Check Point SandBlast Network Scalability

AshleyMorales - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud computing at ITQS

It has great scalability with third-party tools and has shown a remarkable ability to adapt.

View full review »
Anuj V. - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at ANALYTICS EDGE

The is the most scalable solution.

View full review »
Adrian Cambronero - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at ITQS

The solution has excellent scalability.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point SandBlast Network. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hugo Alexis Espinoza Naranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
Perimeter Security Administrator at a security firm with 51-200 employees

The solution has been quite scalable. It has allowed us to integrate different devices and, additionally, it has been incorporated into the solutions that we have today on the perimeter.

View full review »
BD
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

This product is scalable on on-premises by adding an appliance, whereas, for cloud-based deployment, it's the responsibility of the OEM.

View full review »
Mitesh D Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Consultant- Cyber Security at Ivalue Infosolution

We have more than 50 customers, including IT heads, CTOs, and all are working on the solution.

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

View full review »
OP
Senior Network/Security Engineer at Skywind Group

I think it may be difficult to scale the Check Point SandBlast Network in cases where you don't have a dedicated software or hardware appliance for it to run on. This is because it requires so much in terms of computing resources to run.

View full review »
JC
CTO at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

It runs on a dedicated hardware appliance. We are pretty small and scaling has not been an issue, but perhaps larger organizations may have a problem.

View full review »
ST
Technology consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

As of now, it is great and there have been no issues observed regarding scalability.

View full review »
BW
Security Engineer at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees

It is definitely scalable. We have a massive amount of endpoints that it's working through right now, and it's definitely taking care of us.

View full review »
WL
Information Security Engineer (Core Network Security) at NEX4 ICT Solutions

The solution is easy to scale. It's not a problem to expand. Check Point is known for its ability to scale. 

We have three or four clients using the product.

View full review »
RS
Sr Network Engineer at Columbus Regional Airport Authority

We're small. The new Maestro option is impressive. It is nice to know that we could move into this Maestro product and move away from an Active-Passive firewall cluster to an Active-Active, then if we needed it for computer bandwidth, we could easily add something. That is very awesome.

View full review »
Eduardo Barcelos - PeerSpot reviewer
Sales Engineer at Tempest Security Intelligence

Check Point SandBlast Network is scalable.

We have approximately 5,000 users using this solution.

View full review »
RW
Network & Cyber Security Specialist at HKICL

I rate SandBlast seven out of 10 for scalability. SandBlast is more difficult to scale than FortiSandbox.

View full review »
SC
Network Engineer at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees

In terms of the scalability, it is expandable across the cloud.

View full review »
ST
Technology consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Overall scalability has been a good experience. 

View full review »
MY
Security Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

It seems scalable.

View full review »
PD
Associate Consult at Atos

Scalability is very good.

View full review »
AA
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The scalability is very good. It is easy to scale and use.

View full review »
HT
Security Analyst at Security4IT

It is scalable. We can just add more computers into the solution if the equipment becomes obsolete or their capacity reaches its maximum. We just need to use a bigger appliance. However, we have no experiences regarding this, as usually the equipment is better than the customer's needs.

In my company, there are maybe 50 users. It's not a very big company, so everyone has their function, but most of them are technicians. Other users are sellers, directors, supervisors, and security analysts (like me). If we consider that every worker has one computer, we can say that there are about 50 computers using this solution.

View full review »
ES
Network Technician at BUYPASS AS

We don't have any problems with scalability. It depends on the bandwidth because we are talking to the cloud.

View full review »
it_user830025 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Security Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

In terms of scalability. CloudGuard looks amazing. The auto-scaling, the HA, or whatever option you select, I like it. It will add bang for the buck once we get it in there, and finalize it. It should work as designed. Then, I'll be ecstatic.

View full review »
JC
Director at Compugraf

Scalability has been a problem for some of the bigger Brazilian financial companies that we work with. However, it has been okay for the smaller companies. 

View full review »
MM
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We have 10 customer companies. They are mid-sized enterprises with between 100 and 200 users.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point SandBlast Network. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.