Cisco Email Security (ESA) Benefits

Informate83d
Information Security Analyst at a healthcare company
One of the things that I like most is that, since we do have a Cisco Enterprise agreement - we have a lot of Cisco products - we're able to consolidate reporting a lot better. Reportability is a lot more end-user accessible, or easier to acquire. The solution overall does what it does, but being able to quantify that, put it into reports that are easy to analyze, is probably the best and the largest gain that we acquired in switching. View full review »
RegionalICT835j
Regional ICT Security Officer EMEA at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
When we first had Cisco hardware, we were having significant problems in that we were getting something like 10,000 emails per device per hour. We have four devices, so if we calculate that up it was like 1,000,000 emails a day, and most of those, about 99 percent, were junk mail or spam. We had a major problem with email, and introducing Cisco ESA systems was a set change for us. It reduced the number of unwanted emails by a huge factor. That has continued to be the case, from when we first got the devices, until today. Previously, we had other email security appliances, and they were overwhelmed by the volume of email that we are receiving as a company. The introduction of the ESA systems had two effects for us: * They significantly reduced the number of emails that were even considered for delivery or for being accepted into our company for internal routing. * It gave us another line of defense. We use the ESA systems as our first line of defense which we then follow up by another manufacturer's email security appliance, which gives us a second level. Subsequent to that, we've adopted another layer of email security. So we now run three layers. View full review »
HeadOfSe948f
Security Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
In regards to what we filter out, we don't have a lot of information. We have a small team who handles most of the software, including the email filtering and email security. The solution drops bad email, like the spam or emails with viruses. We are not currently doing further analysis to indicate what was really targeted, or determining if something else with generated, malicious or spam. The filtering is okay, and we don't have complaints from our customers or users, so we aren't doing any further steps. The email processing and event logging are very detailed and valuable. They are also helpful when we troubleshoot email issues and perform email analysis, even though the logs are not structured properly. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Messaging Security. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
John Agunbiade
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We used to get emails with viruses that would impact the business or we would get emails with malware. We were able to scan the email and clear it or block emails with viruses. That was the business justification. On a weekly basis, it was blocking about 2,000 or 2,500 emails. It protects you, it protects your network, it protects you from phishing emails and malicious content and the like. View full review »
Jean Gabriel Dick
IT Infrastructure at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're consolidating two to three arrays down to one which means that our data center footprint has decreased by like 90%. So we're saving 90% of our space, and it also is much better on power and everything else in our data center. And on top of that, the performance is much, much better than our older arrays. View full review »
MichaelLawrence
Network Security Engineer at Konga Online Shopping Ltd
From a security standpoint, IronPort really helped with the mail filtering and load balancing between the Exchange servers they had. IronPort enabled us to blockade domains that send these emails. IronPort gave us fantastic service. By the time I administered it, I was able to block some 25 or more domains. View full review »
Ed Dallal
Founder, CEO, & President at Krystal Sekurity
It means less malicious email, fewer interruptions, and less risk. It actually circumvents malicious emails; rather than getting to the users, the users don't see them. End of story. There's a risk without it. The user might get the email and might click on the link. Once that happens, they are toast, as is the network. The number of malicious emails it blocks differs from one company to another. It depends on the volume of email they get. I would say on average, depending on how many users there are, it could block 1,000 emails a day. View full review »
Keith Kroslow
Senior Email Engineer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
At one point, there was a zero-day attack. The Cisco appliance detected it and stopped it, helping us out. We avoided the attack and potential damage. View full review »
Mir Mustafa Ali
Network Engineer at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
We need to differentiate among users with specific boundaries. Some users have full access and some users only have limited access. That is what we are using it for. View full review »
Muhammad Qureshi
Network Security Consulting Engineer at a manufacturing company
Before we had ESA, so we had more spam emails. In fact, we had some other solutions in place, but there was more spam going to the Exchange Server when we compare between we didn't have ESA deployed and when we deployed it. We cannot say it's 100 percent, but we're covered for 90 to 95 percent of spam. No spam is going to the user right now. View full review »
Rizwan Siddiqi
Network Security Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It saves a lot of time wasting. For example, phishing attacks distract a user's attention, and forged emails waste a lot of time. A user can lose data. This solution helps protect user data. View full review »
Syed A. Raheem
Group Head of Cyber Security at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Less spam means more productivity; less time is wasted, helping both users and the security team. View full review »
Sofiane Medhkour
Head System /Solution Architect at sorfert
This product has made my messaging platform more secure. it contain and extended security feature ,policy rules for filtering , and multiple engine for scaning add to that encription , security is very important for critical business with data inhouse. View full review »
Setu Bandhan Saha
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Because we can customize policies with it, we have good documentation. View full review »
Wouter Hindriks
Senior Network Administrator at a tech services company
The system enables end users to manage their own whitelists/blacklists and provides our service desk with the means to troubleshoot email delivery issues with ease. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Proofpoint, Fortinet and others in Messaging Security. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email