Choose a specific buying criteria from the list and see what real users have to say about it.

CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation Scalability Issues

358705c4 a2ec 4427 81a2 811f263fb7aa avatar
Lead Software Programmer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Interestingly, since we're a beta site, we had the old automation platform. Then, when they merged OPS/MVS to automate, they really improved things with the merge. And then they started building up on it, so it's been scalable for the past umpteen years now. view full review »
Ab02a170 49e2 47ab be3c 9e3e5ef2ff55 avatar
Senior System Programmer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
As mentioned, our largest LPAR currently has 633 tasks defined to SSM. That kind of shows that there does not seem to be any issues with how big a system can get. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Production Control at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Adding OPS to a new LPAR or removing it from a decommissioned LPAR, hasn’t caused any issues. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Mainframe Automation Support at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're a large shop with many requirements and scalability has never been an issue. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Senior Automation Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I did not really encounter any issues with scalability. We were warned of an issue with the number of MSF links that could be up simultaneously, but that was resolved years ago. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Snr Vice president CIO at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It has adapted well to the mainframe, but we haven’t ported it to any other platform though. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Our company size is around 10-15 thousand. Our ops team is a few hundred people, and it's served us well. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Programmer 3 at Shelter insurance
The scalability is working very well for us so far. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Senior Systems Administrator 2 at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is extremely scalable. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
IT System Software - Technical Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is good. I'd say it's up there in the upper range, 9/10 or 10/10 for scalability. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Systems Analyst / Programmer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
So far, we haven't run into scalability issues. We can use the solution when scaling up or down. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Vice President, Managing Director Defined Contribution at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have gotten close in one or two cases with the size of global variables but no show-stoppers. view full review »
3da98aec 8e6b 4fe1 a25f d9bef52e1160 avatar?1453386904
Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is really good because for the few systems that we have, it easily manages the message workload that we put out and can really handle much, much more. I know of much larger sites that are using OPS/MVS for their automation and these other companies wouldn't be using it if it wasn't scalable the way that it is. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Mainframe System Sofware Support at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have not encountered any scalability issues; very scalable. view full review »

Sign Up with Email