It's a stable solution. 

Stability has been excellent for us. We've been up and running on it for about eighteen months now, and we're in the process of expanding. We have a goal to have about six thousand users up and running by the end of this year.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

We have servicing contracts with all parts of our infrastructure, but with HyperFlex you typically only need one person to manage aspects such as implementation and configuration. It does not need much in the way of maintenance, which makes working with it very easy.

The one problem we have, though, is that when you have 20-50 VMs and you want to do updates for either HyperFlex or VMware, there's usually a bit of extra work to do in this process, not knowing whether your interventions or updates will cause problems. But overall, it's easy, and I would rate HyperFlex's stability a ten out of ten.

This is a stable product.

Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is stable. However, this solution has a lot of dependencies, and if there is a single point of failure the solution will be impacted.

In terms of stability, during the setup, there are a lot of issues, however, it's not really related to HyperFlex. It might be hardware issues. However, once fixed, you don't need to do any maintenance except upgrades. Once it's fixed, it is very smooth.

The tool is stable.

Initially, HyperFlex wasn't so stable but from the last update, it's been very stable.

Cisco HyperFlex is stable. We faced some issues because it has single dependency on the caching disk, and when that goes down it all goes down. It has only happened once. That aside, it's a stellar solution.

It's a stable solution. Sometimes we face an issue regarding the hard disk. We might find that it's unhealthy and must be replaced by Cisco. This can be easily monitored. 

Cisco HyperFlex HX is very stable and reliable.

I have a really high opinion of Cisco since I've been selling Cisco for quite some time and I have deployed it a lot. So far, the stability and the quality are really, really good. I have no issues with the stability and quality of Cisco. 

This solution was not stable when we originally implemented it. However, over the last eighteen months or so, the updates have made it stable and actually usable for us.

Stability is great. I found that with Cisco hardware in general, i.e. anything on the UCS or HyperFlex side.

It's extremely stable.

Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series is a stable solution.

Cisco HyperFlex HX is fairly stable. We don't have any problems with it. I would give stability an eight out of ten.

So far we have had no issues with the stability of the product. It seems very stable and has performed as expected.

The solution is stable. However, we have had a memory overflow error, that has not to be resolved but it is only a cosmetic error. 

I would rate the stability as high. The machines are stable and the downtime is minimal

It isn't stable so far because the problem is that you have to update your version, and then also update your firmware to the latest development. If you're using an old version of any of them, it makes trouble. That is a challenge we are facing, but it is okay. The solution handled an enterprise where they switch the workload and run it every day, so it is stable in that way.

The solution is extremely stable. I work in Hyperflex. The customer can simply send. 

Stability is 50/50 at the moment, based on the implementation experience.

The stability of the solution has never been a problem. I would say it is excellent.

We deployed a couple of MySQL database servers and some portals which are connected and hosted outside on the internet and the deployment is still going well. So far it is stable and working fine. The deployment is still going on, the migration of further applications is happening.

In terms of stability, it's way more stable than when it first came out. The earlier evolutions of this were like building the plane as we were flying it.

The stability is quite good on the solution. It's not buggy or glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is reliable. 

So far, it's been fairly stable.

The stability has been really good. We haven't had any issues since it's been in production for the last six to nine months.

The solution is stable, it has been able to perform all the tasks we have used it for. It is very reliable.

It is stable. There are no issues.

It is very stable. I've been running one cluster since 2016 with no outages. I've got two other clusters that have been running flawlessly.

As far as the server is performing, everything is good. There have been no problems and no downtime. We haven't been using it a long time but up until now it has been stable.

We have been using this solution for about two years and nothing has happened. We have had no downtime yet. I believe it will work perfectly over the long-term.

It is stable.

It's very stable. We had no issues with downtime.

The stability works fine. 

I rate the solution's stability as a ten.

HyperFlex is very stable because it has complete solutions for networking and computing from Cisco.

No problem with stability. I have a customer and I have not spoken to him since the last upgrade one year ago. He didn't face any problem.

Before I got the second group of this system, I would have said it was quite stable. However, with the second cluster that I received, I experienced lots of hardware issues, and almost all with the RAM stick. The memory stick had been replaced by Cisco due to some hardware failure. It was really painful, and we couldn't sort out the reason. Also we experienced some hard drive failures for which Cisco provided a replacement. So I would say it's not quite stable.

It has very high rate of hardware failure.

It is not a stable solution.

It's been stable since we set it up. It's been very stable and providing good service. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable, and the performance is good. We haven't had issues with bugs or glitches. 

The stability is great. I can pull the power cord from one of my servers, and everything will keep on running. Then, the VMs will be automatically transferred to another server and the user won't notice anything. If we had two sites, we can down an entire data center without issue.

This is a reliable solution

So far, the stability has been good. Since we implemented six months ago, we haven't had any issues. We were able to upgrade the code without interrupting the service, which is good.

It is absolutely stable. 

The stability is very good. I have never seen problems with the clusters or any component of the solution. It's very stable.

The solution is stable.

The stability is great but ultimately we've noticed the updates and upgrades take a bit of an impact on the solution. More so, having to reboot the solution and having to restart it. While it is stable, rebooting it for updates isn't always convenient. Ultimately, just like any organization, we would do that on off hours whether it be weekends, nights, or whatnot. But that costs money because you have to have staff on weekends, nights and whatever overtime they have to account for.

100 / 100

We haven't had any downtime. It is absolutely stable.

We did not have stability issues until now.

HyperFlex has been very stable. It was implemented at our bank a year ago and has had no downtime.

It is a stable solution.

Stability is good so far, but there is a lot of learning. A lot of things are dependent on VMs. There are controlled VMs and you have to always make sure to keep those VMs up and running.

There is a lot of learning involved with ACI. That's huge. The technology which goes around HyperFlex, you have to learn, i.e. ACI, HyperFlex, VMware, etc.

It works as expected.

We started in an early firmware version, so the software release version was a little unstable in the beginning. Now, it is good.

HyperFlex performs very well.

Stability is very good. 

The solution is very stable. It doesn't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very good.

Stability is really poor, especially the storage stability. We lost data. There were disruptions of clusters and that's one big pain point of the solution. It's not stable enough, the documentation is not good, there's not much documentation available. We need a tech engineer for every call. 

It is quite new solution, so it is not very stable. However, that is okay.

There are no problems with the stability of the solution.

I am not in a position to discuss the solution's stability, as I do not work too closely with Hyperflex.

The solution is reliable.

It's very stable. 

In terms of the stability, we can't get it to work. We have one or two VMs online but nothing we could say to get an overview of it.

We are happy with the stability.

I have found Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series to be reliable and stable.

The platform itself is very stable and robust, but when it comes to upgrading the system, it's not stable. The process of upgrading should be seamless so that the customer's data is not affected in any way. Nothing should happen to the customer's data during the upgrading process but we've had situations where the upgrade process did not go smoothly. We've had to open a tech case to solve the issues and sometimes we even have to evacuate the entire virtual machine clusters into another system. 

We've had some downtime, but it's 99.5% stable. They can trust it. Hospitals are 24/7 driven, so we need to have a high uptime which is why we use HyperFlex.

We had some trouble during the implementation, but it was one of the first versions and everything is fine now. Stability was only an issue at the beginning.

Performance-wise, everything is good. So far, we haven't had any issues. There has been no downtime at all.

The product is stable. No one complains about the stability, which is fabulous.

The system runs. It has crashed. We haven't experienced any issues.

It is very stable.

We don't know yet, as it is new.

The stability works well. We have had no issues so far.

The stability has not really improved. Also, their upgrades are complicated. This is something that needs to be fixed, which I'm sure they'll do.