Check Point Endpoint Security Competitors and Alternatives

What do you think of Kaspersky Endpoint Security?

Primary Use Case Kaspersky performs well. While heavy on the client, it is very efficient.  • Improvements to My Organization It works better than the previous solution.  • Valuable Features It is very efficient. I like its simplicity. • Room for Improvement We would like to know where attacks are coming from. It is hard to maintain the software and upgrade. Sometimes, there are issues with filtering. E.g., I want to take out the message for an exclusion. Sometimes, this exclusion might become hard, because I use a lot of internal software, or the software is post positive.  • Use of Solution Three to five years. • Stability Issues The product is very stable. • Scalability Issues The scalability is good. • Customer Service and Technical Support I have...

What do you think of McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection?

Valuable Features Dynamic Application Containment Real Protect • Improvements to My Organization With the increase in malware attacks, having a product like this which protects against zero-day attacks is invaluable. • Room for Improvement Signatures to protect against new attacks. • Use of Solution I've used this solution for three months. • Stability Issues No. • Scalability Issues No. • Customer Service and Technical Support Five out of 10. • Previous Solutions No. • Other Solutions Considered No. • Other Advice It's an essential.

What do you think of Symantec Endpoint Protection?

Valuable Features: This handles not just anti-virus, but a wide collection of other protective features including device and application control, network-based intrusions, and phishing attacks. It can also scan virtual machines too. • Room for Improvement: The reputation system relies on having a constant Internet connection for its operations. • Other Advice: There are three versions, include a cloud-based one, that are very flexible and easy to install and manage.