Cisco AMP for Endpoints Competitors and Alternatives

Get our free report covering McAfee, Sophos, CrowdStrike, and other competitors of Cisco AMP for Endpoints. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of Cisco AMP for Endpoints competitors and alternatives

NRG LTD
Real User
Manager at EZ Computers Ltd.
Sep 25 2019

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of this solution is the management. The management center to it is fantastic. I set it up so that it goes over the internet from one site to… more»

How has it helped my organization?

This product is very good at what it does. It's very pro-active and not reactive. If you're running a company, it makes administration a lot easier.

What needs improvement?

Everything has some kind of room for improvement.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This solution is a good value for the money.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

I have used nearly all of these kinds of solutions throughout my career, and this is the one that I tend to go back to because it's all there. Specifically, I have used… more»

What other advice do I have?

This is a good, all-in product. Even the home, end-user products by this vendor are very good. If you're serious about endpoint security then this is the only product you… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Cisco has been marketing its Umbrella solution, and it is a very good product, but it is also very expensive. It is not economical, whereas ESET falls perfectly right… more»
CTIo67
Real User
CIO / CTO at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Sep 05 2019

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the integration with Check Point's firewalls. You can have one port, and follow the logs from both Endpoint and firewall security.

What needs improvement?

The solution could improve VPN functionality and the VPN user-interface.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

We previously had a Cisco solution.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others considering implementing the solution is, depending of course on if the company is looking for a new kind of firewall solution, is "Don't do it yourself." I would rate the solution… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated a few solutions, including Cylance. We evaluated the existing solutions and compared them to Check Point.
Real User
Systeem / Netwerkbeheerder at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Sep 24 2019

What do you think of FortiClient?

What is our primary use case?

We use the private deployment model of this solution. Our cloud provider is Microsoft. Our primary use case of FortiClient is for administrative purposes.

What is most valuable?

The configuration is the most valuable feature. It is also simple and easy to use. 

What needs improvement?

The pricing could use improvement. It should be cheaper.  The reporting can also always be better. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using FortiClient for a few months now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have around ten users using this solution. They are primarily system administrators. We require only three people for the maintenance. 

How are

Get our free report covering McAfee, Sophos, CrowdStrike, and other competitors of Cisco AMP for Endpoints. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email