CA Workload Automation iDash Overview

CA Workload Automation iDash is the #12 ranked solution in our list of top Workload Automation tools. It is most often compared to AutoSys Workload Automation: CA Workload Automation iDash vs AutoSys Workload Automation

What is CA Workload Automation iDash?

CA Workload Automation iDash (iDash) ensures that you consistently deliver on service level guarantees by applying advanced workload analytics to create finely tuned workload automation environments. iDash performs real-time forecasts based on the current status of the system, generate alerts when thresholds are at risk of being missed, and even executes automated recovery actions for CA Workload Automation AE and CA Workload Automation CA 7 Edition environments.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Workload Automation Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: July 2021

CA Workload Automation iDash Customers

COTA

CA Workload Automation iDash Video

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Mohamed Elazzouzi
Production Systems Engineer at Sofrecom
Real User
Top 20
A solution that offers good performance that's mostly easy to manipulate

What is our primary use case?

We make large-sized architecture for our client.

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution is easy to manipulate and has good performance."
  • "We have difficulties manipulating the agent for Windows."

What other advice do I have?

The solution is really perfect for a big enterprise using more than 100 or 200 applications. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
NVRao
Head Of Service Management at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
An easy initial setup with scalability capabilities and good stability

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for scheduling.

Pros and Cons

  • "The stability of the solution is good. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches and we haven't had any crashes that I can recall."
  • "The technical support could be improved by removing delays in response times. They should be able to get back to clients faster."

What other advice do I have?

I'd recommend the solution. As long as the migration from other software to this one is made easy, it would be good to switch. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.