The stability needs improvement so is rated a four out of ten. 

Though Cisco NGIPS is a stable tool that offers performance, there are a lot of bugs in the product. At the moment, my company has an open ticket with the support team of Cisco in relation to IGMP snooping, where there are some bugs causing issues.

NGIPS is quite stable. 

It's stable.

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

It is a stable solution.

It is pretty stable and has good throughput.

Cisco's stability issues have caused several of our customers to complain directly to the vendor, and if these issues persist into the future I will not be able to continue recommending Cisco NGIPS to our customers. In terms of cost, security, compatibility, and flexibility, there are a lot of products doing better than Cisco, so why would customers keep buying Cisco if they can get better products with more stability? Cisco has to think of their global market first and foremost and fix their issues based on their findings. In our country, Cisco has a good name because they got here first, but a lot of customers have shifted, in terms of security, to other products such as Fortinet and Palo Alto, which have their own Next-Generation firewalls.

The stability of Cisco NGIPS has been good since we have been using it.

Cisco NGIPS is stable. 

The code is well-stabled right now and we've never had issues upgrading from one version to another. We've had it since version 2.0 and for every time we upgrade, it gets better. We're currently on version 6.6 and we're expecting that when 6.7 comes out, it will get better.

Cisco NGIPS is a stable solution.

Cisco NGIPS is stable most of the time.

The solution is stable and reliable, it does the job well.

It is more or less stable. Sometimes I have some issues normally when we need to upgrade it to newer versions. I think it does the job. The hardware does the job, and the current models do the job.

It is a stable solution.

We initially had some difficulty loading pages due to certain rules regarding performance and stability. On some websites, we had to click more than once. These issues were quite easy to fix.

Cisco NGIPS is stable, however, it is nothing special.

Cisco NGIPS is stable. 

It's very reliable. We really like the product and will be staying with the product a while.

Cisco NGIPS is stable, but I there is more that can be done.

Cisco is particularly strong when it comes to firewalls and the IPS, IBS, or next-generation firewalls. When I was working as a system architect we went from Cisco to Palo Alto or Fortinet. I don't know if they've made some recent improvements or maybe it's in the roadmap, but I would say there's still room for improvement with Cisco security appliances.

I don't remember seeing any crashes when using the solution. The product has been very stable in our company.

The product has been stable. Cisco is quite stable as a product. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches.

It has been very stable. I don't think it has gone down at all in two years.

The solution is very stable. I rate its stability a nine out of ten.

It's a really good product but I have had a really good experience with Palo Alto UTM Appliances. Which I would give a higher mark than the Firepower. It's just a little bit more expensive than the Cisco Firepower.

This is a very stable product. In Sub-Saharan Africa, it is used by every six or seven banks out of ten.

The stability is good, we haven't had any problems. 

This is a very stable solution. We have not heard any complaints from customers, and we have not experienced any trouble ourselves.

Cisco NGIPS is stable.

The stability can be better. The Cisco console is unstable.

The current version of this solution is proving to be very stable.

NGIPS is stable.

It is a stable solution.

This is one of the most stable solutions in the firewall world. 

This is a stable solution.

Initially, the solution was not stable. 

The stability is evident and without issues.

We have found this to be a stable solution in our experience.

The stability is fine. We manage to resolve general bugs by updating the software or VirtualBox as well as in the hardware. That is not a big deal for us.

This is a stable product.

The stability overall has been good once we get it up and running. We've not seen any issues once we've launched everything. It isn't buggy or glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

This current solution is stable. Last time, we worked with Cisco ASA 6500. That solution sometimes froze and we had to reboot the system. This one, as I mentioned, seems fine. We don't have this problem.

Cisco NGIPS is highly stable.

The solution is stable.

Stability is something that is tricky to judge because when you have a 600-person userbase, there are always going to be issues. As we fix them, it becomes stable again.

This product is stable. 

The solution is stable. This is one of the good things about Firepower. Especially if we use ESE with it. That would make it the complete solution for Cisco for security. If it is the complete solution, it's stable and there are no issues with the product. If the user isn't connected all the time, for example, if we look at some sites or some users, sometimes the connection for the user gets disconnected with each session. Sometimes the filter doesn't work. 

For the years we've been using Firepower we have only one or two cases of instability. There were only one or two unpredictable things.

One case was fasten with Active/standby switchover. After switchover some networks has been lost. After rebooting the standby FP next switchover was without problem.

Another case was associated with setting up of NAT. It was a FirePower nuance. Only the second TAC engineer helped us with it.

We had multiple bugs and issues on the old versions, but the new versions Cisco has recently released are much more stable. However, our customers are still facing many bugs on the system. It has matured noticeably, but we are still facing multiple stability issues on Firepower. There are more than 80 or 90 bugs for each release node. It's a considerable number of bugs. It's much better than before, but there are still too many bugs in the new versions. The R&D team needs to put more work into new releases to minimize the number of bugs.

Cisco NGIPS is a stable solution. We have not had any issues since we have been using it.

We haven't had any problems with this product.

The stability is excellent.

The stability of the product is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. the performance is good and we consider it reliable. 

This solution is one hundred percent stable.

The solution is stable.