality, there are a few things that are missing. For instance, a comparative report. But since it's open source, we can add the extension and we do this by ourselves.For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is quite stable.How is customer service and technical support?
I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. They need more knowledge about the connectivity to DevOps orchestration.What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable.Articles
User Assessments By Topic About Broadcom Service Virtualization
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Parasoft, Micro Focus and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Broadcom Service Virtualization Questions
What is Broadcom Service Virtualization?
CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.
Also known as
ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization Broadcom Service Virtualization customers
Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil,
Popular Comparisons
SmartBear ServiceV Pro
Micro Focus Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
Tricentis Tosca
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server
Orchestrated Service Virtualization
SmartBear TestComplete
Micro Focus UFT One
Ranorex Studio
BUYER'S GUIDE
Download our free Service Virtualization Report and find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Parasoft, Micro Focus, and more!