We had to do a lot of tweaking. It hasn't been stable from the beginning, but with some effort, it can become stable.

It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes.

It is an absolutely stable solution.

From '21 to '22, everything has been quite stable after all the workload migrated to the new platform. Nowadays, it's stable. There are some hiccups, but they are more related to introducing the new changes. Usually, we are able to deal with them in a meaningful timeframe so that they don't affect the customer base too much.

It's very stable.

I would rate its stability capabilities ten out of ten.

In general, its stability is very good. 

We anticipated the load for one year, at least, and we have done load tests. The system is pretty reliable. We have not had even a single issue in production using their product. It's very reliable.

The tool is very stable since we run it on-premises. 

I would rate it around seven out of ten. We haven't encountered significant issues or unavailability of services.

The solution is stable. 

Because we use it only for learning purposes and the solution is not used by more than four - six people at once, we haven't faced any issues.

It is a stable solution. I have not faced any trouble when using the product in my company.

I rate Camunda ten out of ten for stability.

We use it on a daily basis and apart from the timing issues, we haven't had any problems. We have been doing a lot of heavy testing because it's a big, National system.

I haven't had the opportunity to test the solution in an actual working environment yet, as it seems that you haven't deployed it either. Although I have used a modeler extensively, I haven't been able to deploy a solution to a client, so I can't speak to its stability.

Stability-wise, Camunda is good, but sometimes task queries get very slow when we have a large number of tasks.

The product is stable.

It is a stable solution if you have a properly configured server, regardless of the server type you are using (e.g., Apache, Nginx, or others), Camunda remains stable. 

As long as you have a good configuration, you shouldn't face any significant problems.

It is stable.

It is stable. I didn't face any issues in the production or development phase.

I rate the platform's stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is very stable.

Its stability is okay. As far as the performance is concerned, we have our internal architectural constraints, and because of them, it is unstable, but it specifically has nothing to do with Camunda.

As we are still relatively new to this solution, I can't really comment on the stability; however, I know some people in the government who use this solution and they are very satisfied with the stability.

Camunda is very reliable but you need to understand the process engineer execution in order to provide solutions that are synchronized and, thus, stable.

The Camunda Platform is stable enough.

We didn’t have any problems with the Camunda Community Edition on production installations. We do have experience with process instance volumes starting in hundreds a year and up to 10 million a year.

I would rate the stability of the Camunda Platform an eight out of ten.

There are some improvements needed.

It is very stable.

I would say that it is stable, at least up to a certain extent. Whenever there is an update to the product available, we go ahead and update it to the latest.

It's very stable. We've run load tests, and the only problem you'll have with Camunda is, sometimes, when you marry it with other technology like MariaDB, and you put it under high load, it seizes up. Then, when you go to the Camunda people, they say, "Well, what we're building is a tool. We didn't design Camunda to work with every little, specific product." But you'll find that issue with many BPM tools.

Camunda Platform is a stable solution. However, we recently lost a lot of data because the solution's database was down.

I rate Camunda Platform a seven to eight out of ten for stability.

The stability of the product is quite good. You need to have the knowhow to work with it to optimize for best performance with the database and CPU and stuff. But it is a stable and reliable product.  

This solution is stable. I have not experienced any issues with this solution.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

This is a stable solution. 

It's a stable solution. We have not had any issues.

Camunda BPM is a stable solution.

Camunda BPM is very stable.

For modeling it's very stable. At the execution level, I don't have experience.

The stability is quite good. It's not used on a daily basis right now, but when we deploy the application, which is massive, it will be used daily. Camunda is stable, but there is some difficulty in changing the process. 

The stability is fine although we did have some initial problems with it. 

The system is stable. This is why we selected it. Based on other products, we've found the most appropriate results coming out from the Camunda BPM engine. It's very good.

There are occasionally a few bugs, however, we are quite capable of dealing with them.

It is extremely stable.

I haven't had any issues with any instability.

This is a stable product - it works and doesn't disturb me or the IT director.

We've had some issues with the performance of the product, particularly on the cloud deployment. 

The tool is always stable. We have no troubles. I rate the stability an eight to nine out of ten.

The solution is quite stable. We have had only one incident regarding stability. It was something between the IBM web publications server and Camunda, so I cannot say if it was backing Camunda or IBM BPM, and perhaps it was something between the two solutions. But since then everything has been very stable.

The product is stable.

The stability of the product is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

I think this question can be better answered by a developer or someone who is backing the network and server. I'm more concerned with process modeling and the process deployment tasks. But as far as I'm concerned, yes, there hasn't been any problems with stability.

In general, the solution is pretty stable. 

It's hard to get information to size it properly if you don't use a Camunda subscription. That might not really be a Camunda issue; it could be a sizing problem. For example, they have issues with very high usage of the database even when there are very few processes running. I had a situation in which the databases were at 100% and they should not have been. 

We have not had a problem with it, and it's done a significant number of transactions on our test system. It seems to be very stable.

It is stable and I don't have any problems with it.

I think that stability is fine, although if you are using your own solution it can be complex. We developed our own backend, and it is working fine.

It's a stable solution. 

We have not had any issues in the three months that we have been using it.

I did not encounter stability problems.

Even in the community versions the product is very stable and with excellent scalability results.

None.

Camunda Platform is stable.

It has been stable so far. There is no problem with it.