Nolio Release Automation Scalability
We have a substantial number of users, roughly around 13,000 to 15,000 end users. So, we're operating on an enterprise scale.
So, scaling is easy. Once you get familiar with the tool and get some basic information about it, it becomes easy to scale.
View full review »It’s not scalable; we can never deploy this in an HA environment. We think they have to reprogram the core of the system, but it depends on which environment you’re using the solution in. If you’re using the solution in a less intensive, small business it could be more usable.
View full review »Extremely scalable, that's one of the main reasons why we bought it. It's extremely scalable. We've been able to scale up from probably 100 or so automations to where we're doing 700 now, per release. It's been a very powerful tool. Broad set of technologies as well.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Digital.ai and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Scalability is a good question. We started with one application automation. Now, we automate around 400 applications. We installed close to 2,000 agents.
View full review »Scalability was never an issue with this product. However, my experience with the product is limited to having up to 1000 target deployment servers registered on the tool. No redesign is expected as we continue to add servers after the initial PoC of a dozen servers.
View full review »We discovered that administrators can build application deployment processes in certain ways that will cause deployment agents to get hung if you attempt concurrent deployments to the same physical hosts. This has more to do with the learning curve on how to build the processes than the product itself.
View full review »We scaled it across our enterprise; we are using it across our entire enterprise.
We started using it for a couple of apps, i.e., somewhere between 40-45 applications; so it is quite good.
View full review »Scalability also got better over time. It was not scalable when we started with it. The product was designed primarily for small and medium scale organizations. I'm now seeing the product scaling up to large scale organizations. I'm sure they will improve this further down the road.
View full review »RK
Ronit Knafo
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We have more than 500 uses in my company. Nolio requires 20 people for maintenance.
View full review »DP
reviewer887301
Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We have had no scalability issues.
View full review »RV
Rahul Verma
CA Lisa Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any trouble when expanding the solution.
Right now, we have 15 users on it. Most are engineers or admins. They're handling the day to day department tasks.
View full review »MC
reviewer211584
SQA Manager at a tech services company
We have not encountered any scalability issues. It is very important to perform a correct design of the architecture beforehand.
View full review »It's pretty scalable, because you could just have multiple execution servers run. If you wanted to have more servers and agents deployed out than you currently have execution servers, you can add those on at any given time.
View full review »What we're looking at is a very small part. From some of the information at a recent CA conference, I can see where we can expand. We can expand into our test organization. We can expand into our further release organization. I think there's a lot of scalability.
View full review »We have experienced no scalability issues. The agents are always up and running, so no complaints.
View full review »Unlike a lot of the different CA Release Automation products, we actually are very unique in what we're doing. We're actually having to take the software and put into steps that allows us to stop the software automatically, send it out for approvals, get all the approvals signed and back to us, then continue the automation process.
The scalability allowed us to be able to do that. It also allowed us to be able to run multiple processes at the same time. Again, being able to look at our product and being able to target specific set-top boxes or groups of boxes.
View full review »The product seems to be incredibly stable. We currently fluctuate between 50 and 100 agents in our environment with no issue. I understand that there are companies utilizing 1000 - to 1500 agents. The architecture is easily scaled to accommodate high quantities of agents spanning multiple physical locations.
View full review »We have not faced any issues which scalability till now, but we do not have implementations which are very large.
View full review »It is possible to have a lot of execution servers, but you can’t put them in a balanced pool of servers. In the majority of cases, agents will be used to reach one specific machine.
When executing a remote command, such as JDBC, it is ineffective to use only one specific server. This will be a single point of failure.
View full review »Never, if the action type doesn’t exist you can create it by yourself.
View full review »MC
reviewer211584
SQA Manager at a tech services company
There have been no scalability issues. It is very important to do a correct design of the architecture ahead of time.
View full review »As far as I know, the new products are scalable. I think that all of their products are scalable. CA takes care of scalability. They build their products so they can be scaled up.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »Yes. The licensing model before the company was purchased was scalability-friendly. Now it is not.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »There were no scalability issues. It was designed with scalability in mind. It's easy to manage a big number of agents by adding a new execution server to the architecture.
View full review »NV
Nikhil Vyas
Software Build & Release Architect/ DevOps at HMS
It can be scaled up to more than 2,000 action items. We are using about 400 actions as of now. However, due to the complex flow we use for internal company needs, we are actually doing more than a thousand.
View full review »None so far.
View full review »It is definitely scalable and it is as big as we need it to be. Because of the actions that we create, we can use them throughout all the applications with the minor changes.
View full review »We are not able to scale it beyond what was initially defined on the infra-bases, so I can't fully answer.
View full review »We have some issues but we're not really sure of the reason why.
View full review »There have been no scalability issues.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »No issues unless your are using it in a distributed environment.
View full review »It did not scale efficiently to multiple domains for NES. Upgrades are expensive in terms of effort.
View full review »Scalability, we have added in more and more. We don't have the largest implementation by any means but we've got a very complex system and we add more to it on a regular basis as our application grows.
View full review »LG
Lidor Gerstel
DevOps Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
We did encounter some scalability issues. Only active/passive mode is available for this product and not high availability mode like other products.
View full review »Scalability is the one aspect we are completely sold on this particular product. All our various teams, at various stages, are going to start using Release Automation and we want to be able to manage all that scale. Also, we are geographically a very diversified company. We want certain hardware in certain areas and less hardware in the other areas. We can do that with the Release Automation.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Digital.ai and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.