Cisco ASA NGFW Competitors and Alternatives
Read reviews of Cisco ASA NGFW competitors and alternatives
Review of Sophos
May 25 2019
What is most valuable?The application filters available with Sophos XG are brilliant. The sandboxing and the way the firewall or the UTM integrates with the installed endpoint antivirus clients… more»
How has it helped my organization?I have a serious problem because our offices are scattered around the world in very remote areas. We cannot deploy proper branch office guides, active directory sites, and… more»
What needs improvement?There was a big issue with the Cyberoam and with the SG units as well, i.e. the previous Sophos UTM model. With Sophos XG, you get the chance to block what sites operate… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?We have the annual license for Sophos XG. It all depends on what you would like to have in the package that you are purchasing.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?I used Cyberoam previously, although I always used it as a UTM only. What made me move to Sophos is that they were acquired, i.e. they acquired Cyberoam to start with the… more»
What other advice do I have?I recommend that everyone should have a proper understanding of new network requirements and then enjoy it. Sophos XG is definitely a good product. On a scale of 1 to 10… more»
Which other solutions did I evaluate?I evaluated FortiGate but wasn't happy with it. I evaluated another group called WatchGuard. WatchGuard has good features in it, but it's for a smaller business scale than… more»
Review of Check Point
Jul 03 2019
What is most valuable?The policies that you can use with this equipment are valuable. This is very nice for us; it responded to our requirements for the application to go to the internet. So… more»
How has it helped my organization?This solution improved our email service, with less presence on the internet blacklist.
What needs improvement?The solution could be improved by creating or including in the product enforcement of some kind to deal with cybersecurity and all the new kinds of attacks we are dealing… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?I cannot tell you the pricing, but we paid for three years. There aren't any other costs above the standard licensing and fess. We bought it, we use it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?We started with the Cisco PIX. The equipment was at the end of its life.
What other advice do I have?If we're talking about value, in my opinion, the financial institutions are the companies that I see that can use this most. I like it because it's user-friendly. You can… more»
Which other solutions did I evaluate?We evaluated Cisco ASA and FortiGate.
Review of Palo Alto Networks
Jul 21 2019
What is most valuable?The most valuable features are the threat prevention and policy-based routing features.
What needs improvement?I think they need to have a proper hardware version for a smaller enterprise. We had to go to a very high-end version which is very expensive. If we chose the lower-end version, it would not meet our goals. A middle-end is missing in its… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?It's a bit pricey.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?We did previously have a different kind of a firewall. We used Check Point before. We also used NetScreen and Cisco. But in the end, we defined our standard and now use Palo Alto.
What other advice do I have?Once you install it, you use it every day. You can't stop because it's a security feature and a precaution. Also, we are using it to do some local breakouts, so we use utilize the local internet to carry some business traffic, to ensure… more»
Review of Check Point
Sep 11 2019
What is most valuable?As per the solution's blade design, there are many options. For example, you have to buy a UTM blade and an advanced malware blade, etc. If the blade license is there, we can configure from the firewall GUI. The net policy and routing are… more»
What needs improvement?If you compare the GUI with the Palo Alto and Cisco, they're very easy. Check Point, due to its design, is a little bit complex. They should make the GUI easy to use so that anyone can understand it, like Fortinet's GUI. Many companies end… more»
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?Compared to Cisco Firepower Threat Defense, the solution is cheap. However, not as cheap as Fortinet or Palo Alto. If clients have smaller budgets, we would have to advise one of those instead.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?I am currently also working on Cisco ASA, Fortinet, and Palo Alto.
What other advice do I have?There are two deployment model modes in Check Point. One is a gateway level and one is a no gateway all-in-one box solution. With the gateway level, only hardware will be there, all operating systems are stored in a VMware and if there are… more»
Review of Fortinet
Aug 22 2019