The scalability depends on the gateway and deployment. A stronger gateway can support more users. The cluster configuration also affects scalability. For example, two active gateways can be used for the VPN. We have 100-200 users using this solution since we use it for IT personnel. We are in progress and we are trying to change our primary ETM product. It will go to Check Point for a POC on a larger scale. I rate the solution’s scalability a four or five out of ten.

I was impressed by the scalability of this platform throughout our company, mainly since this solution emerged as the main use within the C-Level area of our company. It does not neglect some cloud-based apps when out of the office. The scalability of this platform made it possible for us to implement it in most areas of the company in order to strengthen remote work.

The solution offers high scalability as far as adding more users. I don't see that as being an issue.

We have 330-350 users in our company who are using the Check Point VPN.

When it comes to VPN products, our company talks about putting them on another internet gateway, which seems to be an easy process. Using the scalability feature of the product seems to be a painless process, in my opinion.

It is an absolutely scalable solution.

The solution can be easily scaled by adding a security gateway.

It is a scalable solution.

Considering that access to the solution is given to specific people only in my company, I can say that around 100 to 150 people use the solution.

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

In our organization, approximately 3,000 users work on Check Point Remote Access VPN. The number may go up if we hire more employees.

Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution.

The solution can be easily scaled by adding a security gateway and general security and is very robust.

This is great and scalable product.

It is very easy to manage the solution and also the integration.

The solution is scalable. We have 80 or 90 users on the product.

It is not extensively used. 

I get the impression this could scale up to whatever you need. Scaling issues might only be moving to clustered resources and setting up load balancing on gateways. Once you get big enough you should be able to scale up to your needs.

The solution is scalable. 

I am impressed by the performance of this tool.

The performance is excellent.

With Check Point VSX, the virtual instance extension is just an additional license, thus, it's very easy to add VS for other purposes. Besides Check Point also developed Maestro technology to allow hyperscale, increase throughput, and maximize capacity.

The scalability is great.

Scalability is good. We have more than 500 users who are working on it.

We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.

This solution is scalable in cluster and VSS architectures.

I haven't discussed scalability with customers to get their take on how easy it is. 

The scalability is great. We deploy to 5000+ users.

Nearly all of the company's 700 users used the solution during the COVID-19 emergency.

The tool is scalable. We may need to opt for higher boxes. We work with enterprise customers.

The connection has gotten less smooth as the number of users increases. The issue is that the logs fill up quickly. Too many users are connecting remotely. It worked great when we only had a few remote connections. Now, it is disconnecting people and dropping the internet connection.

It fills the logs and cuts off our connection when it gets full. It stops working. It's time-consuming to reset the device and reload the backups. It takes us about two hours because we would need to reconfigure those routes and integrate them with the IP addresses we have set up.

The solution is licensed-based, so to scale up we only need to add more licenses.

The scalability of the product is reasonable.

For me, the scalability is very good.

We have approximately 2,000 users using this solution. We have plans to increase the usage of the solution.

The Gateway side part of the software scales well.

The solution is easily scalable.

I can't speak to the scalability aspect. We don't have a need to scale. We have about 1,200 users and that's all we need. Therefore, I've never tried to scale it previously.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution. We do not have plans to increase usage at this time.

The solution is really scalable. You have to know that if you want to scale the solution you will have to configure and rebuild an SMS server with high CPU/memory resources, however.

Check Point has an Unlimited License Package for the RA VPN and therefore we can scale it easily.

It is pretty scalable as far as adding more users. I don't see that as being an issue. All we have to do is buy more licenses and it's easy to add the license headcount, then more users can be added just as simply.

We have 200 to 250 users in our company.

We will definitely be increasing to have more users since our company was just purchased by a very large company. This will make us grow.

Not all of our clients who use Check Point VPN are in Thailand. Some government agencies, like the Electric City Company, are in Thailand. They use it formally. Their IT and telecom departments, those who require a secure network, are using it.

The stability depends on the setup. If the solution resides on a specific appliance, it is not scalable. It has a fixed capacity. However, if you move it onto different environments, cloud environments, it will become scalable. Right now, we have about 4,000 users in the current network and about 500 remote access users.

Check Point Remote Access VPN has good scalability. Microsoft's operating system has a problem with the solution's new version.

It is very scalable in a way that we can share the configuration for Remote VPN amongst our perimeter firewall so we can implement the Remote VPN with the same profiles and the same configuration easily on all of them. It's very scalable.

We are still studying the possibility of migrating everyone to Check Point VPN, but a decision has to be made because we still have a lot of people using Pulse Secure.

The solution has been very scalable for us up until now. Currently, we have two data centers and we are running two Checkpoints for the facility to spread the workload.

We have about 500 people using this solution in our company during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to that, we had an average of 100 daily users.