The scalability is actually fine. I thought it might not be as scalable as other brands, but it's been working well for us.

Regarding scalability, our organization primarily focuses on private network solutions for customers. Approximately seventeen percent of medium enterprises have opted for Meraki over other solutions like Fortinet or Huawei. While I have a different number of customers using Meraki within our team, we estimate around 100 customers, with their networks graded on SD-WAN technologies.

For my use cases, I am planning to use 500 APs. Our clients are planning to increase the number of users to 15,000. So, I would need more than 2000 APs. I can scale without any issues by just purchasing the license. If it were on-premise, I would have had to upgrade the hardware and purchase the license.

I would rate it a nine; it's highly scalable.

The scalability is as I want it to be. The only thing I need to do is add a few licenses here and there, but it is scalable. I get a new device, add it on the dashboard, and I don't need to pay dashboard fees. Not too bad for me. It is scalable enough. I wouldn't want that to be changed.

As a rough estimate, we are about 1,200 users. That is the breadth of the network across the country. We have about 30 offices, with some more populated than others.

I do the deployment and maintenance myself - only one person.

We use it everyday. Every time someone walks into the office, they are using the Meraki Wireless at that point to connect to the internet and everyone who walks in the office needs the internet to work. It is being used 24/7.

It's highly scalable, receiving a perfect rating of ten out of ten. It is extensively used by over ten thousand users.

The solution is good and easy to scale if you keep the same settings everywhere.

It offers excellent scalability, making it well-suited for medium-sized businesses like ours, with approximately ten clients. I would rate it nine out of ten.

The solution's scalability is limitless and can meet our organization's growth. Around 200 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution can scale. That said, I've never reached the limit of our deployment. We haven't tested the scalability too much. 

We have about 100 users in our office.

We do not have plans to increase usage. We may decrease the number. 

It has scalability. It can be scaled depending on your business needs.

I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has three users. 

The platform is easy and quick to scale. We can add up devices on SSIDs for every configuration or node.

We have 800 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN users in our organization. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten. Less than 50 people in my company use the solution.

Our ability to scale is determined by our licensing and can be easily managed through cloud consoles. However, the wireless component of our end users poses some scalability challenges.

The stability of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has been great. I am highly satisfied.

This is not an area that I have explored as I am not a project specialist, but we would like to increase our usage.

We have approximately 300 users.

The scalability is quite satisfactory. I rate it around seven or eight, but not a perfect ten. I have deployed it for over 150 users.

The product is easy to scale. However, the extension might be expensive compared to other vendors. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

We only have two and didn't have any issues. 

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

There are no plans to expand our usage, and instead, we will opt for a single-vendor approach by replacing them with Fortinet.

Scalability-wise, it's excellent. You can integrate with other products like MX, the firewall and router of Meraki, and you can also integrate with Umbrella which is cloud security from Cisco. You can also add more access points very easily.

It is a scalable solution, though I never tried to use its scalability option. I don't even know how many devices you can add to the product.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is scalable. If we needed to expand, it's easy to add another WAP for a new location.

As we come back into the office, in January, we'll start out with approximately 100 users. We're going into a hybrid mode and we will not have as many users as we did, prior to COVID. We had upwards of 300 people connecting and that's mostly everybody with their mobiles or laptops that come into the office. At our highest, it is approximately 300 users but starting in January, we'll probably have approximately 100 to 200.

We do not have plans to expand our usage at this time. However, if we open up a new office then we will most likely expand usage.

You just buy more. In terms of the number of users, it is used by everyone in the organization. It is Wi-Fi, so you hook your phone or laptop. Everybody uses it.

Because it is cloud-based, you don't have to worry about it. Once you deploy it, it's very easy. You could actually ship one to a remote office, have them plug it in and once it phones home, you register it, and then you can configure it. So in that regard, it's very easy to set up a remote office. It's very good that way.

It is a scalable platform. We have deployed 60 access points across our organization.

The solution is scalable, the only problem we had earlier was the Meraki firewall did not support more than two ISC links, but I think the hardware has matured and can now support more than two ISC links. Some years ago now, Meraki used to lose many customers because it didn't support more than two ISC links.

The solution can scale quite well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so fairly easily.

We currently use the solution in order to cover 500 users at our company.

Our company does plan to increase usage in the future.

It is perfect in terms of scalability. I've got one system here in the UAE and one in London, and I haven't even touched the one in London, and I can do it all from here.

This is a product that scales pretty easily. We have about 1,200 people using it.

We have students and teachers and parents, and then, of course, we have staff members in general, and lots of different devices. One of the big things that I will challenge people at, and I don't think a lot of people realize this, but the challenge of some school networks is, especially for us, I'll use a final time, for example, is all of a sudden you have to have 850 to 900 people on the network at one time.

The exam starts now and all 850 students have to get on the network now. You don't see that any other school at that point in time. Kids come on, they join whenever, they've already got it on. You don't see that, but in those classes when they have to start exams, everybody has to hit that network and load a page now. Your network has to be able to be designed to handle that.

This is one of the reasons we've had to balance the wireless to make sure that we've been able to get good successful connections throughout the entire campus inside of every classroom. That way, no access points overloaded or the bandwidth is not overloaded. If you lose one in the middle, it's enough that it can withstand the fail over of another classroom in the middle of that type of exam.

It is this concept and design that has allowed us to sustain this system for more than five years without a problem.

We work with many customers using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, with deployments ranging from small offices to large enterprises. It is sometimes deployed in principal offices, catering to a user base of 15 to 20 individuals. Additionally, there are instances where larger-scale deployments are undertaken, accommodating up to a hundred users.

I rate the platform's scalability an eight out of ten.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a scalable solution.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

If I compare the other brands in the market, like Sangfor or Sophos, with Cisco in terms of security, I see that Cisco is not a part of the Gartner Report. Cisco is deployed in multinational companies and not in small to mid-sized organizations.

It is a scalable solution. We had 50 solution users in our organization.

It is a super scalable solution. There are no limitations to the number of devices you can add.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is easy to scale.

I didn't have to scale it. We had 26 users. They included secretaries and deputies to Sheriff.

It scales well up to the larger midsize enterprise. The MX appliances are less scalable than the wifi or the switches. They're a little underpowered and so that's the point where you'd move to a different solution if you needed more scalability if you had more bandwidth requirements. We currently have 150 users. 

The solution’s scalability is good.

Around 20 customers are using this solution.

Meraki is not a very scalable solution. It has its own limitations on the number of devices you can deploy. I would say it's not a very scalable solution.

Its scalability is a five out of 10. 

I can add or remove without any issues. So, scalability is no issue. It is being extensively used in the organization at the moment.

It's very scalable. We could increase the system we have, but because of its age, we actually need to replace the entire thing at once. So instead of doing it piecemeal and having some of the older products remain while we put in a new product, we would rather replace the whole system. 

The solution is easily scalable. There are not really any limits for the customer in terms of expanding if they need to.

From a scalability perspective, I think the tool is incredibly scalable. I assisted one of our company's customers, which is a global supermarket chain, in an evaluation, which included Cisco Meraki and the wireless component, during which, for the first time, I was exposed to the true scalability feature of the platform. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is scalable.

The solution is scalable. There are 200-300 users in our organization. There are plans to increase usage in the future.

I don't have an issue. It meets specifications.

This solution is both scalable and stable. 

The solution can scale very well. There are not problems expanding it if you need to as an organization. It's easy enough to do. Even on an enterprise-level, you can scale.

I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a ten out of ten for scalability. 2000 people are using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in our company.

About 2000 employees in the organization are using the solution. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

It is scalable. I need to add a couple more and upgrade to four.

Scaling has not been an issue.

The Meraki products scale quite well by allowing multiple organization with subdivisions of "networks" APs can be added to networks and tagged with other information as well. I would say that it works best for organizations with many diverse locations with smaller numbers of APs.

This solution has good scalability.

I would say that Meraki WLAN is scalable, but the licensing makes it a little difficult. You can't just add on more APs within your scope. You have to purchase more licenses to scale.

This is a cloud-based product and the best thing about a cloud-based product is if you have a cloud controller and access point, then you don't have to worry about that key for licenses. If you've got 70 access points, you can register there. If you have 1,000 and 2,0000, you can also register there. There is no need to change any controller hardware as that is a cloud-based product, which makes it fully scalable. You can add to it and still maintain a single point of management. 

It's not exactly the cheapest solution in terms of scalability, but it's very good. A lot of my clients have to look at other alternatives because of the cost and it's likely that in the end, they take Mojo even though I don't like that product as much. If I were going to choose an alternative to Cisco it would be Ubiquiti but it all comes down to cost.

Meraki WLAN is easy to scale. If it's a small network of around 50 access points, I think one staffer can handle the installation and maintenance. But if you go over 50 access points — about 400 clients — you would need one more staffer.

The scalability of the solution is great. However, it depends on the business' needs.

We cater to medium and enterprise companies. We have good experience in managing large networks. 

It's a scalable solution. It's pretty good.

This is a scalable solution solution. We are based in Mauritius and since it is a small island, the scale we need fits into the range that Meraki can offer. 

It is very scalable. Our customers have around 200,000 users.

It is scalable, but it definitely suffers during really large implementations.

It's a scalable solution.

Most of our clients are enterprise companies.

This is a scalable solution.

This solution is scalable.

This solution is scalable.

We have more than one thousand users, and we have plans to increase usage in the future.

I have not had any issues with scalability. If we need any more, it is literally just plug and play. It will immediately go in the network, because it is cloud-based. Everything from the network is on the cloud, so it just pushes right into the new device.

I agree wholeheartedly that the solution is scalable. 

For the moment, we do not have plans to increase the usage. 

The product scales well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

We have 500 users who are on the solution currently.

Meraki is quite scalable. 

The solution is scalable.

We currently have 60-75 users on the solution. They all use it daily.

For us, the solution seems to be pretty scalable. We haven't had any issues and haven't seen any shortcomings.

The solution is scalable. It's very easy. If a company grows, we just have to do a few clicks and it's ready.

The solution is scalable.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is scalable.

This solution is scalable.

The scalability of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good.

We don't have any challenges with the scalability so far. From our experience, it's quite scalable.

On a daily basis, we probably have an excess of 5,000 users on this solution.

There are no immediate plans to increase usage, however, there's probably a growth rate of about 5% to 8% per year for the next year or two.

Our clients are small and medium companies, and we didn't have any problems with scalability. Our clients may increase its usage in the future.

It's scalable. 

I would rate scalability as five out of ten. It's kind of hard to say.

We have scaled it. There is no problem.

We have 230 users, and they don't even know that it exists.

There is no problem with scaling. It's a scalable product.

The scalability is more or less endless. I have not seen problems with adding 100's or 1000's of devices.

This is a scalable solution.

It's scalable. We have between 50-100 users in my company. The users are our general employees. 

We don't require any staff for maintenance. For the deployment, we required four staff members. We have plans for increasing usage. The idea is to double it in size with Wifi 6. 

No

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 300 people using this solution in my organization.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is scalable. We have some customers that own 100 branches and they're connected. There was no issue regarding scalability.

Meraki Wireless LAN is a stable product.

This solution is scalable. It's good and we have no issues.

The scalability of this solution is good.

Most of our customers are enterprise companies using this solution.

The solution is scalable.

We have had no issues scaling.

Scalability has not been a problem.

This solution is scalable.

We have more than 40 users at the moment, but the number is growing.

The product is scalable and can do so on-demand. We have approximately 60 users, and we plan to continue using it in the future.