We deployed via an in-house team.

We implemented the solution with the help of a vendor team; they have good documentation and are experts.

We handled the setup in-house.

We handled the implementation in-house.

Initially, we had taken advantage of Check Point expertise. Now, an in-house team can handle everything. It is manageable on our side. 

We worked with the SandBlast team for deployment and that was completed in under three months. We had our initial trial period for two weeks. We had a team of four to five members who worked with the SandBlast teams from a deployment point of view. Everything went pretty smoothly. 

Our experience with the Check Point support team was pretty good. They were able to help us with the deployment and integration for collaboration apps, like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Jira. They also were able to help us with internal apps. So, they were able to help us with all those integration points, which was really helpful.

The staff involved was four to five members. However, we felt that if the SandBlast team was onboard, then we didn't need that many people. We could do the deployment with two members from our side and somebody helping from the SandBlast side.

We implemented through a local implementor.

We implemented the solution via in-house teams.

Deployment was done by the vendor team.

We implemented the product together with the vendor and an in-house team. The vendor team has good knowledge when it comes to implementing the product.

We had assistance from the vendor during deployment and the service is excellent.

We are able to implement the solution for our client. While we have four people involved in pre-sales activity, we have another team that handles the implementation.

It was done by an in-house team.

When the installation was done, a vendor helped us and explained how it worked.

We implemented the product with the help of OEM and our in-house team. There were no major challenges during implementation or even in day-to-day operations.

Our in-house team implemented the tool with vendor support. Vendor support was extremely knowledgeable of the product and its capabilities

We handled the setup with an in-house team. I'd rate the experience foud out of five.

We implemented it with an internal team and when we had doubts, we consulted the manufacturer's support with a totally satisfactory result due to their great experience.

implementation took place through the vendor team.

We used an in-house team to implement the solution. 

We handled the implementation in-house.

We had a consultant assist us in the implementation.

I handled the deployment in-house, myself. 

We implemented the product with the help of our OEM and our in-house team. There were no major challenges during implementation or even in day-to-day operations.

The deployment time varies depending on the complexity of the case. For simple installations, we estimate approximately one week for completion. However, for more intricate setups involving thorough configuration and fine-tuning, the timeframe extends to three to four weeks. Our deployment process begins with in-depth analysis and discussions with the customer to understand their specific needs and infrastructure, including any special features they utilize, such as on-premise email with Exchange. We initially deploy a standard version with a standardized setup, followed by a review period to assess its effectiveness. Subsequently, we fine-tune the configuration based on feedback and requirements, which typically takes about a week. Finally, we roll out the refined setup to endpoints, servers, and other relevant components.

There was high-level expertise from the vendor team during implementation.

We did it ourselves.  Potentially, if I had an open wallet and a blank cheque book, would we use a third-party? Yes, of course we would, but at the moment that option is just not there.

It was through a vendor. They were experts on the product.

In the beginning, we had help from an integrator. It was partly because our in-house team had some trouble understanding how Check Point works, so they had some problems.

We used a vendor team and they were experts in what they were doing.

We handled the implementation in-house.

We had a positive experience with the implementation via a vendor. 

We implemented this product as per the organization's requirements. We did it ourselves.

We did both - we implemented through a vendor and in-house.

The deployment did not take long, the guys who came to the place from Check Point did it very fast, it was a fast thing, within a day or two.

We did the deployment in-house.

We worked directly with the vendor. The vendor had a partner in my region. Therefore, we worked directly with the partner, who was also working with Check Point. So far, the experience has been great. They were efficient. We have been able to achieve the reason why we set up and procured this solution.

We had help from a Check Point solution partner.

We have four engineers handling the deployment and maintence of a large company we are involved with.

We are a vendor.

We did the integration with Tenea, who is a vendor that we have work with for a while now. 

For 100 users of Check Point Harmony Endpoint, we only need one person for maintenance.

We used a consultant, and he was awesome.

We implemented it internally. 

We are Check Point partners. We did it ourselves, in-house.