Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Previous Solutions
We previously used Symantec as our email security solution, but we had many complaints about its slowness. We also used Tipping Point, but we had to upgrade it biweekly and their customer support was not very good. That's why we are replacing both of those solutions with Check Point.
View full review »The McAfee solution was used earlier.
We used their services due to a long term key association of theirs with us.
View full review »AS
Ana Salguero
Complaints analysis/investigation at compugana
There was no solution before we implemented this product.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SJ
reviewer2130000
Java DeveloperJava at Playtech
I have not worked with products from other vendors.
View full review »We did not use a different solution.
View full review »We had an internal security solution developed by PCC Web Solutions, however, we switched on Check Point due to the larger scope of utility features at affordable pricing.
View full review »I am using this solution for the first time. The experience so far has been great.
View full review »We have been using Check Point Security solutions for quite some time now. Before that, we used a local customized security solution from one of our affiliated vendors. It was a bit expensive and ranked low on accuracy and efficacy. We switched to Check Point after that.
View full review »I haven't dealt with any other software.
We only had Office 365 and wanted to make the security more robust.
View full review »BD
Basil Dange
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Previously, we were using the email gateway along with an additional license to protect against email attacks on the same gateway.
View full review »CK
Chitharanjan K
Executive IT Operations at Indian Immunologicals Limited
We previously used a third-party product that was hosted in the cloud.
View full review »NG
N Guzman
Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Previously, Microsoft technology was used, however, we did not like it.
We moved to Check Point.
View full review »JH
reviewer2029350
Database Administrator at Ordina
I have not used different products and have no plans of leaving this platform.
View full review »We previously used Protonmail. It was not as compatible according to my usability.
View full review »OP
Oleg Pekar
Senior Network/Security Engineer at Skywind Group
No, it's the first NGFW with email protection we onboarded.
View full review »We have used other security products by vendors such as Juniper and Palo Alto, but not for the same use cases.
View full review »LD
Leo Diaz
Cloud Support at a tech company with 1-10 employees
We used email security and anti-spam tools from Microsoft. However, we prefer to have all security solutions centralized.
View full review »Previously we used security functions of Microsoft 365, however we wanted to modernize ourselves with a robust tool, which had prestige in addition to centralizing our security environments, for which we preferred to use checkpoint.
View full review »I did not use a different solution previously.
View full review »VN
reviewer1572915
System and Network Administrator at Auriga - The banking e-volution
Previously, there was no specific solution and we relied on the local antispam engine installed on the clients.
View full review »Yes, I previously used a GFI solution. I switched because the GFI solution worked with the Microsoft ISA firewalls and I moved to a different platform.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.