Cisco Secure Endpoint Stability
NG
Neal Gravatt
Sr Network Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 1-10 employees
It's stable. We only had one or two instances, over five years and 3,000 computers, where the agent has stopped working and we had to reinstall it. That's a pretty high percentage of availability, like 99.9 percent of the time there have been no problems.
View full review »Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
There are no issues or drops in the solution's performance.
It definitely seemed very stable.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Endpoint
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Endpoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The tool is stable.
View full review »It's reliable. We haven't had any problems so far.
View full review »The stability of the solution is definitely a 10 out of 10. I have no problems with that at all. It's consistent across the board and that's perfect.
View full review »For stability, I would rate the product an eight out of ten as there has been significant improvement. If this were a year or two ago, the rating would be five or six. Now it's stable.
View full review »Cisco Secure Endpoint has been around for a long time. I see it only integrating more into Cisco's platform and product line. It'll be a cornerstone of a lot of the threat-hunting stuff that Cisco's working on at Cisco Secure.
View full review »MB
Mark Bonnamy
Technical Director at Ridgewall
The stability is very good. We've had no issues with performance or things crashing. That aspect has all been very positive. When doing as much as these products are doing, it can create quite an overhead and take a toll on the performance of PCs, but we have had none of that kind of experience.
We are predominantly a Microsoft environment. I'm aware that it supports Mac, but I don't think we have any installations across Mac environments at the moment. From a Windows standpoint, it works very well. It hasn't caused instability. It hasn't affected performance in a negative way. All those things are really positive, given what it's actually doing.
View full review »TC
Tim Crosweller
IT Manager at van der Meer Consulting
I have had a couple of instances in the time that we have had the solution:
- It got too smart for itself and detected an Adobe Reader update as malicious, blocking all PDFs. They remediated that fairly quickly.
- There was an issue with a connector merging at the start of the coronavirus when we were going into lockdown and sending people to work from home. This caused some issues, but they found that very quickly and were able to remediate it. We were able to roll the connector back.
These issues do pop up from time to time. With any software, there can be upgrades and issues that cause problems.
Overall, the stability of the program and software have been very good.
The product has improved considerably over the last 12 to 18 months. They have done a lot of updates to the console and connector. The connector interaction with the workstation has been minimized. The visibility inside the console has improved.
View full review »It's very stable.
View full review »DT
DanTurner
CIO at Per Mar Security and Research Corporation
It's rock-solid. I don't think there's more to say there. It's just a rock-solid solution.
View full review »RM
Russell MELLON
Director of I.T. Services at a non-tech company with 201-500 employees
In my experience, this product is very stable.
View full review »I would rate the stability nine out of ten.
View full review »After the presence and use of the solution in our company for three years, I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten.
JG
John Gardner
Director of Technical Services at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
The solution is rock solid.
View full review »Stability is below average. There have been several issues with frequency of release, feature release and wait time for overhanging time-bombs.
From a customer stand-point, these released are aimed at fixing known bugs from last release and introducing new features either in beta or live versions. However, this means that an enterprise running 50K+ endpoints need to go through the rigors of setting up test/dev/qa/pilot then production for iteration, so as to limit the blast radius.
This can be tasking if as the frequency increases.
CK
Celso Kuwajima
Engineer at Innovo
We had a couple of deferred releases this year.
I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten.
LC
reviewer1895508
Manager information security at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's very stable.
View full review »ED
reviewer1586604
System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
II haven't had any issues with it except for a connector issue. They quickly put out a new one and got rid of the problem. So, it seems to be really stable, and they seem to be reactive when there is a problem.
View full review »CT
Cole Two-Bears
Systems Architect at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
With most applications, whether it's AV or some type of IDS/IPS running on an endpoint, you will have some type of performance hit or degradation of the endpoint's performance. Out of all the devices that we've put AMP on, which is around a 1,000 devices at this point, we have only had one device that had a problem with performance using AMP. So, we were able to go through and tune the policy from the AMP console for that one endpoint. The overall view of AMP's performance is very good.
View full review »I am highly satisfied with the stability. I would rate it nine out of ten.
ZS
reviewer1150365
Solution Architect / Presales Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability is good.
View full review »MM
reviewer2108991
Technical Engineer at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We do not have any challenges, and we are fine with it. We are using it only for external endpoints, and we are very comfortable with it.
View full review »HB
reviewer1384002
Security Officer at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees
It is very stable. I haven't noticed it being unstable. It is what it is and does what it does.
On a regular basis, we have four or five network security engineers working on its deployment and maintenance.
View full review »EL
Edvins Logins
IT Security Services Owner at Atea AS
So far, so good.
View full review »JA
reviewer2212620
Technical Advisor at a government with 10,001+ employees
It's pretty reliable.
View full review »WH
Wouter Hindriks
Technical Team Lead Network & Security at Missing Piece BV
The stability is very good. We have had no issues with the console. It has always been available. The connector also runs well.
View full review »PS
Pardeep Sharma
Network security engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Cisco AMP for Endpoints is very reliable.
View full review »ST
MD.SIHAB TALUKDAR
System Engineer at asa
This is a stable product.
View full review »Cisco AMP for Endpoints has been very stable so far.
View full review »RZ
ChiefInfc2bb
Chief Information Officer at Sacramento County
The stability seems to work well.
View full review »MS
Mohammad Siraj
Deputy GM at Oregon Systems
The solution's stability is perfect. It's the best. All the customers we have sold it to have been super happy. We mostly work with SMEs, small and medium-sized enterprises.
View full review »MS
Mohammad Siraj
Deputy GM at Oregon Systems
The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Endpoint
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Endpoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.