CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL} Alternatives and Competitors

Competitor
# Comparisons
Rating
Get our free report covering , and other competitors of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL}. Updated: August 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL} alternatives and competitors

FG
Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Allows IT personnel to create workflows across applications, platforms, and tools

What is our primary use case?

We have some very big data centers. We use BMC TrueSight Orchestration to operate automation for our data center solutions. For example, we use it with Server Automation — we integrated those products. We perform solo pitching and monitor compliance checks. We plan to increase our usage of this solution. We hope to have more than 10,000 agents in the near future. Within six month's time, we plan to increase the solution with a larger environment.

Pros and Cons

  • "I find the provisioning to be the most valuable."
  • "BMC TrueSight Orchestration is difficult to understand. It's not very user-friendly."

What other advice do I have?

You need to understand your environment and what you wish to automate. Make sure to perform a good analysis of the processes you wish to automate and the overall architecture of the solution. Without good planning, there will be trouble. For server automation, you can run a Python script if Python is installed in the OS — I prefer to use Python 6.6 inside this solution. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give BMC TrueSight Orchestration a rating of eight.
Get our free report covering , and other competitors of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL}. Updated: August 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.