The price is very good.

Once you buy the license, Linux will provide you with yearly or monthly patches, so your systems will be scalable for a long time. You can decide whether or not you want to install a patch. They're giving patches instead of going for automatic updates because some of the services will not work.

CentOS is an open-source tool.

We used it as an open-source solution. We did not have to worry about licensing. 

I do not handle licensing. It's not in my scope of work.

I can't speak to the pricing. The DevOps team handles that aspect of the product. 

The solution is open source. Sometimes I donate a little bit of money to support the solution.

We are using the community version. It is free.

There are zero licensing costs for the solution. 

There are admin costs. We run it on VMware, so there has to be VMware cost.

It's freeware, so we can use it without worrying about licensing.

The cost depends on how the organization or a specific person licenses it. If you want the free version, there's Ubuntu which is supported by forums. You can pay for the license yearly or pay for a specific version.

The licensing is per device.

If a company cannot afford Red Hat, they should use this product.

It's an open-source solution.

I'm not well-versed in licensing. It's almost free. The cost is very, very low. 

We're using the open-source version of CentOS.

This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved.

We don’t have to pay for the system’s licenses.

The solution is open-source. We do not pay a licensing fee. 

For the enterprise version of CentOS, there is a license required. However, for personal use, I do not need a license.

We use the free, open-source solution because we cannot afford the price for Linux. 

The central source is under an open-source license. I use it this way due to the fact that I don't need any license for using it.

There is no price or licensing required — it's open-source. 

We are using the community version, which is free. 

You can pay for the support if you purchase Red Hat. We don't have the need for that just yet, and CentOS satisfies our needs when needed (assuming we can support it in-house).

The license is affordable. I rate the price a ten out of ten.

It is open-source, which means it is a free product. It has a one-time deployment cost.

Buy a Red Hat license. It's worth it.

The solution is open-source and does not have any costs or licensing fees.

CentOS is cheaper compared to Windows.

CentOS is free.

There are no additional costs.

The pricing is very reasonable. From what I understand, we pay a minimal fee, if we pay anything at all.

I use the free version.

There are no costs for CentOS, it is open-source.

There are no licensing fees for CentOS. It's a DPL project, there is no licensing cost.

The solution is open source so it is free. 

This is an open source solution.  

This product is free to use. It's great for companies with small budgets.

CentOS is an expensive solution. There are other solutions that are rated at the top that are not expensive, such as Red Hat or Oracle Linux.

The solution is not subscription-based, unlike Red Hat. It involves recompiled binaries, so it does not come with a subscription fee. 

Nothing.

We have no complaints about the price, which is quite reasonable.

We have a CentOS license that we pay for on a yearly basis.

This is a free solution.

CentOS is a free solution.

There is no license required for this solution.

There are no licensing costs for CentOS.

This solution is much more cost effective than Windows and the Open Source options.

I always advise using free software (like CentOs) because it has all the necessary tools for the universities and CPD. The Asus platform has remote management activated, without any licensing. With other server manufacturers, I would suggest it is necessary to ask for remote management licensing.

There are no licensing fees. CentOS is a free solution.

It is free.

No experience.

We are using a subscription-based license option for CentOS.

I'm not required to pay a licensing fee.