Nolio Release Automation Pricing

Akhilesh B N - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools.

The pricing could be cheaper. In our organization, we've been using it for many years. Due to pricing considerations, there were discussions about transitioning to an alternative tool to replace Nolio. 

View full review »
it_user587598 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Sme, Release Manager (Grm) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

This solution is pricey compared to its peers.

View full review »
it_user577341 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer Web Logic Portal Operations/Tech Services at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Licensing concerns play an important role in how you standardize your deployment process. Where possible, take advantage of clustering capabilities that allow you to deploy to a single host and push the deployments out to all the members of the cluster.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Digital.ai and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RK
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The price is not an issue here.

View full review »
it_user566886 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - IT at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

The price of this product is expensive.

View full review »
RV
CA Lisa Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I'm not sure of the licensing costs for this solution. These are not details I handle in my day to day. They are directly handled by the client.

View full review »
MC
SQA Manager at a tech services company

It is an expensive tool and the licensing model is difficult to sell.

View full review »
it_user541449 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

CA's reps have been extremely helpful in my experience. They take the time to understand what you are trying to do and then propose solutions and pricing with room for scaling based on resources and budget constraints. This product is licensed based on the number of agents (servers) in the environment so that is a consideration each time we on board a new product into the Release Automation application.

View full review »
it_user581823 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Analyst at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

There are cheaper, or even free tools, but I guarantee that getting this solution is worth the price.

View full review »
it_user210456 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, DevOps with 51-200 employees

Confidential but not much compared to the large perimeter we had to automate.

View full review »
MC
SQA Manager at a tech services company

It is an expensive tool and the licensing model is difficult to sell.

View full review »
it_user205848 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, DevOps at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees

I don't know the original setup cost. They charge several thousand per agent/node.

View full review »
it_user208614 - PeerSpot reviewer
Arquitecto de soluciones CA LISA RELEASE Automation at a financial services firm

Initial setup cost is more expensive, but the day-to-day cost is only for maintenance, design and for people development.

View full review »
it_user6813 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It was expensive. In the latest version they have a lot of plug-ins so it would be worth it to invest in that version rather than what we used.

View full review »
LG
DevOps Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

It has its cost and can be considered to be more expensive compared to other solutions.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Digital.ai and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.