BrowserStack Competitors and Alternatives

The top BrowserStack competitors are

CrossBrowserTesting

Read reviews of BrowserStack competitors and alternatives

Sauce Labs

Alexander Cassar

Intern - Technology Development Program at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 11 2016

What is most valuable?

It's ability to test on multiple browsers and OS combinations is invaluable as a QA tool. However, it's CI integration with Jenkins is why we were able to make a case to include this product in our ATDD process.

How has it helped my organization?

This has helped greatly as our organization switches from a waterfall method to an Agile method of software development. The transition is difficult and hectic at times, as it requires a big change in the way we think about, and treat the... more»

What needs improvement?

Rarely, some tests fail, seemingly without cause, and will succeed again the next time we run the tests. This isn't a behavior we saw when testing locally.

See full review (402 words) »

UFT (QTP)

Micro Focus

Veeraswamy Palla

AST at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 29 2018

What do you think of UFT (QTP)?

Primary Use Case To build an enterprise framework for functional automation with CI/CD features, automate all the standalone applications, and test applications in the cloud. • Improvements to My Organization We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution. • Valuable Features Supporting Windows applications and many other applications, like PeopleSoft and PowerBuilder applications. • Room for Improvement Integrating with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation). I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications. • Use of Solution More than five years.

See full review (112 words) »

CrossBrowserTesting

SmartBear Software

Patrick Rittenhouse

Senior Front-End Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

May 27 2018

What is most valuable?

The features that I find most useful and the ones that I use the most are local site testing, device and browser testing, and screenshots.

How has it helped my organization?

CBT has made it easier to troubleshoot issues across devices when we do not have actual access to those specific devices. I even opt for CBT sometimes when we do have access to the device just because it is easier.

What needs improvement?

I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same. For example, I have had to figure out how to get to Safari or whatever program I needed. If these issues were resolved,... more»

See full review (186 words) »