Some improvements are needed in scalability. When user traffic is high, there are performance issues depending on the user and the link used to connect. Cisco is providing enough bandwidth to manage the routing, so there's room available and there shouldn't be lags in performance. 

We have a mix of 500 users including our programming team that does in-house development and our administrative team. 

Cisco Cloud Services Router is a scalable product.

You need to pay the licenses; the higher the license fee, the higher the computing power and the resources consumed. Cisco Cloud Services Router is pretty scalable for my company's use cases.

It is definitely scalable. It can handle a lot more traffic and group work compared to any other products that I've evaluated. It could easily scale a lot more than what I'm doing right now. I have about 12 environments going through the CSR and about 4 vendors. I could easily double that.

We are a huge consumer of Cisco products. We have about ten routers and firewalls with more than 30 odd switches. So, it's a huge infrastructure.

The product scales very well. The size of our environment is three VPCs and about 30 EC2 instances.

Scalability is very good, as long as you are paying for the licensing to support it.

The size of our environment is about 400 servers and 300 users.

We have at least more than 60 CSRs deployed and the scale works well. Scalability has not been an issue. 

In AWS, the size of my environment is relatively small at the moment. I only have 45 VMs.

This solution is scalable.

It scales vertically, but it just costs a lot more.

With the on-premise, they are pushing their newer services routers so they have the same function as the cloud service routers do. However, because the price points are so high, they will rate limit your interface to bring the price down. Therefore, it is the same model that they are already doing in the cloud, but they are now moving that model into on-premise.

The scalability is there. If a company needs to scale this solution, it can do so.

This solution is more on the virtual side and you can handle a lot of virtual networks. At the same time, it does have some limitations on how much you can scale.

We have approximately 200 people who use this solution in our company.

There is no doubt that this Cisco solution is scalable. I do expect to scale more in the future.

We have customers who have huge infrastructures, and others with small infrastructures. In terms of size, our customers have around 100 or 200 employees (or connections). Our biggest customer has approximately 3000 employees.

For my environment it is a good solution.